“We’ve established a clear link…”:
![We've finally established a clear link [Image 'Reasonable_Link8.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/world.std.com/home/dacha/WWW/emg/public_html/Reasonable_Link8.jpg)
“We’ve established a clear link…”:
![We've finally established a clear link [Image 'Reasonable_Link8.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/world.std.com/home/dacha/WWW/emg/public_html/Reasonable_Link8.jpg)
US court orders treatment to ensure killer is sane enough to be executed:
“A US court of appeal has ruled that a death row prisoner be forcibly treated for psychosis which would make him sane enough to be executed.
A series of court rulings has presented convicted murderer Charles Singleton, his lawyers and prison doctors with an agonising choice.
Should he take the medication voluntarily and be condemned to death or refuse them and be condemned to a life of psychosis? Under the US constitution it is illegal to execute an insane person.
In an extraordinary and sharply divided judgment, the court of appeals in St. Louis has ruled that Singleton should be forced to take medication which will make him fit for execution.(…) Singleton, who stabbed a shopworker to death in 1979, believes his prison cell is possessed by demons, that a prison doctor implanted a device in his ear and that he is both God and the supreme court.” Guardian UK
‘Barbarity’ is right; this is truly a monstrous travesty of a decision. This Kafkaesque ruling insists that the court did not have to consider the entirety of consequences of forcing the patient to be medicated and that, on balance, the medications would benefit him; that “eligibility for execution is the only unwanted consequence of the medication”. (In actuality, one of the hallmarks of competent decision-making is a grasp of the many layers of the context in which a decision is being made, so that the potential consequences can be weighed in their entirety. You will find this principle in any of the textbooks about competency assesment.) In most states, one can only be forced to take antipsychotic medication against one’s will if incompetent to make the decision for oneself, whereas Singleton’s reasoning seems to indicate to me the essence of competent dcision-making!
Furthermore, the standard a court is supposed to use if they take over discretion from an incompetent person is that of so-called “substituted judgment” — substitute decision makers are charged to base decisions not on what they want for the individual but their best surmise of what the person themselves would choose were they competent to make their decision. By this standard, it would appear to be an open-and-shut case that the substituted judgment would be to refuse medications. In my opinion as a psychiatrist, any physician acting in good conscience ought to refuse to cooperate with this ruling. In a just world no one would treat Singleton’s psychosis under these circumstances. Unfortunately, we do not appear to live in that world any more than the one in which no physician would be the agent of the state in administering lethal injections to the condemned. Let us hope Singleton pursues this to the Supreme Court, not that one can expect much from the current Court…
FmH’s template was temporarily messed up again and many of you found the content hopelessly jumbled. Thanks to all who wrote to alert me. As is sometimes the case, Blogger didn’t let me save any of my template edits so I couldn’t correct it all day. Finally fixed now; please let me know if you are seeing any further formatting problems. If so, please tell me your browser and OS. Also, can someone who reads FmH in an RSS feed tell me if that is working for you, please; if not, what XML reader do you use under what OS?
Mozilla 1.3 beta is out.
NATO divided: “Washington’s effort to build a coalition for war against Iraq hit more resistance Tuesday from NATO and beyond, with allies balking and China adding its voice to calls for bolstered U.N. arms inspections.
The division in the alliance – triggered by France, Germany and Belgium blocking U.S. plans to defend Turkey against a possible new Gulf war – was one of NATO’s worst crises in its 53-year history, even though the 15 other alliance members support the United States.” Nando Times More and more likely the U.S. is going to go rogue, with some toadie states trailing along, and defy the opinion of the world community imminently for the greater glory of Dubya.
“An unemployed actor posted himself to the Tate Britain gallery in a wooden box.
Dan Shelton, 23, … said that the idea to post himself came from the technique used by inventors, who sealed their plans in a postmarked envelope to prove when they came up with their concept. He had turned himself into living art to explore the way that artists are seen as objects, he added.” Times of London
“The good vs. evil plot lines of the best-selling books are imbued with Christian morals, the Rev. Don Peter Fleetwood told a Vatican news conference Monday.” Yahoo! News
Death dance for the indie? “Gone are the days of Jim Jarmusch, when the term ‘independent film’ really meant something. Now it’s a label waiting for a vision.” LA Times
” Arty snobs or creative visionaries? Monied idlers or radical Bohemians? As The Hours approaches, (a) fight over the legacy of the Woolf Pack…” Idependent UK
Trading spaces: There’s a quiet curatorial revolution going on at the Museum of Fine Arts in my city of Boston:
Rogers’ rallying cry was “One Museum,” where curators would work together to display artworks in different media and incorporate work from other cultures and historical periods that served as influences. Paintings, sculpture and decorative arts would be displayed together so that objects could “speak” to each other.
Now Rogers’ revolution is starting to evolve in the galleries.
With the groundbreaking for the new East Wing expected in about a year, curators have been quietly reconfiguring spaces that house the permanent collection to experiment with these ideas. Boston Herald
What History Can Teach the Architects at Ground Zero: ‘ “The very notion of a modern monument is a contradiction in terms: if it is a monument, it cannot be modern, and if it is modern, it cannot be a monument.” The death of the monument has been proclaimed many times…’ [more] The New Republic
“…(S)cholars increasingly dispute the idea that mass production threatens the existence of particular cultural identities, either abroad or at home. After all, regional cuisines are displaying an unexpected vitality in this age of chain restaurants and global brand-names. Why? Many people, it seems, are content to preserve their local cultures through food that is as processed and mass-produced as a Happy Meal.” Boston Globe
“Your quote from ‘Song of Myself’ yesterday reminded me of one of my
favorite older web pages – the favorite poems project… (A) Massachusetts construction worker talks about the poem and recites
portions – including the portion you quoted – in his video. It’s really
a wonderful piece. The guy is great and clearly loves the poem. He
recites it while leaning against his backhoe. A little gem, I’ve always
thought.” [thanks]
I’m Nobody! Who are you?
Are you ‘Nobody’ Too?
Then there’s a pair of us!
Don’t tell! they’d advertise, you know!How dreary to be Somebody!
How public like a Frog
To tell one’s name the livelong June
To an admiring Bog! Emily Dickinson
(dedicated to George and Laura Bush as one in a continuing series
honoring ‘banned’ poets of Feb. 12th)
from Epitaph On A Tyrant – W.H. Auden:
Perfection, of a kind, was what he was after,
And the poetry he invented was easy to understand;
He knew human folly like the back of his hand,
And was greatly interested in armies and fleets;
When he laughed, respectable senators burst with laughter,
And when he cried the little children died in the streets.(thanks Adam; would George and Laura have liked Auden?)
“Is the Bush budget all about slashing Social Security and Medicare? Yes, says Kent Conrad and ‘it is nuts, stone-cold nuts’.” MSNBC [thanks to Adam]
A reader asked that I:
get down to it bobbers
And this I did not do.
Another requested:
the body of an american
But Dos Passos or MacGowan, I knew not which, and so I merely sat and mulled my whiskey straight.
And another would very much like please some:
tahitian vanilla…..
But who placed this order I do not know, although I suspect Clarence King.
Yet another informs me:
I spoke to a member of the loyal Naderite opposition in Boulder, and she told me after Allard’s win she’s focusing on her wedding plans, which involve avoiding all traditions of the “wedding-industrial complex.”
And I could have suggested she register at Cut Loose and yet the draw came tardily upon my hand.
Josh Lukin testifies:
I thought of your entry on memorable and moving last lines the other day as I read “The Bus Driver Who Wanted to Be God and Other Stories” by Etgar Keret, who Justine Larbalestier thinks is the Kelly Link of Tel Aviv: “I tried to imagine my mother’s uterus in the middle of a green, dew-covered field, floating in an ocean full of dolphins and tuna.” “Or else, if the broad in the square wouldn’t have had a boyfrined in the army and she’d given Tiran her phone number and we’d called Rabin Shalom, then he would have been run over anyway, but at least nobody would have got clobbered.” A whole book chock full of heartbreaking final lines.
Still, several days hence I have not read Etgar Keret’s prose collection nor even his comic book.
And when a final reader tells me of one who
was trying to remember the name of wealthbondage.com, and came up with “The Cruising Politician.”
I can only wonder at the undeserved bounty of my days and on my head.
![Rho Cassiopeiae //www.sciam.com/media/inline/000B87BC-F8F3-1E3A-82FC809EC5880000_1.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/www.sciam.com/media/inline/000B87BC-F8F3-1E3A-82FC809EC5880000_1.jpg)
“Astronomers have identified the best candidate yet for our galaxy’s next supernova explosion, according to a new report. Findings published in the February 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal suggest that Rho Cassiopeiae, located 10,000 light-years away from earth, is most likely to run out of fuel and meet a violent fate in the near future.” Scientific American
“More universal than television, livelier than billboards — London marketing whiz kids have hit upon a new advertising medium: the human forehead.
In a national British campaign to be rolled out in coming weeks, marketing agency Cunning Stunts said on Friday it was about to start renting advertising space on the foreheads of university students.” Reuters
The Beard Liberation Front was reacting to a Bristol University study claiming that men who do not shave regularly have a 70% increase in chances of having a stroke. Ananova
From Song of Myself Walt Whitman
LII
The spotted hawk swoops by and accuses me, he complains
of my gab and my loitering.I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,
I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.The last scud of day holds back for me,
It flings my likeness after the rest and true as any on the shadow’d wilds,
It coaxes me to the vapor and the dusk.I depart as air, I shake my white locks at the runaway sun,
I effuse my flesh in eddies, and drift it in lacy jags.I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,
If you want me again look for me under your boot-soles.You will hardly know who I am or what I mean,
But I shall be good health to you nevertheless,
And filter and fibre your blood.Failing to fetch me at first keep encouraged,
Missing me one place search another,
I stop somewhere waiting for you.(for George and Laura Bush as one in a continuing series honoring ‘banned’ poets of Feb. 12th)
Hosted at the Pomona University’s Dept. of Psychology. Interesting articles in the current incarnation of the web page include:
Speaking of the distinction between consciousness and unconsciousness (a loose association to the item above), here’s Ellen Goodman’s Boston Globe op-ed piece on the Michael Dini case. Am I the last one to hear about this Texas Tech biology professor — as an aside, apparently a devout Catholic — who is being sued and apparently made a cause celebre by the Ashcroft Justice Dept. for religious discrimination by someone he wouldn’t recommend for medical school admission because the student would not ‘ ”truthfully and forthrightly affirm a scientific answer” to the question: ”How do you think the human species originated?” ‘ ? Goodman, characterizing this as “the sort of frivolous lawsuit you thought conservatives opposed, but never mind”, notes that
“conservative lawyers are now agile and nervy enough to hijack liberal arguments for their own causes. Kelly Shackleford, the chief counsel, actually compared Dini’s attitude toward a creationist with that of a racist. What if Dini refused to write letters of recommendation to African-Americans? Shackleford asked. ”I can’t imagine the university would say, well, that’s a personal decision of one of our professors and we’re not going to interfere. Discrimination on the basis of race, sex, or religion is prohibited.”
Needless – or maybe not needless – to say, Dini’s refusal to recommend a creationist for a graduate degree in medicine or science is not like refusing to recommend an African-American. It’s like refusing to recognize someone who doesn’t believe in gravity for a PhD program in physics. But creationists who believe that the origin of species is an open-and-shut book – and the book is the Bible – now accuse evolutionists of being narrow-minded.”
Of course it is specious to make this an issue of intellectual freedom, as Dini’s detractors do. As Goodman concludes with acumen, this is symptomatic of the creationists’ and the dysadministration’s disingenuousness or cognitive difficulty in distniguishing belief from fact:
“If he is convicted of ‘discriminating’ against religion, surely every student can demand that a professor equate beliefs and facts. Next stop, astrology for astronomers? Feng Shui for physicists? Anyone want a recommendation? How about a lawyer instead?”
But there’s even more at stake. Writing references — of which I do alot — trades in the reputation and integrity of the reference-writer. It is a privilege, not a right, to get a good reference. If you don’t know me well enough to know what kind of reference you’re going to get from me, you probably shouldn’t ask me for a reference, because I don’t know you well enough to write a credible one. And, certainly, if you know you disagree with me on a criterion I have for judging your qualifications, I’m the last one you should go to for a recommendation unless you’re deliberately trying to compromise me because of our disagreement. We don’t yet live in a country where there is some ideological means test to qualify for a faculty position.
A persistent theme among people writing about the social aspects of weblogging is to note (and usually lament) the rise of an A-list, a small set of webloggers who account for a majority of the traffic in the weblog world. This complaint follows a common pattern we’ve seen with MUDs, BBSes, and online communities like Echo and the WELL. A new social system starts, and seems delightfully free of the elitism and cliquishness of the existing systems. Then, as the new system grows, problems of scale set in. Not everyone can participate in every conversation. Not everyone gets to be heard. Some core group seems more connected than the rest of us, and so on.
Prior to recent theoretical work on social networks, the usual explanations invoked individual behaviors: some members of the community had sold out, the spirit of the early days was being diluted by the newcomers, et cetera. We now know that these explanations are wrong, or at least beside the point. What matters is this: Diversity plus freedom of choice creates inequality, and the greater the diversity, the more extreme the inequality.
In systems where many people are free to choose between many options, a small subset of the whole will get a disproportionate amount of traffic (or attention, or income), even if no members of the system actively work towards such an outcome. This has nothing to do with moral weakness, selling out, or any other psychological explanation. The very act of choosing, spread widely enough and freely enough, creates a power law distribution.
“Men who outwardly express anger at least some of the time may be doing their health a favor: A new study suggests that occasional anger expression is associated with decreased risk of stroke and coronary heart disease.
Men with moderate levels of anger expression had nearly half the risk of nonfatal heart attacks and a significant reduction in the risk of stroke compared to men with low levels of anger expression. In the case of stroke, the researchers found that the risk decreased in proportion to increasing levels of anger expression.” ScienceDaily Good thing there’s so much to be angry about. Thank you George, for one…
Minims (as contrasted with maxims). Giornale Nuovo
This tribute site by Jim Sharpe’s daughter Jennifer Sharpe (of sharpeworld fame) is getting blinked alot. I wasn’t familiar with this hilarious and irreverent duo who, according to the site, “roved the streets of San Francisco in the sixties looking to ‘terrorize’ people in the interest of humor. Their surreal encounters were captured on tape then broadcast on their nightly radio show, ‘On the Loose’ .”
On San Francisco’s Market Street last week, two somber-faced public-opinion ‘pollsters’ approached a young man, thrust a microphone in his face, and after a few minutes of earnest conversation asked: ‘Would you be interested in helping future generations to fly?’ When the young man said ‘yes,’ the pollsters asked: ‘Well, then, would you let us graft a pair of chicken wings on your forehead?’
BTW, as Jennifer suggests at her site:
embarrassed to be an american right now?
call the white house and tell them:
comment line: 202-456-1111
fax line: 202-456-2461
An interview with the author at 80:
Q: My feeling from talking to readers and friends is that many people are beginning to despair. Do you think that we�ve lost reason to hope?
Vonnegut: I myself feel that our country, for whose Constitution I fought in a just war, might as well have been invaded by Martians and body snatchers. Sometimes I wish it had been. What has happened, though, is that it has been taken over by means of the sleaziest, low-comedy, Keystone Cops-style coup d�etat imaginable. And those now in charge of the federal government are upper-crust C-students who know no history or geography, plus not-so-closeted white supremacists, aka �Christians,� and plus, most frighteningly, psychopathic personalities, or �PPs.�
To say somebody is a PP is to make a perfectly respectable medical diagnosis, like saying he or she has appendicitis or athlete�s foot. The classic medical text on PPs is The Mask of Sanity by Dr. Hervey Cleckley. Read it! PPs are presentable, they know full well the suffering their actions may cause others, but they do not care. They cannot care because they are nuts. They have a screw loose! In These Times
Different Man, Different Moment: ‘ Pundits and officials in Washington have dubbed Secretary of State Colin Powell’s attempt to make a case for war against Iraq in the United Nations Security Council an “Adlai Stevenson moment.”
I couldn’t disagree more. My father was Adlai Stevenson, who in 1962, as President Kennedy’s representative to the United Nations, presented the Security Council with incontrovertible proof that the Soviet Union, a nuclear superpower, was installing missiles in Cuba and threatening to upset the world’s “balance of terror.”
That “moment” had an obvious purpose: containing the Soviet Union and maintaining peace. It worked, and eventually the Soviet Union collapsed under its own weight. This moment has a different purpose: war.’ NY Times op-ed
“What would you do if you got a note from God? Would you sell it on Ebay? Would you call the cops?” Killing the Buddha
You and your constant demands:
“Harpies torture suicides in Hell. How is it you torture me on Earth? What wrong have I committed that you hover here – beside me, over me, behind me – gnawing at my ears? ” —Dennis Mahoney, The Morning News
Cajole Your Brain to Lean to the Left: “All too many years ago, while I was still a psychology graduate student, I ran an experiment to assess how well meditation might work as an antidote to stress. My professors were skeptical, my measures were weak, and my subjects were mainly college sophomores. Not surprisingly, my results were inconclusive.
But today I feel vindicated.
To be sure, over the years there have been scores of studies that have looked at meditation, some suggesting its powers to alleviate the adverse effects of stress. But only last month did what I see as a definitive study confirm my once-shaky hypothesis, by revealing the brain mechanism that may account for meditation’s singular ability to soothe.” — Dan Goleman, NY Times Another in the series of remarkable findings emerging from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain. [I happened to have been Dan Goleman’s research assistant on the study he writes about above, BTW. -FmH]
‘Germany and France are working on a new initiative to try to avert war in Iraq, a German government spokesman said on Saturday, with a magazine saying they aim to present the plan to the United Nations Security Council.
“I can confirm that there are joint considerations on finding a peaceful alternative to a military solution to the Iraq conflict,” the government spokesman told Reuters.
He declined to provide details.’ ABC.net.au
Spaced Out
Another maudlin, media-crazed moment. But hold the scorn. ” ‘The Columbia is Lost’ story involved large themes, important policies and billions of dollars mixed in with drama, tragedy and heroism too. If not this, then what kind of story should the media go overboard about?” columnist Jonah Goldberg in WSJ opinionjournal.
“If you want a preview of what might occur if the United States were to invade Iraq, Elaine Fantham suggests looking at what happened in 53 B.C. when the Romans marched into the territory that is now Iraq. Ms. Fantham, 69, is National Public Radio’s mischievous, fruity-voiced classics commentator on ‘Weekend Edition,’ and her specialty is drawing parallels between the ancient world and us.” NY Times
The mysterious white clumps have been reported in over a hundred units of blood so far, most but not all in transfusion bags from a particular manufacturer. One desperately ill patient has died while receiving a transfusion of the adulterated blood (although officials hasten to say the patient was so ill that the association of the death with the transfusion may have been only coincidental) and there have been six other adverse reactions. NY Times Filters remove the clumps during transfusions, but what is causing them?
“Reality takes a new bite at Atlanta area recording studio, The Guest House Live. TGHL, the first on-line recording studio and jam space, is in the midst of recording the first album ever to be completely seen and heard on-line. Anyone can watch and listen to Sonic Whisper, a new pop/rock band, honing their first album just as it happens.” biz ink
Nuke Plants Aging Disgracefully: “Cracks, corrosion and other signs of age at U.S. nuclear power plants have been the root of a growing list of near-miss accidents that experts and environmental activists fear could lead to true disaster.” Wired News
Composer, 85, Dies, eulogized by John Rockwell in the New York Times: “Lou Harrison, a distinguished composer in all genres of classical music, founder of the American gamelan movement and a leading exemplar of the marriage of Asian and Western music, died on Sunday evening at a Denny’s restaurant in Lafayette, Ind. He was 85 and lived in Aptos, Calif.”
Human Behavior Designed to Avoid Thoughts of Death:
“Like all good social psychologists, Jamie Arndt has more than a few ideas about ways people think and behave. Specifically, he and some of his colleagues in the department of psychological sciences at the University of Missouri-Columbia seek to understand why people work so hard to feel good about themselves. The answer, they believe, can be found in an overriding fear of death.
“Only humans have the fine-tuned cognitive ability to fully realize the inevitability of their own mortality,” Arndt said.
This ability to ponder the inevitability of death, however, doesn’t necessarily translate into thoughtful consideration and acceptance of it. Instead, as Arndt and his colleagues argue, people develop sophisticated behavioral systems that are designed to help them avoid thinking about dying. A subtle reminder of the inevitability of death, even for people who are otherwise psychologically healthy, can create the potential for extreme anxiety, even terror. People struggle to manage the onset or possibility of this terror.” Newswise. Wasn’t this the point Ernest Becker made in the 1974 Pulitzer Prize winning Denial of Death?
In an op-ed piece in the New York Times, Leonard Garment, at one time Nixon White House counsel and now developing the Jazz Museum in Harlem, is incensed at the ‘bad behavior’ of some poets in mixing art and politics which resulted in the cancellation of the Feb. 12th White House poetry symposium (partly because the symposium, he was hoping, would have advanced his current cause):
Such relationships will thrive only if politicians and artists display mutual restraint. Each party must refrain from gratuitously poking a finger in the eye of the other, a principle that the protesting poets flouted. They sought to use for political ends the platform that the White House provided to them for their artistry. They showed no concern for the effect of this on other artists and enterprises. Of course, they were exercising their constitutional rights. But they should not be surprised that Mrs. Bush, exercising her own rights, declined to offer them tea and cake. Let’s call it poetic justice and move on.
He cites numerous examples of such uppity artistic agitation interfering with Federal patronage of the arts throughout the years, including the Maplethorpe and Serrano flaps (although conceding that the current antiwar poets have better manners). Let us hope poets do not heed his plea that ‘poetic justice’ remain ever civil and impotent.
Here’s some ‘bad behavior’: Circulars: poets, artists and critics respond to u.s. global policy.
A Dream Deferred — Langston Hughes
What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore–
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over–
like a syrupy sweet?Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.Or does it explode?
(for George and Laura Bush – and, today, Leonard Garment —as one in a continuing series honoring ‘banned’ poets of Feb. 12th)
![Feb. 15th in NYC //www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?list=sub&sub=30' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/www.whodies.com/images/feb15_outreach_eng4.jpg)
Act: Feb. 15th in NYC.
Legends of the fall —
Wondering just how legendary you really are? Find out, instantly, just like Phil Spector!
“…With such a muddled mess of opinions floating around, it’s easy to forget that this is only the beginning of the media dog-pile. Once new evidence arises, or, if Spector is found guilty, an even darker picture should emerge. Celebrities like Robert Blake and O.J. Simpson have demonstrated that, once that verdict comes in (or even beforehand), friends will start to recall a darker, uglier you than ever before.
But, paradoxically, if you’re actually convicted, things should start looking up: You’ll have the benefit of looking all sallow and depressed in your prison garb. When people think you’re accustomed to savoring fine foods and sleeping on Egyptian cotton sheets, they seem to have a tough time seeing you suffer through poly blends and mystery meat stroganoff. Thousands of hearts will cry out to you, and worry about how you’re sleeping at night and whether you’ll have to trade your cup of tapioca for the right to remain unmolested by T-Bone, your cellmate. Those thousands of hearts have watched “Oz” — they know the deal.
Your time behind bars might ruin your complexion, but it’ll do wonders for your image.” Salon
Air Force imagery confirms Columbia wing damaged. “High-resolution images taken from a ground-based Air Force tracking camera in southwestern U.S. show serious structural damage to the inboard leading edge of Columbia’s left wing, as the crippled orbiter flew overhead about 60 sec. before the vehicle broke up over Texas killing the seven astronauts on board Feb. 1.
According to sources close to the investigation, the images, under analysis at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, show a jagged edge on the left inboard wing structure near where the wing begins to intersect the fuselage. They also show the orbiter’s right aft yaw thrusters firing, trying to correct the vehicle’s attitude that was being adversely affected by the left wing damage.” [more] Spaceflight Now
“Researchers have created the blackest black ever made on Earth… This new super-black coating … is designed to revolutionise the manufacture of optical instruments.
It reflects 10 to 20 times less light than the black paint currently used to reduce unwanted reflections in instruments. And this means the super-black coating may one day help improve the vision of the Hubble Space Telescope…” New Scientist
‘Here’s an interesting story. It’s an important one, and it’s not being covered.
After Colin Powell spoke to the UN Security Council yesterday, a bi-partisan bill was introduced in Congress by Reps. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Ron Paul (R-TX). It wasn’t just any bill – this is legislation that looks to repeal the Iraq Use of Force Resolution passed by Congress in October.’
After the repeal, Congress could take a thoughtful look at the evidence and, if warranted, vote to authorize war in due time, but it would slow down the process and allow for continued lesser efforts in the meanwhile. Sound like a good idea? This piece goes on to describe how the bill has gotten virtually no major media attention. ‘It’s not news’??
(…)
‘Agree with DeFazio and Paul? Dial up the Congressional toll-free switchboard at 1-800-839-5276 and urge your Congressman to sign onto their bill, H.J. Res 20, which aims to repeal the Iraq Use of Force Resolution.’ Ruminate This
Gate-Crasher Hands Bush ‘Message From God’
‘The Rev. Richard “Rich” Weaver, nicknamed “Handshake Man” because of his knack for getting up close and personal with the high and mighty, struck again yesterday morning. The Post‘s David Montgomery reports that the 57-year-old Weaver, a nondenominational Christian minister from Sacramento, crashed the National Prayer Breakfast at the Washington Hilton, breezing through the ballroom entrance without a ticket and handed President Bush what he later described as an eight-page typed “message from God” about Iraq.’ Washington Post. Oh my God, it could just have easily been a left-winger!
Speaking of Precedents:
Terry Jones: “I’m losing patience with my neighbours, Mr Bush. I’m really excited by George Bush’s latest reason for bombing Iraq: he’s running out of patience. And so am I!
For some time now I’ve been really pissed off with Mr Johnson, who lives a couple of doors down the street. Well, him and Mr Patel, who runs the health food shop. They both give me queer looks, and I’m sure Mr Johnson is planning something nasty for me, but so far I haven’t been able to discover what. I’ve been round to his place a few times to see what he’s up to, but he’s got everything well hidden. That’s how devious he is.” Guardian UK
Saddam Hussein is a despot, a dictator, a torturer, and a fiend. That’s not the question. To be sure, the Iraqi people would be better off in a democracy. And perhaps Saddam really is hiding weapons he should not have (though convincing evidence has yet to be presented). The issue, rather, is whether risking the lives and health of American troops, provoking likely terrorist attacks on New York and other U.S. targets, and most certainly wiping out many thousands of Iraqisthe UN predicts upwards of half a million Iraqis requiring medical treatment as a result of “direct or indirect injuries” related to the waris the best way to disarm Saddam and improve the lives of the people suffering under his rule. Not to mention the related consequences of gutting civil liberties and eviscerating social spending here, and taking the chance of regional conflagration in the Middle East.
Village Voice
Whose Smoking Gun? Powell’s evidence shouldn’t mean war:
Iraq hawks are troubled by the failure of some Americans to fall in line behind President Bush after Wednesday’s impressive performance by Colin Powell. Now that Powell has so clearly shown that Iraq has illegal weapons, they ask, how could anyone argue for continuing United Nations weapons inspections, rather than just fast forwarding to war? Actually, it’s not as hard as you’d think. Robert Wright,
Slate
Failing to make the case for war:
The White House’s arguments for war all along have been less conclusions based on evidence than evidence based on conclusions less like the determination of a judge, and more like the lawyers arguing to the jury. Powell’s presentation to the U.N., with its more concrete evidence and its more sober demeanor, should be considered every bit as critically, and skeptically, as those of the more hyperbolic prosecutors preceding him.
And, to quote the late, wondrous Peggy Lee: Is that all there is? Geov Parrish,
AlterNet
Powell’s dubious case for war:
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell’s presentation to the UN Security Council today wasn’t likely to win over anyone not already on his side. He ignored the crucial fact that in the past several days (in Sunday’s New York Times and in his Feb. 4 briefing of UN journalists) Hans Blix denied key components of Powell’s claims.
Blix, who directs the UN inspection team in Iraq, said the UNMOVIC inspectors have seen “no evidence” of mobile biological weapons labs, have “no persuasive indications” of Iraq-al Qaeda links, and no evidence of Iraq hiding and moving material used for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) either outside or inside Iraq. Dr. Blix also said there was no evidence of Iraq sending scientists out of the country, of Iraqi intelligence agents posing as scientists, of UNMOVIC conversations being monitored, or of UNMOVIC being penetrated. Phyllis Bennis,
Foreign Policy in Focus via AlterNet
The inspections flap: both sides are wrong:
The verbal fight about the search for weapons in Iraq is a waste of words. This fractious debate, like the search for the weapons themselves, is a red herring a diversion from the real reasons for war. Oddly, those who oppose the war are trapped by the inspection regime’s logic every bit as much as President Bush is. In a mirror image of each other, both are beholden to the wrong standards, pretending to follow the rules, and letting more important issues slide by. John Tirman,
AlterNet
Trust Colin Powell? A retrospective:
The U.S. news media promoted two “themes” about Secretary of State Colin Powell’s trip to the United Nations where he buttressed George W. Bushs case for war with Iraq by presenting satellite photographs of trucks outside buildings and snippets of intercepted conversations.
While the evidence on its face didnt seem to prove much of anything, the media’s first “theme” was that Powell is a trustworthy man of principle, a straight talker who wouldn’t be part of some cheap propaganda ploy. The second “theme” was that Powells appearance before the United Nations was a kind of sequel to Adlai Stevensons convincing case that Soviet missiles had been installed in Cuba in 1962.
But both themes Powells trustworthiness and the Cuban missile precedent may be misleading, as articles below from the Consortiumnews.com Archives will demonstrate.
The Consortium
E.J. Dionne and David Brooks, NPR’s Friday evening political pundits summarizing the week’s news on “All Things Considered”, come at it from the supposed two sides of the political spectrum, but they agreed in this evening’s commentary that the American public’s debate about the war is over after the State of the Union address and the Powell U.N. speech. If indeed the American public has been convinced, shame on them. First, if we had all this evidence for so long, why wait until now to pull it out of the hat? I just don’t buy the business about an intense debate within the administration about whether to jeopardize intelligence sources. We would never have insisted on reestablishing the inspection process if we already had proof (not to mention that it is proof that is not supported from on the ground, according to the chief inspector…). Secondly, all the evidence about Iraq’s concealing weapons misses the point, upon which the Europeans continue to insist, that there is no imminent threat from Iraq. Thirdly, to attempt to make the case for a clear and present danger by linking Iraq and al Qaeda is a stretch so huge that it was painfully embarrassing to listen to. Finally, and most important, it has been the dysadministration’s game of three card monte all along to configure this debate around WMD, which is only the pretext for war. Oh, so that’s why the big charade about the inspection process. If you’re only paying attention to what’s going on in my right hand, I can do anything I want with my left.. But:
In a host of developments yesterday, the Pentagon said 113,000 US troops were in the Gulf, on course for the target of 150,000 the accepted minimum for a war by 15 February. An important unit, the 20,000-strong 101st Airborne Division, was ordered to the Gulf.
Independent UK
Since Chirac has signalled that France will not change its position, and would use its UN Security Council veto to stop a second resolution authorizing force, the US will fall back on its “coalition of the willing” with its new toadies in eastern Europe, and exercise the right upon which it has insisted to go it without UN authorization. William Saletan, writing in
Slate, tallies How Powell Did in the Security Council:
In his presentation to the U.N. Security Council Wednesday morning, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell sought to convince the council of three things: 1) that his evidence was solid and damning; 2) that Iraq’s current level of cooperation was unacceptable under Security Council Resolution 1441, thereby justifying war; and 3) that this failure to cooperate rendered inspections futile, clearing the way for an imminent war decision.
After Powell spoke, representatives of the remaining 14 council members delivered their preliminary judgments of his presentation. Their comments on the three key questions, summarized in the table below, indicate that Powell succeeded on the first question and gained the upper hand on the second but failed to attract enough support on the third. The bottom line is that the council’s sanctions on Iraq will stay in place, and if the United States can wait, the council (as presently constituted) will eventually authorize war. But if the United States insists on going to war now, it will have to do so without that authorization.
So it is coming soon the buildup, the rhetoric and the logistics say it has to be this year rather than next when the Presidential campaign will be gearing up, and it has to be before it gets too hot. Oh, and by the way,
France is no longer an ally of the United States and the NATO alliance “must develop a strategy to contain our erstwhile ally or we will not be talking about a NATO alliance” the head of the Pentagon’s top advisory board said in Washington Tuesday.
Richard Perle, a former assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration and now chairman of the Pentagon’s Policy Advisory Board, condemned French and German policy on Iraq in the strongest terms at a public seminar organized by a New York-based PR firm and attended by Iraqi exiles and American Middle East and security officials.
UPI
To cap it off,
Sydney Morning Herald.
British dossier on Iraq copied academic paper
A British government dossier intended to show how Iraq is obstructing of UN weapons inspectors via an “infrastructure of concealment, deception and intimidation” has been revealed to have lifted significant sections from academic papers.
The document was issued by the UK in January 2003 and described as drawing “upon a number of sources, including intelligence material”. It aims to demonstrate “how the Iraqi regime is constructed to have, and to keep, weapons of mass destruction”.
But a number of pages of the document were copied virtually word for word from a paper published in the journal Middle East Review of International Affairs in September 2002. This was written by Ibrahim al-Marashi, an academic at the Centre for Non-proliferation Studies in California in the US.
Further sections of the dossier were copied from articles written by Sean Boyne and Ken Gause that appeared in the military journal Jane’s Intelligence Review in 1997 and 2002.
Military analysts and opposition politicians in the UK have described the copying as “scandalous”, saying the dossier was presented as being the product of the very latest government intelligence.
(…)The revelation is particularly embarrassing as US Secretary of State Colin Powell gave special mention to the dossier in a key presentation of evidence against Iraq at the UN Security Council on Wednesday. New Scientist
“Women are better at talking to babies than men, researchers say.
But experts warn the finding should not be used as an excuse for men to leave women holding the baby.” BBC
Brought to our knees…
Today and tomorrow are the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Great Blizzard of 1978, which covered eastern Massachusetts with a sudden fresh 27″ of snow atop the previous week’s base of 21″, then sculpted it with 90 m.p.h. Nor’easter winds into drifts higher than the rooftops. The Boston metropolitan area shut down, it was illegal to drive on any streets anywhere in the disaster area, and I had a blissful week cross-country skiing around town and testing my prowess at digging snow caves and building igloos, although I did do some duty with the National Guard delivering medicines to shut-ins. This was one of the first experiences during which I marvelled that human hubris could be so readily cut down to size by the majesty of nature at its furious worst (best?), and revelled at that peculiar liminal suspension of social norms that allows the efflorescence of unmediated human kindness and community, however brief and awkward. Although mindful of the loss of life, I still feel that way hearing of most natural ‘disasters’.
The Madness of George Dubya: “(The) idea is very simple: to apply the premise behind Terry Southern’s Strangelove script to a war with Iraq. So we have the crazed head of a US air base in Britain, who regards UN weapons inspectors as “pinko, degenerate subversives”, launching a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Saddam Hussein.
While George Dubya cowers in his bunker clutching his teddy bear, panic ensues in Downing Street. But as the dithering PM finally authorises troops to break into the American base, the US military relish the prospect of all-out nuclear war.” Guardian UK Big hit in the UK; how far off Broadway would it have to be to be tolerable in America?
Tadpoles take the blame for human hiccoughing
There are many similarities between hiccuping and gill ventilation in animals like tadpoles, the researchers argue. Both are inhibited when the lungs are inflated, for example, and by high carbon dioxide levels in air or water. But why do we still hiccup 370 million years after our ancestors began hauling themselves onto land?
If the team is right, hiccupping before birth is just an early stage in the development of suckling, a little like learning to crawl before you can walk. Straus thinks the circuitry that controls the movements of the gills and glottis was conserved during evolution because it formed a building block for more complex motor patterns, such as suckling in mammals. “Hiccups may be the price to pay to keep this useful pattern generator,” he says.
The US National Institute of Standards and Technology will soon be testing a controversial theory about the collapse of the World Trade Center towers.
According to an analysis by a leading fire-safety expert, had the fire-proofing insulation on the towers’ steel structures been thicker, the towers would have survived longer and might even have remained standing after they were hit by the hijacked planes. The work is being seized on by lawyers representing victims’ families and insurance companies.
If confirmed, it could also lead to changes in building codes.
Mexican rebels: ‘We don’t want tourists’.
Zapatista rebels are threatening to seize a ranch and guest house owned by U.S. citizens and are running tourists out of parts of southern Chiapas state — an unexpected turn for a country whose third-largest income source is tourism.” Seeing this headline [courtesy of dangerousmeta], I wondered at first if the article was referring to the ranch the Harvard University Chiapas Project owned, and maybe still does, in San Cristobal de las Casas, a major tourist destination in the highlands of Chiapas and a gateway to the indigenous territories of the post-Mayan peoples associated with the Zapatista rebel movement. The ranch was used for continuous anthropological research under the direction of Harvard Professor Evon Vogt and others who studied the modern-day Maya. It was an important training site to teach anthropology students fieldwork techniques. As I’ve described here before, I was a member of the Harvard Chiapas Project in the ’70’s and my undergraduate thesis arose from fieldwork I did there.
The ranch threatened by the Zapatistas, however, is an ecotourism resort fifty miles east of San Cristobal. I’ve wondered at times if the Harvard program still exists (Vogt is retired now and has already written a memoir of its efforts) and, if so, if it has been responsive to the indigenous uprising or in its way.
North Korea Intensifies War of Words With U.S., threatens pre-emptive strike against the US. NY Times The dysadministration response is to dismiss the threats as the usual North Korean rhetoric. While it probably is bluster, it misses the point . The Bush war-fighting doctrine abandons restraint in embracing such options as preemption (i.e. starting wars), suggesting the permissibility of tactical nuclear weapon use, military provocation before exhausting skillful diplomatic approaches, and unilateralism in defiance of world opinion. This is sure to be cited as a precedent by other rogue states [If it isn’t clear, I mean rogue states other than the U.S. FmH] with the capability and recklessness to act on their threats even if North Korea does not, and the U.S. will never see its responsibility for the lawlessness that follows, just as it is taboo to explore its responsibility for being targeted by radical Islamist terrorist wrath.
U.S. Mourns? Don’t Believe It. John Balzar captures exactly what has troubled me since Saturday’s accident. However, I’ve also wondered if some of the pathos of the reaction to the shuttle disaster isn’t just the diversion from the looming war weighing heavily on our collective psyche although not consciously acknowledged in many circles.
“The hype, not the accident, is what’s shocking. The disintegration of a space shuttle is a big story. But it’s not that big. We’re all moved by the death of astronauts, just not that moved. It’s a tragedy for sure. But …
Does it really warrant the preposterous questions we hear being asked?
Will President Bush have to rethink Iraq? Will he find it easier to bend Congress to his will for the sake of tax cuts? Are critics of the president once again unpatriotic? Has Bush displayed anew his remarkable leadership? Should humankind abandon the quest to explore our universe? Is everything different now? Blah, blah.” LA Times [via dangerousmeta]
“The Pentagon is considering cremating remains of troops who may die in a chemical or biological attack in a possible war with Iraq, officials said Thursday.
(…) The reason for the high-level policy review is the prospect of mass casualties, especially from smallpox or anthrax, that would require the quick disposal of bodies to protect the living. ” CNN
Emily Dickinson:
To make a prairie it takes a clover and one bee,
One clover, and a bee,
And revery.
The revery alone will do,
If bees are few.
Wood s lot compiles a set of blinks on this issue. The right-wing bloggers invariably use the claim that their viewpoint is disenfranchised to justify their self-righteous biliousness. [I prefer leftwing righteous biliousness myself. —FmH]
[thanks, mark]
Type “suicide” into an Internet search engine, and among the sites advertising therapy, hotlines and antidepressants, you’ll find a handful of pages where suicidal strangers counsel each other on the best way to die.
The largest site, called alt.suicide.holiday, or ASH, combines a public newsgroup, chat rooms and guide files instructing visitors on how to kill themselves using everything from aspirin to rat poison.
Local news reports have so far linked ASH to three suicides. Wired News was able to confirm another seven deaths associated with the site in interviews with relatives over the last month. In addition, ASH itself lists another 14 suicides as “success stories,” but those could not be verified because of the anonymous screen names used by the people who allegedly died.
Evidence exists that at least one person downloaded carbon monoxide poisoning instructions from the site before killing herself.
The ASH site, which started as a Usenet bulletin board in 1991, has spun off a related newsgroup and chat rooms.
In addition to the main newsgroup, a kind of online diary whose participants vent feelings of unhappiness and comment on each other’s suicide plans, visitors can find advice on funeral arrangements, writing goodbye letters and an agony calculator that computes the pain and lethality factors of various types of suicide.
‘Let me get this straight: You’re looking for advice for dealing with hopelessness and depression from someone who’s hopeless and depressed? How logical is that?’ — a psychiatrist interviewed for his reaction to this phenomenon, which is the first part of a three-part series in Wired. The second part is here: No one asked why he wanted to die. My reaction is abit more complicated than a neat soundbite, I hope. It starts from first principles — the mission of mental health professionals is not to prevent all suicide but only preventable suicides. It sounds like a tautology (it isn’t proven preventable until you prevent it, right?) but, believe me, even though we don’t have a crystal ball, it isn’t. Certain psychiatric illness is a terminal disease, the suicide associated with it inevitable; certain suicide is a rational choice, not a product of the impaired judgment, thought, impulse control or emotion of a mental illness; certain self-injurious behavior is nonetheless not of suicidal proportion; and certain seemingly suicidal ideation is merely “as-if”.
To construe one’s mission as preventing all suicide would be not only impossible, of course, but worthy of the type of paternalistic society a John Ashcroft envisions, clicking neatly with the nondiscerning and obsolescent attitudes (of Ashcroft or his ilk, my guess is) which consider suicide either a crime, a sin, or both. If you believe in free will, it would be a mistake, although one readily made in grief and bewilderment after a suicide, to blame anyone external for providing the know-how or even the means, even if they are actively encouraging. This is only a new issue insofar as it is web-based; the Hemlock Society has fought for the right to publish how-to manuals for suicide for a long time. Even if you believe they intend them to be used only to alleviate the suffering of those with painful fatal medical conditions, others certainly have access to them.
I train other mental health professionals in suicide assessment and prevention, and certainly feel it is our burden to thoughtfully evaluate the potential self-lethality of anyone expressing suicidal thoughts who comes our way. In many instances that requires the person’s voluntary participation; in others they can be confined against their will. I believe that the commitment statutes for involuntary hospitalization to prevent self-harm have wisdom in insisting that committability depends on having a mental illness, not merely expressing the wish to end one’s life. I see the statutes abused in several ways — first, to confine people who, although they harm themselves in other ways, do not represent a threat to their lives or intend to end their lives; and second, to confine people who do not have a legitimate mental illness. I am particularly troubled by the “attention-getting” patient who makes gestural suicidal pronouncements or self-injurious acts but is at no greater than baseline suicide risk; our response merely reinforces the pathological attention-seeking and wastes increasingly scarce mental health resources. But in a litigious society, no one wants to take the risk of liability for having been wrong in their assessment of whether someone is truly self-lethal (and, of course, even a gesture can go wrong and mistakenly kill oneself), so nondiscerning crisis services and outpatient providers have everyone locked up — which is exactly why ASHers don’t talk to health professionals about how they feel. In this sense, groups like ASH may actually do a service, in several ways. First, by providing accurate information about suicide methodology, they may dissuade some from attempting at all, or influence them to postpone an otherwise impulsive act. Secondly, by making it clear how lethal various methods are, they make it less likely that a “gesturer” will mistakenly choose a lethal method. Thirdly, and most importantly, they tolerate how the person with suicidal ideation feels nonjudgmentally and supportively. This is what mental health professionals were once taught to do as the sine qua non in treating the suicidal patient, but it is a task at which we fall woefully short (for a coalescence of reasons enumerating which would be a treatise in itself). Often, not being heard or tolerated is the proximal precipitant to someone’s crossing the line and taking thir life.
“It was a new twist on interactive entertainment. In the summer of 2000, the makers of deadend.com, a road movie about three teens in a suicide pact, asked visitors to their website to e-mail story ideas. Wired News
‘We can do no great things, We can only do small things with great love.’ “An anti-war action is sweeping through the churches. It has worked before. It can work now. Everyone can do this:
Place 1/2 c. uncooked rice in a small plastic bag (a snack-sized bag or sandwich bag works fine).
Squeeze out excess air and seal the bag.
Wrap it in a piece of paper on which you have written: “If your enemies are hungry, feed them. (Romans 12:20)” Please send this rice to the people of Iraq; do not attack them.”
Place the paper and bag of rice in an envelope (either a letter-sized or small padded mailing envelope – both are the same cost to mail) and address it to:
President George Bush
White House – 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20500
Make a second package and mail it to (you don’t need to affix postage if mailing within Canada):
Prime Minister Jean Chrétien
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
[I’m not sure if it would make sense for non-Canadians to send the second one to Chrétien. This post is taken from the Thunder Bay, Ontario, IndyMedia Centre. — FmH]
Drop this in the mail today. It is important to act now so that President Bush and Prime Minister Chrétien get our letters as soon as possible!
In order for this protest to be effective, there must be hundreds of thousands of such rice deliveries to the White House and Parliament Hill. We can do this if we all forward this message to our friends and family. If we get the message out, there will be packets from hundreds of thousands of people!
There is a positive history of this protest! Read on!“
Neal Cassady (2/8/26-2/4/68) died <a href=”http://www.todayinliterature.com/today-ct.asp?id=2/4/2003
“>on this day.
“. . .’keep a step ahead, keep your mind ahead’ — (I heard his insistent voice) — ‘don’t butt your dumb head against their walls, man! – look for doors, and then GO – Just leave them snarled up in their worries, their motives – it’s their kick man, it’s their dreary high – But, listen – never knock the way the other cat swings.'”
Related: Why did John Perry Barlow spell Cassady’s name wrong in his heartfelt paean?
While we’re at it, here’s more from Go:
‘Last week l got the idea that the one aim of my intercourse with other people is to prevent them from noticing how brittle and will-less l have become,” Paul Hobbes was writing. ‘l cant seem to dance without a piper. Would you believe ill of me? l actually yearn for life to be easy, magic, full of love. How wonderful (and simple) it would be if we were all naked on a plain, as Gene Pasternak says. You probably wouldn’t like him at all, but l can learn something from him because he’s written an annoyingly good novel. And anyway he believes in himself, and also in life…. As of this moment, l only believe in the spring outside the window on Lexington Avenue, and in you. Is there spring up there on Riverside Drive too? Let’s all go out and be naked on a plain. . . .”
Angrily, Hobbes stopped typing, surrendering to his feeling that the letter was basically aimless. He pulled the sheet out of the machine, looked it over for a moment, thrust it aside, and got up. He began to walk noisily up and down the floor. It was after five and Pasternak had been sleeping since nine that morning.
Everything in sight made Hobbes impatient: the shelves he had built for their books, the borrowed frameless paintings on the walls, the couches in need of a brush; everything that he and his wife, Kathryn, had collected and arranged so carefully in the last years. They were not enough somehow; nor were his desk, his manuscripts, and the novel upon which he had been biting his nails too long. Only the soft spring evening, which hung like some impossibly romantic water-color behind the towers of midtown Manhattan, escaped his dissatisfaction. He was filled with that heightened sense of excitement and restlessness that spring brings to New York, when evening becomes graceful and warm with promise. A joy without object or reason rose within him, but like all such joys ebbed into frustration almost immediately because he did not know how to express it.
He went to the phonograph, pulled out an album and put on a soft jazz record. He did not want to keep quiet, he wanted everything to begin; but an overly-developed sense of propriety prevented him from going to the bedroom, and waking Pasternak with cruel brightness so they could talk. Instead he sat down again and began to re-read what he had written.
Embrace file-sharing, or die: “A record executive and his son make a formal case for freely downloading music. The gist: 50 million Americans can’t be wrong.” — John Snyder [president of Artist House Records, a board member of the National Association of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS), and a 32-time Grammy nominee], Salon
A week ago Sam Hamill sent an open letter — printed below — to a few friends. Word has spread like wildfire from mailbox to mailbox, and to date over 3,600 poets have submitted poems or personal statements to register their opposition to the Bush administration’s headlong plunge toward war in Iraq. In doing so, they have honored a long and rich tradition of thoughtful and moral opposition by poets and other artists to senseless and murderous policies, including those of our own government.
In the face of the near unanimous opposition from U.N. members, despite the disapproval of the vast majority of citizens of the world, in defiance of the advice of its own intelligence agencies, and contrary to both common sense and fundamental notions of morality, the Bush administration seems to be on a rocket sled headed for war.
The next few weeks will likely prove to be critical. Please register your protest and add your name to our numbers by submitting a poem or brief commentary. Be part of our National Day of Poetry Against the Waron February 12.
[Febuary 12th was to have been the day of the now-cancelled “Poetry and the American Voice” symposium at the White House. — FmH]
ghost rocket returns.
Comparisons between the Pentagon’s war plans for the looming war in Iraq and the Nazis’ bombing of the Basque village of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War in 1937 are rife. For a sampling, see this Google Search: ‘Guernica & Iraq’. As Gar Smith commented in Alternet:
U.S. military strategists have announced a plan to pummel Iraq with as many as 800 cruise missiles in the space of two days. Many of these missiles would rain down on Baghdad, a city of five million people. If George W. Bush gets the war he wants, Baghdad could become the 21st century’s Guernica.
On April 26, 1937, 25 Nazi bombers dropped 100,000 pounds of bombs and incendiaries on the peaceful Basque village. Seventy percent of the town was destroyed and 1,500 people, a third of the population, were killed.
The Pentagon now predicts that the Iraq blitzkrieg could approximate the devastation of a nuclear explosion. “The sheer size of this has never been … contemplated before,” one Pentagon strategist boasted to CBS News. “There will not be a safe place in Baghdad.”
The Pentagon dubbed its cold-blooded attack plan “Shock and Awe,” a bizarre conjunction of trauma and admiration.
A full-size reproduction of Picasso’s “Guernica”, which he donated to the U.N., hangs in its lobby and is the backdrop against which diplomats make their press statements. Now comes word that a large blue curtain has been used to cover the work. A U.N. spokesperson, asked why, would only say that the curtain is an “appropriate background for the cameras.” But it appears to be rather a matter of sensitivity to US mouthpieces such as Colin Powell or John Negroponte who would have to advocate for “Shock and Awe” in front of an overpowering depiction of women, children and animals shouting in horror as they are attacked from the skies. Art Daily [thanks, Adam]
In related art news, fittingly from the same day’s Art Daily as the above, Rubens’ early masterpiece “The Massacre of the Innocents” (1609-1610) will be on display at the National Gallery in London for three years on loan from the new owner who recently acquired it at a record-breaking auction, it has just been announced. Only recently affirmed to be a Rubens, the piece was so detested by its former owner that it was lent to a monastery until sold last fall.
Those crafty curators are always making statements with their art choices, aren’t they?
Finally, here’s a concise guide to The Art of War and Peace.
The Negro Speaks of Rivers — Langston Hughes
I’ve known rivers:
I’ve known rivers ancient as the world and older than the
flow of human blood in human veins.My soul has grown deep like the rivers.
I bathed in the Euphrates when dawns were young.
I built my hut near the Congo and it lulled me to sleep.
I looked upon the Nile and raised the pyramids above it.
I heard the singing of the Mississippi when Abe Lincoln
went down to New Orleans, and I’ve seen its muddy
bosom turn all golden in the sunset.I’ve known rivers:
Ancient, dusky rivers.My soul has grown deep like the rivers.
(for George W. Bush as one in a continuing series honoring ‘banned’ poets)
[One of my favorite Hughes’ pieces ever since Gary Bartz set it to sublime music thirty years ago. mark wood put up another of my favorites, “Let America Be America Again”, the other day in noting Hughes’ birthday. FmH]
“History will remember Derrida, and it surely will, not for what he himself has said but for what his revered status says about us.” — Mark Goldblatt, National Review
Do you want to know how you will die and when? Or would you rather live without that knowledge? Such a dilemma might only be expected to face characters in a science fiction novel or film. Until now.
The Observer can reveal that genetic tests that promise to foretell accurately our medical future are being sold in growing numbers across Britain.
Dubbed health ‘horoscopes’, they claim to be able to predict with certainty what illnesses you are likely to get throughout your lifetime by revealing inherited traits.
Delivered to your home wrapped like an expensive box of chocolates, the Genovations test offers people the opportunity to find out how likely it is they will suffer from heart disease, cancer, thrombosis, osteoporosis, asthma and a range of other serious medical problems. The Observer
Review — Extinction: Evolution and the End of Man by Michael Boulter: ‘Worried about overpopulation, pollution, dwindling natural resources and global warming? Well, the good news, according to British paleobiologist Michael Boulter, is that our selfish behavior as a species may not, in the long run, destroy our beautiful planet or most of the life forms that inhabit it. The bad news, however, is that our abuse probably will put an end to most of the larger mammals, in particular us, the soi-disant Homo sapiens, apparently less sapient than billed.
A professor of paleobiology at the University of East London, Boulter has been studying extinction, including the five major mass extinction events that have occurred since the beginning of life on Earth. The largest single factor in each case, he concludes, was radical change in the environment, leaving erstwhile flourishing species suddenly unable to survive. “Evolution,” Boulter explains, “is less to do with winning battles between species and individuals, more to do with being able to live well together in the same environment.” ‘ LA Times
Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness ed. by Bernard J. Baars, William P. Banks, and James B. Newman: “Consciousness is at the very core of the human condition. Yet only in recent
decades has it become a major focus in the brain and behavioral sciences.
Scientists now know that consciousness involves many levels of brain
functioning, from brainstem to cortex. The almost seventy articles in this book
reflect the breadth and depth of this burgeoning field. The many topics covered
include consciousness in vision and inner speech, immediate memory and
attention, waking, dreaming, coma, the effects of brain damage, fringe
consciousness, hypnosis, and dissociation.
Underlying all the selections are the questions, What difference does
consciousness make? What are its properties? What role does it play in the
nervous system? How do conscious brain functions differ from unconscious ones?
The focus of the book is on scientific evidence and theory.” amazon.com
![]()
God’s architect design for Twin Tower space? “Antoni Gaudi, the avant-garde architect of Barcelona’s Sagrada Familia church who could soon be beatified has become the latest candidate to design a replacement for New York’s destroyed World Trade Centre
Gaudi (1852-1926) was commissioned in 1908 to create a 366 metre skyscraper hotel for Lower Manhattan. Although the project was never realised, he left a spaceship-type design, topped by an observation platform in the shape of a giant glass star, which has now been submitted by a US-Spanish team of artists and academics.”
Walt Whitman (1819–1892), Leaves of Grass:
Of persons arrived at high positions, ceremonies, wealth, scholarships, and the like;To me, all that those persons have arrived at, sinks away from them, except as it results to their Bodies and Souls,
So that often to me they appear gaunt and naked;
And often, to me, each one mocks the others, and mocks himself or herself,
And of each one, the core of life, namely happiness, is full of the rotten excrement of maggots,
And often, to me, those men and women pass unwittingly the true realities of life, and go toward false realities,
And often, to me, they are alive after what custom has served them, but nothing more,
And often, to me, they are sad, hasty, unwaked sonnambules, walking the dusk
(dedicated to George W. Bush as one in a continuing series honoring ‘banned’ poets)
!['In the event of a moon disaster...' //www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky3/images/space4a.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky3/images/space4a.jpg)
Nixon was prepared for astronaut eulogies:
When man first landed on the moon 30 years ago, President Richard Nixon had a speech all ready in case man would not get off again.
A contingency statement was prepared for Mr. Nixon, an eerie, poignant tribute that he would deliver while the astronauts were still alive but when there was no longer any hope for them.
“Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace wills stay on the moon to rest in peace,” says the statement, incorporated in a memo titled “In Event of Moon Disaster.”
The memo is dated July 18, 1969, two days before the moon landing.
Mr. Nixon never had to act on it. Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin made it safely off the moon, back to the command module with Michael Collins, and home. The words were drafted by William Safire, then a Nixon speechwriter and now a columnist for the New York Times.
The memo ended up in the National Archives and was reported by the Los Angeles Times. Associated Press
‘Many of Andy Goldsworthy’s sculptures last only as long as nature allows. A new movie, ‘Rivers and Tides,’ captures his ephemeral efforts.’ Boston Globe I’ve loved Goldsworthy’s work since my time in Scotland years ago. It is time for a broader appreciation…
As I see it, here in the early 21st century, triage requires we look beyond our management-plan differences and unite to fight for all our Places, for all our kids — cowboys and Indians, multi-generational rancher and rural-refugee relative-newcomer (just more in a multi-millennial line of migrators) — or we’ll soon have nothing left to argue about. If we can’t look past our personal political agendas toward some deeper shared roots, then it just may be that all of the meaningful nooks and crannies left on the land will be engineered, profiteered, privatized, regulated, marketed, and paved away. We can argue about the details, but first we must unite against those who have no meaning of Place beyond the money that can be extracted from the land; and who, in that money-worshipping land-sacrificing, will suck the Place out of the places needed by those of us who still need that meaning. In a growth-buzz addicted culture, even the stems and seeds get smoked.
Here’s my new bumper sticker: Save the wild people. I envision next to that slogan the picture of a little kid giving the finger. — Ken Wright, The Exquisite Corpse Manifesto Issue
Outlaw manifesto of the century:
In March 1967, at the dawn of what became known as the summer of love, Otto Muehl published “ZOCK,” one of the most fanatical nihilist credos ever written. In this intense instance Otto might be compared to Sergei Nechaev–Dostoyevsky’s model for the fictional Verkhovensky in The Possessed–and his very real Catechism of the Revolutionist. Both manifestoes carried to an ultimate extreme lewdness and severity, of mystical satire in praxis. In both there are suggestions of older, shadowy millenarian uprisings, the writer depicting himself as a complete immoralist, bound to commit “any crime, any treachery, any baseness or deception” to create a New World order. The stories of Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, even Jesus and Judas are taken not as rogue elements but implicitly as paradigms of brotherhood, of fierce love. Both Nechaev and Muehl oppose history to project the future of mankind into a primordial time when communication between heaven and earth, gods and mortals, was not merely possible, but easy and within the reach of all mankind. In both there is an unstated belief in redemption through sin. Every acute and radical Utopianism that is taken seriously tears open an abyss in which by inner necessity these antinomian tendencies and libertarian moral conceptions gain strength. — William Levy, The Exquisite Corpse Manifesto Issue
Walt Whitman (1819–1892), Leaves of Grass:
79. Thought
Of obedience, faith, adhesiveness;
As I stand aloof and look,
there is to me something profoundly affecting in large masses of men,
following the lead of those who do not believe in men.
(dedicated to George W. Bush, as one of a series of posts honoring ‘banned’ poets)
!['Stately, plump Buck Mulligan...' //www.todayinliterature.com/assets/photos/j/james-joyce-190x287.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/www.todayinliterature.com/assets/photos/j/james-joyce-190x287.jpg)
“On this day in 1922, James Joyce’s fortieth birthday, Ulysses was first published. Joyce was very superstitious, and very apprehensive of a hostile reception for the novel that had been seven years in writing and sixteen years in gestation; he chose the birthday publication for luck.” Today in Literature
“A man who mistook a salami for an automatic pistol triggered a major police operation on Friday in southern Germany, involving 10 police cars and a helicopter.” Yahoo! News
Richard Reeves: “A foolish President brags about assassination: ‘ Oh, you don’t think that happens here? Americans don’t do such things?
If so, then you were not watching and listening carefully to the president last Tuesday night. I literally leaped out of my seat when Bush said this…’ [more]
![What do you do in your sleep?? //graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2003/01/29/magazine/02sleep.cover184.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2003/01/29/magazine/02sleep.cover184.jpg)
The Strange and the Beautiful: “It takes a while to figure out why Dr. Mark Mahowald’s grainy sleep-lab videos are so spooky. One immediate reason is the phenomena on the footage — a class of disorders called ”parasomnias,” which are defined as unwanted and involuntary behaviors during sleep and are by definition occult, because they appear when most people are unable to witness them. But even the scientists who stay up late by profession never quite get used to what they see.” NY Times
‘Many of Andy Goldsworthy’s sculptures last only as long as nature allows. A new movie, ‘Rivers and Tides,’ captures his ephemeral efforts.’ Boston Globe I’ve loved Goldsworthy’s work since my time in Scotland years ago. It is time for a broader appreciation…
In case you hadn’t heard, contact with the space shuttle Columbia was lost shortly after 9:00 a.m. Eastern time this morning as it began reentry from its recent orbital mission, heading for a landing in Florida. Multiple contrails were seen in the sky and debris has fallen over central Texas. There was no indication of any difficulties aboard the craft in prior communication with NASA. While not acknowledging that the vehicle had exploded or fragmented, NASA warned area residents of the dangers of the debris and cleanup crews are working in the area. There does not appear to be any possibility, it probably goes without saying, that any of the astronauts on the crew could have survived. Security for the flight was tight because of the presence of an Israeli astronaut, who had been selected in 1995 to be a guest on a US shuttle mission. There are no indications of terrorist actions in the shuttle’s destruction. Warnings From NASA on Falling Debris; Bush Calls Meeting NY Times. My thoughts are with the astronauts’ loved ones. Let’s hope there is not a media feeding frenzy upon their private grief in days to come.
Light Particles Are Duplicated More Than a Mile Away Along Fiber: ‘Employing a facet of quantum mechanics that Albert Einstein called “spooky action at a distance,” scientists have taken particles of light, destroyed them and then resurrected copies more than a mile away.
Previous experiments in so-called quantum teleportation moved particles of light about a yard. The findings could aid the sending of unbreakable coded messages, which is limited to a few tens of miles.
The new experiment used longer wavelengths of light than earlier ones, letting the scientists copy the light through standard glass fiber found in fiber optic cables.’ NY Times
The Tribal Rites of America’s Military Leaders:
‘This Saturday, more than a thousand of America’s top military and government leaders and their guests are scheduled to gather at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington, D.C., for a secretive tribal rite called the 103rd Annual Wallow of the Military Order of the Carabao. And they won’t be singing “Kumbaya.”
In fact, on what these days feels like the eve of war, nothing says “imperialism” better than the annual Wallow, which celebrates the bloody conquest of the nascent Philippine Republic a century ago in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War.’ Village Voice
Teresa Nielson Hayden goes in search of the truth about animal hoarding and writes a post several people have pointed me to. Lay readers will find the phenomenon disturbing and fascinating. As a psychiatrist I see more than my share of these folks coming to the attention of the mental health authorities and hospitalized on my service for being unable to care for themselves. While TNH, too simply, notes that “hoarding used to be thought of as an eccentricity, but more and more it’s being recognized as a social problem–and, more to the point, a form of mental illness”, there are delicate decisions and a complicated evaluative process to be faced in each given case to decide if it is evidence of psychiatric disturbance or merely an eccentricity of which an (often socially isolated) person should not be deprived and for which they should not be penalized with the loss of their autonomy. It may be both; the tolerable quirkiness of the longterm ‘cat lady’ may turn eventually — only in the end — to tragedy for both the animals and their benefactor when she (almost invariably a woman, almost invariably elderly) is disabled by physical or mental illness or inanition and no longer able to care for them. It is psychiatrically trendy to recognize hoarding as a symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (don’t forget, OCD is treated by the best-selling serotonin reuptake inhibitor class of antidepressants — Prozac and its cousins — and, if your favorite tool is a hammer, it pays to see everything as if it were a nail) and to lump animal hoarding in with other bizarre and out-of-control collecting pnehomena. This is too simple, however; in cases where animal hoarding is due to an illness, the definitive stroke in the person’s inability to care for herself and her animals is often a dementing process such as Alzheimer’s Disease or a late-life psychotic disorder instead.
One point that has struck me over and over again is how serendipitous it usually is that the squalor and misery in which such a person is living comes to anyone’s attention and provokes an intervention. TNH cites statistics about the estimated prevalence of the problem, but my strong instinct is that the recognized cases represent the tip of the iceberg. As such, they dramatize the epidemic of social neglect of the elderly in our society. I would love to see statistics of the prevalence of animal hoarding in other societies correlated with their community and social welfare infrastructure.
As she concludes her post, which does an impressive job of collecting and presenting what she has gleaned from intelligent googling on the topic, TNH starts to slide down the slippery slope of villifying — or citing sources which villify — the ‘cat ladies’ for their denial and their control motivations. Again, I would emphasize that this is tarring with a broad brush, and it is largely the brush of the animal welfare advocates who share the social prejudices about the odd, the different, the deviant, the offensive. Every case is different; some are harmless eccentrics; most are mentally ill and not in control, and needing help rather than prosecution (although I fully support the interventions of the animal welfare agencies and the health departments which often have to condemn the dwellings in which these unfortunate scenes have played themselves out). Very few are malevolent in their conscious intent.
Much of perception, learning and high-level cognition involves finding patterns in data. But there are always infinitely many patterns compatible with any finite amount of data. How does the cognitive system choose ‘sensible’ patterns? A long tradition in epistemology, philosophy of science, and mathematical and computational theories of learning argues that patterns ‘should’ be chosen according to how simply they explain the data. This article reviews research exploring the idea that simplicity drives a wide range of cognitive processes. We outline mathematical theory, computational results and empirical data that underpin this viewpoint. Trends in Cognitive Science [via BioMedNet]
Tubers, scavenging, and women — “this might have been the winning combination that spurred human evolution about 2 millions years ago, according to a provocative hypothesis by American anthropologists.
Writing in the current issue of the Journal of Human Evolution, University of Utah anthropologist James O’Connell and colleagues challenge the conventional wisdom that meat, brought home by man the hunter and shared out, fueled the rise of early humans.” Discovery
Think of any two numbers. Make a third by adding the first and second, a fourth by adding the second and third, and so on. When you have written down about 20 numbers, calculate the ratio of the last to the second from last. The answer should be close to 1.6180339887… [Technically, this is the number which is one more than its reciprocal, i.e. the solution to the equation x-1=1/x, which is 1/2(1+sqrt[5]). — FmH]
What’s the significance of this number? It’s the “golden ratio” and, arguably, it crops up in more places in art, music and so on than any number except pi. Claude Debussy used it explicitly in his music and Le Corbusier in his architecture. There are claims the number was used by Leonardo da Vinci in the painting of the Mona Lisa, by the Greeks in building the Parthenon and by ancient Egyptians in the construction of the Great Pyramid of Khufu. Guardian UK
Primates found popping prenatal drug: “A Madagascan lemur has been revealed as the first animal known to
self-medicate when pregnant. Female sifaka eat plants rich in poisonous
tannins in the weeks before giving birth, researchers have discovered.
It is unclear why the sifaka does this. In other mammals, small doses of
tannins kill parasites and stimulate milk production. And vets often use
tannins to prevent miscarriage, raising the intriguing possibility that by
eating the plants the sifaka is protecting its developing baby.” New Scientist
“A steady diet of hamburgers, fries and foods high in fat and loaded with calories may not only pile on the pounds — some scientists are questioning whether it could be addictive.
Researchers who have been testing the biological effects of fast foods are discovering that they can trigger hormonal changes in the body which could make it difficult to control eating.” NY Times
“The ultra-modern view of consciousness turns science upside down, writes Colin Tudge in The Guardian: “Is the brain simply a computer, and is consciousness merely the feeling we get when we think? Or is consciousness a primary component of the universe, which the brain can latch on to, like a radio receiver? A definitive answer will always be elusive, but scientists are making intriguing forays into the subject, and if they are not explaining consciousness, they are certainly telling us a great deal about the nature of science.”
Lie Detection: “A new technique which interprets facial gestures has been developed by scientists at Manchester Metropolitan University and could be the most accurate lie detector yet created. ‘Silent Talker’ detects and analyses the thousands of “microgestures” which indicate someone might be telling untruths and which go unnoticed by both trained and untrained professionals.” BBC