Unknown's avatar

About FmH

70-something psychiatrist, counterculturalist, autodidact, and unrepentent contrarian.

TiVo unveils audience measuring –

“TiVo Inc., a maker of television-recording devices, Monday unveiled a TV audience measuring system that allows it to report the second-by-second viewing habits of its subscribers to advertisers and network programmers.” MSNBC You didn’t think you were getting all that functionality without a cost, did you? Still, DVRs are such a leap forward that anyone with the slightest interest in watching television is a fool for not taking the leap. Here’s the deal, if you need to be convinced (and most people do, because the devices haven’t really caught on, in one of the most puzzling examples of looking gift horses in the mouths). NY Times

From Distant Galaxies, News of a ‘Stop-and-Go Universe’ –

“New observations of exploding stars far deeper in space, astronomers say, have produced strong evidence that the proportions of the mysterious forces dominating the universe have undergone radical change over cosmic history.

The findings, reported here at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society, which ended Thursday, supported the idea that once the universe was expanding at a decelerating rate but then began accelerating within the last seven billion years, scientists concluded.” NY Times

Is the Body More Beautiful When It’s Dead?

//www.freimaurerei-dithmarschen.de/grafik/mem_mori1.jpg' cannot be displayed]

“In the end, it would appear that (the) real crime (is) to meddle with a set of unspoken cultural taboos in a city that does not take such matters lightly. Death at a historical or emotional remove may provide safe entertainment, but death in actual fact still scares us.” — Eleanor Heartney, author of Post modern Heretics: The Catholic Imagination in Contemporary Art‘ to be published in February (NY Times)

The Rise of a Bigger, Better Taliban –

“We told you so.

We warned the Bush Administration that invading Iraq would destabilize the Middle East and spread radical anti-American Islamism. We told the American people that taking out Saddam Hussein without a viable government to replace him would open a vacuum for anarchy, civil war and a power grab by radical Iranian-backed Shiite clerics. Now the antiwar movement’s doomsday scenarios have been fulfilled so completely that military history scarcely mentions a more thoroughly botched endeavor — and we’ll be living with the fallout for years.


When we argued that Donald Rumsfeld’s low-budget occupation of Iraq would turn out as disastrously as it had in Afghanistan, right-wing Republicans called us stupid and un-American. Now that we’ve been proven correct on every count, is it too much to expect an apology? Maybe so. Given George W. Bush’s performance on the economy and the war on terrorism (where’s Osama? Saddam? the WMDs? the surplus?), betting against him hardly makes one a prophet. And no one is less pleased with the speed and totality of the Iraqi catastrophe than those of us who called it in advance.” — Ted Rall, AlterNet

Some Back Home Wonder:

‘Why Are People Dying?’

Even as Americans viewed the conflict with Iraq as mostly over and the nation’s attention turned elsewhere, the Department of Defense reported the deaths of about 40 service members in the past six weeks. About three-fourths of the deaths came after May 1, the day President Bush formally declared the end of major combat operations. Deaths over the past six weeks were fewer than at the height of the struggle: three times as many Americans were killed in the month after the war began. But for families who had just begun to allow themselves to think their loved ones might be safe, the news was all the more jarring, the numbers impossible to consider. NY Times

Internet Battle Raises Questions About the First Amendment.

“…The order, entered by Judge Diana Lewis of Circuit Court in West Palm Beach, forbids Mr. Max to write about Ms. Johnson. It has alarmed experts in First Amendment law, who say that such orders prohibiting future publication, prior restraints, are essentially unknown in American law. Moreover, they say, claims like Ms. Johnson’s, for invasion of privacy, have almost never been considered enough to justify prior restraints.

Ms. Johnson’s lawsuit also highlights some shifting legal distinctions in the Internet era, between private matters and public ones and between speech and property…” NY Times Here’s a mirror of the essay in question which the judge enjoined the author from posting on his website, courtesy of a reader at Declan McCullagh’s Politech mailing list, who comments:

In order to facilitate further public discussion of this controversy, I have reproduced the disputed essay below. Given the blatant unconstitutionality of the court’s actions, which include forbidding Mr. Max from even linking to Ms. Johnson’s web site, I predict this order will be reversed shortly. Now that Mr. Max has legal representation, the entire case will likely be thrown out in short order, unless Ms. Johnson decides to add a claim of libel… I have no personal knowledge of and make no claims as to the truthfulness of any part of Mr. Max’s essay, but it is my understanding that Ms.Johnson has not thus far sued him for libel, only for invasion of privacy. Ms. Johnson is indisputably a public figure who holds herself out as a moral example, so the requirements for proving either libel or invasion of privacy would be quite high.

Caveat: there’s nothing of any merit in the essay beyond the First Amendment issues the case raises. It is not any more a flattering picture of Mr. Max than it is of Ms. Johnson. If you can bear not to, don’t bother reading it, or at least keep an emesis basin nearby. I am glad, however, that the essay was mirrored. Weighing the civil liberties issues is more challenging but more compelling when the self-expression is so utterly without merit.

A 12-Step Program for Regime Change –

“(B)y focusing on what we have in common – the clear-cut goal of defeating Bush in 2004 – we can all succeed. How important is this? It feels more important than anything we will do for a very long time.

To help us chart our course, what follows is a 12-step program to achieve regime change. As in all such efforts for change, we need to take an inventory of our strengths and our weaknesses, confront our bad habits and addictions, reach out to others, and recover our power. ” — Don Hazen, AlterNet

Emperor’s New Clothes Dept. I:

How in the world does the accidental apprehension of Eric Rudolph by a rookie cop in Murphy NC, who didn’t even know whom he was arresting,

“(send) a clear message that we will never cease in our efforts to hunt down all terrorists, foreign or domestic, and stop them from harming the innocent”,

as Ashcroft crows? San Diego Union Tribune [Next we’ll be hearing he has links with al Qaeda, since all terrorists apparently do…]

Also consider for a moment the Christian Science Monitor‘s take on the capture, FBI usually does get its man, even if tardily. I remember realizing as a kid watching some TV cop drama, perhaps Dragnet, that the “crime does not pay” message was a desperate social fiction of those invested in maintaining the illusion of law ‘n’ order as it broke down around them. As Rafe Coburn points out,

“The most interesting thing… about this case is that it demonstrates just how hard it will ever be to capture someone like Osama bin Laden or Mullah Omar in Afghanistan. It took us over six years to capture Rudolph, and in the end he was captured by accident by local law enforcement. I don’t see the sheriff of some town in the badlands of Afghanistan picking up Osama bin Laden rummaging through a dumpster.”

While the New York Times observes today that Sympathy for Bombing Suspect May Cloud Search for Evidence, it also evidently clouded the search for the man himself for all these years. Although he was foraging for food when discovered and has lost perhaps 50 lbs., he was also obviously sheltered, supported, and well-fed for much of his fugitive time rather than living the survivalist existence in the mountains assumed by the focus of the federal manhunt.

Emperor’s New Clothes Dept. II:

Bush: ‘We Found’ Banned Weapons: President Bush, citing two trailers that U.S. intelligence agencies have said were probably used as mobile biological weapons labs, said U.S. forces in Iraq have “found the weapons of mass destruction” that were the United States’ primary justification for going to war.


In remarks to Polish television at a time of mounting criticism at home and abroad that the more than two-month-old weapons hunt is turning up nothing, Bush said that claims of failure were “wrong.”
Washington Post

Mental Disorders and Microarrays:

“With an estimated 44 million adults affected, chances are that you know someone with a mental disorder. Many scientists believe that a variety of these brain ailments arise from complicated interactions between multiple genes and the environment. Now new technologies, including a tool known as a microarray that allows researchers to evaluate thousands of genes in a single experiment, are helping push the field forward. In examples of recent work, microarray studies provided insights into how sets of genes link to depression and schizophrenia. Altogether, new findings are helping researchers better understand the underpinnings of mental disease so they can develop improved treatments.” Brain Briefings

(Society for Neuroscience)

Laugh and the World Laughs With You – New Study –

Over Time, People ‘Catch Mood’ of Friends, Lovers

It seems that couples and roommates tend to have similar emotional reactions as time goes by. So if your roommate or lover laughs out loud at movies or gets weepy over hurt puppies, you may too — given time.


This so-called emotional convergence seems to be beneficial to friendships and romantic relationships, making them stronger and longer lasting.


Everyday experience suggests that people are capable of “catching” the mood of a spouse or friend, said lead author Dr. Cameron Anderson. But he told Reuters Health that he was surprised by the extent to which peoples’ emotions converged in his study, which is reported in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Yahoo! News

As the article points out, however, an alternative explanation is that similarity of emotional reactions may predispose for relationship persistence. The study did not demonstrate that reactions become more similar over time, longitudinally. If its hypothesis is true, however, one way to think about this is to reconceptualize emotions as properties of the interpersonal field rather than the individuals. Not a novel concept in psychiatry; for example, it is the grounding of many family interaction theories with enduring psycholigical pedigree, and of revered psychiatrist Harry Stack Sullvan’s interpersonal psychiatry. This way of thinking about things also resonates with the new neurobiological findings about our emotional resonance circuitry to which I point in the post below this one.

Curious why it is a visceral human tendency to ‘own’ emotions as internal rather than conceive of them interpersonally. One possibility — it certainly seems important to draw distinct boundaries of the self and sort phenomena into definitively into ‘mine’ and ‘not-mine.’ There are serious consequences of the failure to do that. I have long argued that extreme social dysfunction such as schizophrenia is first and foremost a disorder of this boundary-drawing function, which by the way has its own neurobiological circuitry. Not agreeing with the consensus notions of where you end and the rest of the world begins is a profoundly alienating and alarming existential state.

Emotion Gets Physical:

Misleadingly vague title for a very important finding.

Preliminary observations of stroke patients with problems relating emotionally to others suggest that in order to feel empathy, people must be able to imitate the actions of others. In other words, to understand what others are feeling, you must put yourself physically in their shoes.

Stroke can damage any area of the brain, but the patients in question all have lesions to one particular brain structure – the insula, which lies between the frontal and temporal lobes on both sides of the brain.

On tests of their ability to gauge the emotions being experienced by people from their facial expressions in photographs, these patients perform very poorly compared to healthy controls.

…(I)f the insula does turn out to be the key to their emotional deficit, it would fit very well with data … on the neural correlates of empathy.

Understanding the linkages between brain and social behavior is one of the frontiers of neuroscience with immense implications. A crucial concept only recently elucidated is that of “mirror neurons”, of which longtime FmH readers will know I have previously written. Here’s a link to Ramachandran’s discussion of the notion several years ago at The Edge.

Mental Disorders and Microarrays:

“With an estimated 44 million adults affected, chances are that you know someone with a mental disorder. Many scientists believe that a variety of these brain ailments arise from complicated interactions between multiple genes and the environment. Now new technologies, including a tool known as a microarray that allows researchers to evaluate thousands of genes in a single experiment, are helping push the field forward. In examples of recent work, microarray studies provided insights into how sets of genes link to depression and schizophrenia. Altogether, new findings are helping researchers better understand the underpinnings of mental disease so they can develop improved treatments.” Brain Briefings

(Society for Neuroscience)

No Rebound –

‘Even all the boring white guys got tattoos now.’

Like an aging sitcom that keeps getting moved to a worse and worse time slot, Dennis Rodman’s celebrity is near cancellation. Rodman, by 1998 second to his teammate Michael Jordan in name recognition among basketball players, has no endorsements, no public appearances and few prospects. Rodman’s collapse is classic American overexposure. Call it the Action Figure Syndrome. From William Shatner to Mr. T, few survive being molded into 11 inches of plastic. It’s a sign that America has made your acquaintance, fallen in love and gorged on your image. And we all know what happens next in romance and marketing: boredom followed by contempt. Today, it’s a short road from the cover of GQ to a throwaway line in Conan’s monologue. NY Times Magazine

The tragedy is that Rodman, like many others, does not realize what process he is victim of.

Fireworks Shows Put in Doubt by New Rules –

Small towns across America could be without fireworks this Fourth of July if federal agencies can’t settle on new homeland security restrictions on shipments by train.

“It’s getting stupid. Do they really think a terrorist will use a firecracker to blow up a building?” said Don Lantis, of North Sioux City, S.D., whose family-owned pyrotechnics company puts on 300 to 400 shows around the country every Independence Day. ABC News

Should Arab Comics Make Terror Funny?

Some pretty in-your-face humor, or at least in Ashcroft’s and Ridge’s faces. Of course, John Stossel finds this phenomenon disquieting. Of course I say go for it…

“I’m normal, people, just like you. I put my pants on one leg at a time, strap on a bomb, go to work.”

“There’s only one thing I’ve got to say about racial profiling: It’s awesome. Seriously. Look at me. I got my ass kicked all through high school. And now, people are actually scared of me.”

“No guys, that’s a lie. I’m not Iranian. I was Iranian for 23 years up until Sept. 11th and now I’m Puerto Rican because that makes life a lot easier. That’s what’s happened to the entire Middle Eastern population: they’ve all become blacks, Latinos and dark Italians…”

“Did you guys see this Dan Rather interview with Saddam Hussein on prime-time TV, right before we’re trying to kill the guy, he’s on prime-time TV, and he challenged President Bush to a debate. Did you guys hear about that? How unfair was that? Going right for our president’s weakness — speaking English.”

“We’re all going to be arrested by the FBI after the show. I hope you guys enjoyed, hope you’re enjoying the show. Hope you’ll visit me in the detainment camp.”

Thanks for the memory…

…with your DNA in tree:

Two art students are planning to grow trees containing the genetic identity of human beings.


The idea is to replace the unused “junk” DNA in trees with entire human genomes. Scientists have advised the pair that it is perfectly feasible.


The “humanised” trees would be unaffected by the change, but still carry the biological essence of the DNA donors. One possibility envisaged is that the trees could replace gravestones as a way of preserving the memory of loved ones. Telegraph/UK

Walt Whitman envisioned this a century and a half ago:

I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,

If you want me again look for me under your boot-soles.

— from Song of Myself (1855)

Mockup Wing Is Torn by Foam in Shuttle Test –

I’ve been having a hard time understanding the foam hypothesis for the damage that caused the Columbia disaster, but in an independent experiment a 1.67-lb. chunk of foam shot from a gas cannon at around 530 mph at a fullscale mockup of a shuttle wing produced a worrisome gap when it struck a glancing blow on the very first attempt. The mockup, of fiberglass, is if anything more resiliant than the esoteric carbon fiber of the real thing. Like me, investigators were apparently skeptical before the experiment:

“Investigators have already concluded that a hole in the shuttle’s left wing let in the superheated gases that destroyed the wing, and they knew that a piece of foam struck the wing on launching. But they would not have been able to link the two convincingly without experimental evidence, and some of them had been worried that the experiments might not produce any wing damage.” NY Times

Another report says that the foam may have done its damage by dislodging a ‘T’ seal between two segments of the wing, opening up a gap along a seam. Analysis of a recorded radar echo of a piece of debris that flew off from the wing after the chunk of foam hit it suggests it is consistent with a ‘T’ shape.

Broadband A Go-Go –

In city after city, high-speed wireless access may be the next Internet revolution. But don’t go out warchalking; this is not your mother’s WiFi:

“I’ve got a Dell laptop on my knees and the wind is in my (very short) hair. I’ve got as many windows open as a beach house in summer—Google searches and instant messages to my wife; in the background, a new batch of e-mails downloads and my hometown public radio station streams on. It’s the usual cruise down the information superhighway at 2 Mb/s.

But I’m also hurtling down an actual superhighway—U.S. Interstate 4, at a very real 115 km/h. I’m in a Ford Mustang convertible, under cotton-ball clouds and a postcard-blue Florida sky. The Dell is outfitted with a prototype card that communicates with a test network set up by broadband wireless start-up MeshNetworks Inc.


(…)

Mesh is the only company to have figured out how to dynamically hand devices off from one access point to another at broadband data rates and six-lane freeway velocities. But beyond that, Mesh, along with Ricochet and other wireless point-to-point networks, are the best hope for a fully mobile future—a world where we can teleconference each other, watch news and entertainment in real time, order from online catalogs, pay our bills, and answer e-mail—anywhere, anytime, on ever smaller and sleeker handheld devices powered by ever more powerful microprocessors and software.” IEEE Spectrum

Beekeeper clears huge swarm of honeybees from downtown –

Thanks to Adam for this: swarm of more than 12,000 honeybees turned a downtown electronic walk/don’t walk sign into a makeshift beehive before the owner of a beekeeping equipment company coaxed the bees into a hive box below the traffic light.


Coincidentally, the bees had camped out Thursday just below the sixth-floor offices of Gary Johnson, the owner of Minnesota Package Bees, who was called on to help capture and remove the bees from the busy intersection.

Decked out head-to-toe in a white bee suit and mask, Johnson carried honeycomb frames up a ladder near the sign. Within minutes, thousands of bees flocked to the frames, while others hovered nearby.

No stings were reported. The bees were so engorged with honey that they couldn’t sting, Johnson said. Mpls. Star Tribune

A similarly-sized swarm in New Mexico made the news this week also.

‘Duh’ Dept:

Research funded by drug companies is ‘biased’: “Research funded by drug companies is more likely to produce results that favour the sponsor’s product, reveals a new study.

Researchers analysed 30 previous reports examining pharmaceutical industry-backed research and found the conclusions of such research were four times more likely to be positive than research backed by other sponsors.” New Scientist And lest we forget, there is a more fundamental bias in the reporting of research findings — that positive results (confirming a research hypothesis) are far more likely to be reported than negative (disconfirmatory) ones. This alone may go a long way to explain the bias in pharmaceutical-funded research, since a researcher seeking a grant is more likely to ‘pitch’ a favorable hypothesis to them.

Bush’s Basket –

Why the President Had to Show His Balls: “In the annals of infotainment, few moments match the sight of George Bush leaping from the cockpit of a fighter jet and striding across the deck of a carrier at sea. Top Gun: The Pseudo Event enchanted the public, horrified liberals, and galvanized the press. Suddenly media mavens noticed that Bush’s handlers have elevated the photo-op to pure cinema. So what else is new?


Actually there was something novel about this occasion, but it passed utterly below the radar. Discretion prevented anyone from mentioning that Bush’s outfit gave him a very vivid basket. This was the first a time a president literally showed his balls. Check it out—your subconscious already has.” — Richard Goldstein, Village Voice

Goldstein goes on to explore the implications. Thank heavens I don’t watch TV news coverage.

Cleaning Up Bush’s Image on Film:

Official, Histrionic, Account of White House response to 9-11:

Trapped on the other side of the country aboard Air Force One, the President has lost his cool: “If some tinhorn terrorist wants me, tell him to come and get me! I’ll be at home! Waiting for the bastard!”


His Secret Service chief seems taken aback. “But Mr. President . . .”


The President brusquely interrupts him. “Try Commander-in-Chief. Whose present command is: Take the President home!”


Was this George W. Bush’s moment of resolve on Sept. 11, 2001? Well, not exactly. Actually, the scene took place this month, on a Toronto sound stage.


The histrionics, filmed for a two-hour television movie to be broadcast this September, are as close as you can get to an official White House account of its activities at the outset of the war on terrorism. Globe and Mail

The New Rules of Politics

Discerning commentator EJ Dionne writes in the Washington Post: “Bush promised to change the ways of Washington. He has succeeded brilliantly, but not by creating the “new tone of respect and bipartisanship” he promised in 2000. The new tone in Washington is not bipartisan but hyperpartisan. “Bipartisanship is another name for date rape,” said White House ally Norquist, according to the Denver Post this week, as he promised to bring Washington’s new ferocity to the state capitals.


With ruthless brilliance, the White House is wielding power through the unrelenting imposition of party discipline. As a result, Bush will certainly help at least one industry in a troubled economy. All the textbooks pronouncing the death of political parties will have to be pulped and rewritten, creating who knows how many jobs.”

Essentially, Dionne opines that, in the good ol’ days, such a slim, partisan margin would result in compromise and bipartisanship, but now no matter how slim the advantage, it is now used as an opportunity to run rampant. And, I would add, even if the Democrats can take the White House in 2004 — the prospects for which look exceedingly dismal given their inchoate ineffectuality* and the deathgrip the Republicans have on the terms of the public debate — the next administration’s ability to govern democratically, such as it were, will have been immutably crippled on the domestic front by the massive Bush increases in the public debt and in the foreign relations arena by our unilateralism and squandering of the goodwill of the world community and our erstwhile allies.

*Although Howard Dean seems to be catching many people’s imagination, dismissing the rest of the Democratic field as ‘Bush lite” and speaking remarkable common sense. At least he is willing to clearly differentiate himself. If the Greens hold to their seeming dawning recognition that there really might be a difference this time around between reelecting Bush and the right Democrat and refrain from mounting a challenge from the left, we might see a real ideologically cast race.

Wolfowitz: WMD were a pretext for war –

The Bush administration focused on alleged weapons of mass destruction as the primary justification for toppling Saddam Hussein by force because it was politically convenient, a top-level official at the Pentagon has acknowledged.


The extraordinary admission comes in an interview with Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Defence Secretary, in the July issue of the magazine Vanity Fair.

It increasingly emerges not only that we are lied to — no surprise — but that it is an explicit instrument of policy to do so. Wolfowitz goes on to make explicit what I’ve said several times was the most compelling hidden agenda for the war:


Mr Wolfowitz also discloses that there was one justification that was “almost unnoticed but huge”. That was the prospect of the United States being able to withdraw all of its forces from Saudi Arabia once the threat of Saddam had been removed. Since the taking of Baghdad, Washington has said that it is taking its troops out of the kingdom. “Just lifting that burden from the Saudis is itself going to the door” towards making progress elsewhere in achieving Middle East peace, Mr Wolfowitz said. The presence of the US military in Saudi Arabia has been one of the main grievances of al-Qa’ida and other terrorist groups. Independent/UK

This is the way, then, that the invasion of Iraq did actually fit in the minds of the Bush cabal with the WoT® agenda, although their halfhearted attempts to assert that they were related were unconvincing. Not being explicit during the buildup to the war about its meeting basically longterm strategic rather than emergent defensive goals, one has to wonder about why it becomes acceptable to admit it immediately upon completion fo the war effort. Wolfowitz is no fool; I suppose he is confident no one is listening now, or that anyone who is has no power to do anything with their upset.


Related: The dysadmnistration’s disingenuousness has a Lewis-Carroll-like illogicality. Justifications seem to be cobbled together, invented on the fly, and have little coherency with one another.

Iraqi “intellectual capacity” for producing unconventional weapons was sufficient justification for the successful U.S.-led war against the country, a senior Bush administration official said today, addressing criticism that U.S. forces so far have found no illicit weapons there.

(…)

Explicitly addressing the lack of WMD stocks found in Iraq so far, Bolton said, “There has been a lot of misunderstanding as to exactly what it was we expected to find and when we expected to find it.”


Since the first Gulf War, he said, “The most fundamental, most important thing that was not destroyed [by international weapons inspectors] was the intellectual capacity in Iraq to recreate systems of weapons of mass destruction.”

spacenamespace:

“this is a kind of collaborative mapping project. it consists of geographical models which are represented as RDF graphs. you can wander round them, like a MUD or MOO, with a bot interface which you can use to create and connect new places.


it is an experiment in gonzo geographical data collection, with location grid data extrapolated from and converted between different sources on the internet, and new connections made between them.


it is a semantic web project; it provides a scheme for semantic web identification of places via unique uris. the interaction with people aspect uses FOAF, in the hope that friend-of-a-friend networks can benefit from collaborative filtering as well as collaborative mapping.


there is a model of london which has an instant messenger bot interface and is addressable via the web.”

Depth of Field:

//www.neumu.net/depthoffield/images/photos/02stockdale/stockdale02net.jpg' cannot be displayed]

Andrew Stockdale’s Central London: “My work has a consistent aesthetic vision. My images transform people and their environments into an epic visual that makes a strong graphic statement. Generally, I’m interested in portraying my own slant on reality.

The images featured (here) were taken around Central London during the past month. I’ve found many parts of London to be quite neglected, and this series focuses on some of them. I’ve aimed to visualize the beauty found in rubbish, vandalism and poverty.” neumu

‘Hippies from Hell’:

A documentary by Prix du Genève award winner Ine Poppe about a group of Dutch hackers, techies, artists, writers, and puzzlers known as the “Hippies From Hell” is now available for free online.


These Dutch hackers, as they were referred to initially, are a special group within the international hacker scene, which they played a major role in forming. The film contains rare footage from some Dutch hackers who would not speak to the media, but speak freely here. In the 1980’s they published hacker magazine Hack-Tic and in 1993 they started the first Dutch Internet provider, xs4all.


The documentary also features the rising of the lockpick sport club TOOOL, and takes you along on a trip to various European open air hacker conferences.


The 53 minute documentary can be downloaded for free at http://hippies.waag.org in DIVX format, Quicktime streaming, and downloadable Quicktime video. 2600

Behind the Six Degrees of SARS:

“Researchers are creating mathematical models based upon the ‘six

degrees of separation’ idea
to understand how social interaction

contributes to the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome.” Wired News

This may be related to the idea of the ‘superspreader’ implicated in the pattern of contagion of SARS. While most considerations about the superspreader phenomenon have assumed that superspreaders are more contagious than others (as a consequence of their own immunological characteristics or something about the strain of the virus they carry), models of the ‘small world’ or ‘six degrees’ phenomenon depend on a small number of nodal individuals who mix with large numbers of others and form bridges or short circuits in social connectivity. Malcolm Gladwell wrote about this ‘granularity’ of the six degrees of separation in this way in a celebrated New Yorker article in 1999, for example. Perhaps the superspreaders are analogous and should be examined for their connectivity rather than their virulence? On the other hand, instead of watching our hands or our feet, perhaps we should be looking to the stars to understand the epidemiology of SARS.

Who controls the airwaves?

A Common Cause petition drive: “The FCC is considering fundamental changes

to the media ownership regulations that will affect all of us. Despite the

immense impact of the proposed changes, the FCC has held only one formal

public hearing on the issue. While the public has largely been unaware and

uninvolved in the issue, the nation’s largest broadcast companies – which

could reap huge benefits from the elimination of these ownership rules –

have spent tens of millions of dollars on lobbying and political

contributions in Washington.

Join other Americans in telling FCC Chairman Michael Powell to delay the June 2nd vote on media consolidation and oppose relaxing the current ownership rules.”

Swallowing the lesser of evils?

Greens Consider Standing Behind Democrats in ’04: “As the Green Party hashes out its plans for next year’s presidential election, some of its activists are urging the party to forgo the race and, instead, throw its support behind one of the Democratic candidates — all in the hopes of unseating President Bush.” Washington Post

About time, although probably closing the barn door after the horse is gone; once you regret how you used your swing vote, it is not likely you will have a chance to be that pivotal again…

Anti-telemarketing –

the EGBG counterscript: “The Direct Marketing sector regards the telephone as one of its most successful tools. Consumers experience telemarketing from a completely different point of view: more than 92% perceive commercial telephone calls as a violation of privacy.

Telemarketers make use of a telescript – a guideline for a telephone conversation. This script creates an imbalance in the conversation between the marketer and the consumer. It is this imbalance, most of all, that makes telemarketing successful. The EGBG Counterscript attempts to redress that balance.” Brilliant. You can print out a .pdf of the counterscript to keep next to your phone for instant deployment. For a long time, I have asked telemarketers for their home phone number and, when they inevitably balk at giving it to me, I wonder aloud why then they presume to call me at home… just before hanging up. This is a quantum leap beyond that as a kultur-jam[thanks, walker]

Into the Blogosphere:

Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs: (ed. by the University of Minnesota Blog Collective). “The editors invite submissions for a new online edited collection exploring discursive, visual, and other communicative features of weblogs. We are interested in submissions that analyze and critique situated cases and examples drawn from weblogs and the weblog community. Although we are open to a wide range of scholarly approaches, our primary interest is in essays that comment upon specific features of the weblog and that treat the weblog as always a part of a larger community network.” Too bad the execrable term blogosphere seems to be catching on…

Earth and Moon as seen from Mars:


//mars.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/images/20030522a-03_hr.jpg' cannot be displayed]

“This is the first image of Earth ever taken from another planet that actually shows our home as a planetary disk. Because Earth and the Moon are closer to the Sun than Mars, they exhibit phases, just as the Moon, Venus, and Mercury do when viewed from Earth. As seen from Mars by MGS [Mars Global Surveyor] on 8 May 2003 at 13:00 GMT (6:00 AM PDT), Earth and the Moon appeared in the evening sky.” And here’s Jupiter from the MGS:


//mars.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/images/20030522a-04_br.jpg' cannot be displayed]

NASA/JPL

Matrix Metrics:

//www.criterionpic.com/cpl/images/lcl_matrixreloadedposter.jpg' cannot be displayed]

I saw the Matrix Reloaded the other day and won’t hesitate to say (even if the hatemail starts spewing in) that I found it disappointing. I’m in good company in saying so, IMHO.

You’re not supposed to be able to follow it unless you were into the first Matrix film… but I was. And it is de rigeur to dis Keanu Reeves… but I find his laconic minimalist non-acting has a sort of appeal. So it’s not that. I just found its plotting incoherent and arbitrary. Sorry, those failings offend my minimal expectations of a film, and no amount of <a href=”http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/30747.html

“>hacker cred (The Register)

or rock-’em-sock-’em action can compensate. Although it is tempting to hope for a coherent and overpoweringly subversive paradigm-buster to be this popular (“The left has been content to release memes into their own marginal subcultures for far to long. The Matrix unleashes memes into the heart of pop culture…”), it won’t amount to anything.

I’m nagged by the thought, though, that I would have grasped the logic better if I hadn’t been severely jetlagged (I saw it in SF where I was out for a conference) at the time. And perhaps I would grasp its logic better if I saw it again. But I couldn’t put up with that.

I did sort of like the Agent Smiths, although I was preoccupied throughout with what relationship he/they have to other contemporary Men in Black like Smith and Jones. By the way, I find credible the speculation that Smith could turn out to be an ally of The One (anything is possible in these scripts, right?) in the third episode due out this fall. Which (sigh) I’ll probably see, especially because it’ll be the first feature film out simultaneously on IMAX format, I read.

As an aside, I knew he looked familiar, but it was so out of context (wait; maybe not) that I hadn’t realized until I happened upon it here that Councilman West was a cameo appearance of none other than Cornel West.

Our Final Century:

The Spectator reviews a gloomy book by an eminent scientist which gives humankind around 50-50 odds of surviving the next century. While the nuclear threat has receded, he claims (and I am not certain it has), it will be overshadowed by equally destructive but far less controllable threats which

may come not primarily from national governments, not even from ‘rogue states’, but from individuals or small groups with access to ever more advanced technology. There are alarmingly many ways in which individuals will be able to trigger catastrophe.

But fear not; there’s a chance an errant asteroid or comet will finish us off, mercifully, first.

‘A rotter, a snake oil salesman, a chancer’ –

how scientist’s obituary sparked a storm:

It was expected to be a laudatory précis of a life of achievement, a straightforward assessment of the career of a distinguished pharmaceutical expert.


But the obituary of David Horrobin that has just been published in the British Medical Journal falls considerably short of that expectation. Instead it presents a grimly unpleasant image of a conniving opportunist. The scientist ‘may prove to be the greatest snake oil salesman of his age’, it claims.


And the article goes on. Associates described him as ‘a rotter… given to avoiding his responsibilities’, it alleges, while Horrobin’s research ethics are described as ‘considerably dubious’. It is even suggested that researchers testing his company’s drugs had been offered sales royalties to influence the outcome of their work, a ‘highly unusual’ action, the obituary adds.


These views – unprecedented for a journal regarded as the mouthpiece of the medical establishment – have provoked a storm of outrage. The BMJ has been inundated with angry letters. Council members of the British Medical Association, the publisher of the BMJ, have logged complaints, while Horrobin’s family have asked the Press Complaints Commission to condemn the obituary… Guardian/Observer

A taste of death:

Eating Apes by Dale Peterson, reviewed:

This book has a terrible title, conjuring up images of roast loin of chimp or gorilla stew. It is absolutely appropriate. Now that I am familiar with Dale Peterson’s style, I am convinced that he chose the title intentionally, for he intended to upset the reader.


We are uneasy about the idea of eating the apes because they behave more like us than any other mammals: they walk upright on their hind legs; they use tools; they laugh and show grief; and they are among the few mammals that understand that it is themselves that they see in a mirror. We share 98.74 per cent of our DNA with chimpanzees, making them our closest living relatives, and this ought to transcend the idea of our using them for food.


But this “we” cannot be applied to the indigenous peoples of Central Africa. From time immemorial, they have hunted and eaten the animals that share their habitat. So if they have always eaten gorilla and chimpanzee meat, why should it be a problem now? Because the great apes have now been so assaulted by hunting and disease that they are careering towards extinction. Times of London

Third Chimp to First Chimp: ‘Welcome Home’?

Chimps are human, gene study implies: “With just 0.6% difference in the most critical DNA sites, the new work suggests chimps should be in the same taxonomic group as humans.

(…)

It is not the first time such a suggestion has been made – in 1991 physiologist and ecologist Jared Diamond called humans ‘the third chimpanzee’. But subsequent genetic comparisons have yielded varying results, depending on how the genotypes are compared.” New Scientist

The Shape of Hunger


//graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2003/05/22/opinion/KRIS.583.jpg' cannot be displayed]

“Children like Aberash will be saved only if the West mounts a major effort to help them. The U.S. has responded relatively well to the calls for assistance from Ethiopia, but I’m afraid that much more will be needed. For individuals who want to contribute, some options are listed below.” — Nicholas Kristof, NY Times

Einstein Archives Online:

“… provides the first online access to Albert Einstein’s scientific and non-scientific manuscripts held by the Albert Einstein Archives at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and to an extensive Archival Database, constituting the material record of one of the most influential intellects in the modern era… The site allows viewing and browsing of approx. 3,000 high-quality digitized images of Einstein’s writings, available for viewing in two sizes: a standard resolution image, as well as a high-resolution image for closer inspection.

Obsessed with knowing how you’re doing?

Call it a two-minute drill for the mind. A Palm OS application will tell users whether or not they’re sober enough to drive, attentive enough to impress a cynical corporate recruiter or responsive enough to prevail in a bloody bout of WWF Smackdown.

In fact, researchers at the National Space Biomedical Research Institute claim their new MiniCog PDA application will help people determine if they “need to eat, sleep, exercise or better focus (their) thoughts.” ‘ Wired News

‘The Truth Will Emerge’.

Is Sen. Robert Byrd the last Democrat? Here’s an excerpt from his May 21 Senate floor remarks; read the entire talk.

The American people unfortunately are used to political shading, spin and the usual chicanery they hear from public officials. They patiently tolerate it up to a point. But there is a line. It may seem to be drawn in invisible ink for a time, but eventually it will appear in dark colors, tinged with anger. When it comes to shedding American blood–when it comes to wreaking havoc on civilians, on innocent men, women and children, callous dissembling is not acceptable. Nothing is worth that kind of lie–not oil, not revenge, not re-election, not somebody’s grand pipe dream of a democratic domino theory. And mark my words, the calculated intimidation that we see so often of late by the “powers that be” will only keep the loyal opposition quiet for just so long. Because eventually, like it always does, the truth will emerge. And when it does, this house of cards, built of deceit, will fall.

The Shape of Hunger


//graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2003/05/22/opinion/KRIS.583.jpg' cannot be displayed]

“Children like Aberash will be saved only if the West mounts a major effort to help them. The U.S. has responded relatively well to the calls for assistance from Ethiopia, but I’m afraid that much more will be needed. For individuals who want to contribute, some options are listed below.” — Nicholas Kristof, NY Times

The Interpretive Industry Gears Up:

Philosophers Draw on the Film Matrix: “Hundreds of millions of dollars ago, in a galaxy far, far away, a hacker named Neo reached into his bookcase and pulled out a leatherbound volume with the title Simulacra and Simulation — a collection of essays by the French postmodernist philosopher Jean Baudrillard. But when Neo opened it to the chapter “On Nihilism,” it turned out to be just a simulacrum of a book, hollowed out to hold computer disks…


Mr. Baudrillard was only the beginning. When asked how many hidden messages there were in The Matrix, the Wachowski Brothers once teased, ‘More than you’ll ever know.’…” NY Times

Buddhists really do know secret of happiness:

“Buddhists who claim their religion holds the secret of happiness may have been proved right by science: brain scans of the devout have found exceptional activity in the lobes that promote serenity and joy.


American research has shown that the brain’s “happiness centre” is constantly alive with electrical signals in experienced Buddhists, offering an explanation for their calm and contented demeanour.


Neuroscientists think the preliminary findings could provide the first proof that religious training can change the way the brain responds to certain environmental triggers.” Times of London

Bush Proposes Universal Time Zone

At the United Nations today President George W. Bush announced a proposal to unify all the world’s time zones into a single Universal Time Zone (UTZ), formerly known as the Eastern Time Zone.

“It’s unfair to the United States that other countries have the advantage of being in tomorrow while the US is stuck in today,” said Bush. “If it’s 9 PM in Washington D.C., it’s already tomorrow in London or Paris. That patently unfair.”

Bush continued, “Right now, Americans are losing jobs to other countries whose workforce can give overnight service during their normal daylight hours. We’ll level the playing field and keep more jobs in the US with the UTZ.” BBspot [via walker]

Report: Blair ‘couldn’t stop laughing’ at Times correction.

In one of his few interviews since resigning from the Times on May 1, Blair told the Observer that he “fooled some of the most brilliant people in journalism” with his reporting.

(…)According to excerpts from the Observer, Blair said his deceptions stemmed from personal problems.


“I was either going to kill myself or I was going to kill the journalist persona,” he said. “So Jayson Blair the human being could live, Jayson Blair the journalist had to die.” CNN

Gnostic take on The Matrix Reloaded:

The Corporate Mofo Guide:

Going into The Matrix: Reloaded, I wasn’t worried if the fight scenes or special effects would measure up to the first film—it was the metaphysics that bothered me. The first Matrix was such a neat allegory of Gnostic philosophy, I was more concerned with how the Brothers Wachowski could successfully extend the metaphor into three films than whether they could pull off even more virtuoso examples of cinematic ass-stomping. What was mindblowing about the first movie, after all, wasn’t the fight choreography or bullet time, but its brave assertion that the banal, day-to-day reality we live in isn’t the real world. In that sense, all the wire-fu was just the candy coating on the red pill the filmmakers were offering to every high school student and cubicle slave in the world. (Though, since I study martial arts myself, I found the idea of kung fu as being metaphorical for something happening in hyper-reality, a la Thibault’s mysterious circle, to be pretty darn appealing.)


Thankfully, Reloaded more than allayed my fears, even if it seems that half the reviewers either didn’t understand what the Wachowskis were getting at, or else were only paying attention during the highway chase. Watching the movie, I was personally less impressed by the fists of digital fury than by the Brothers’ evident familiarity with the Dead Sea Scrolls and the theology of Origen of Alexandria. Seen in the light of the books they’re referencing, the movie’s plot is brilliant; of course, to the non-initiate, the characters’ actions and dialogue seems arbitrary and incomprehensible, and the exposition is just filler between car crashes. It would seem, therefore, that a bit of exegesis of The Matrix: Reloaded is warranted. But be warned: If you haven’t seen the movie yet, don’t read on. There are some major spoilers. <span class=”attrib”Corporate Mofo

Organised paranoia of West blows threat posed by al-Qaeda out of all proportion:

“America is now afraid of its own shadow. That was the mocking verdict passed by Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia’s Prime Minister, last week, angry at the haste with which the US issued a terrorism warning against travel to his country. Not exactly the image of strength and conviction that the White House had hoped to project after victory in Iraq, is it?


The West’s fearful response to each new threat or attack is acting as an open invitation to every little terrorist cell. The message is, “We are scared, so why not scare us some more?” All it takes is a few zealots with home-made bombs in Africa or Asia to have the Western world pressing the panic button.


Since the bloody bombings in Casablanca, there has been much talk of a new global crisis. Yet in truth the world cannot be changed by the blowing-up of a Spanish social club and a Jewish community centre in Morocco, any more than by last week’s attacks on petrol stations in Pakistan. Only our overblown reactions to these local incidents can create a crisis. ” — Mick Hume writing in the Times of London

Bruce Sterling loves Donald Rumsfeld:

In this Wired piece, he calls him “my favorite Bush administration figure”:

Rummy thinks outside the box. He talks in aphorisms, adages, and apothegms, rather like a magazine columnist. So I find it hard not to like him.

Essentially, he thinks the main problem with the administration is that they don’t follow Rumsfeld’s maxims closely enough.

US rivals turn on each other as weapons search draws a blank:

“(T)op officials are worried by repeated failures to find the proof – and US intelligence agencies are engaged in a struggle to avoid the blame. Guardian-Observer/UK

And:The Bush administration has changed its tune on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the reason it went to war there. Instead of looking for vast stocks of banned materials, it is now pinning its hopes on finding documentary evidence. The change in rhetoric, apparently designed in part to dampen public expectations, has unfolded gradually in the past month as special U.S. military teams have found little to justify the administration’s claim that Iraq (news – web sites) was concealing vast stocks of chemical and biological agents and was actively working on a covert nuclear weapons program.” Yahoo! News

Terror’s myriad faces:

“Jason Burke, a world expert on international terrorism, says those leading the war against the bombers misunderstand the true nature of al-Qaeda… Al-Qaeda, conceived of as a tight-knit terrorist group with cadres and a capability everywhere, does not exist in that form. It barely existed before the war in Afghanistan in 2001 destroyed Osama bin Laden’s carefully constructed infrastructure there. It certainly does not exist now. Instead, we are facing a different kind of threat. Al-Qaeda can only be understood as an ideology, an agenda and a way of seeing the world that is shared by an increasing number of predominantly young, predominantly male Muslims. Eliminating bin Laden and a few hundred senior activists will do nothing to counter this al-Qaeda. Hundreds more will come forward to fill their ranks. Al-Qaeda, however understood, will continue to operate. The threat will remain and it will grow.” Guardian-Observer/UK [thanks, adam]

Getting Science Into Literature:

On the Nature of Human Romantic Interaction reviewed: “How do you get science into literature? (Let’s skip the argument over whether this is a good thing to do.) There would seem to be two different ways. The first is to be a writer of literature with a grasp of science…The second way of getting science into literature is to be a scientist who happens to have a literary gift…

Karl Iagnemma is a research scientist at M.I.T. who specializes in robotics. He is also the author of short stories that have won a Paris Review Discovery Prize and a Pushcart Prize; another of his stories appeared in ”Best American Short Stories 2002.” Such honors amount to a series of presumably independent judgments by the literary establishment that Iagnemma is indeed a man with a literary gift — a verdict from which I would not dissent. But how well does he use this gift to illumine the scientific mind?” NY Times Book Review

Politicians being economical with the truth is the price of a healthy democracy:

Democrats should accept that some political deception is not only inevitable in a democracy but can be legitimate where it is conducted by elected politicians in the public interest where they have the tacit support of the electorate [emphasis added — FmH].

That is the key conclusion of Dr Glen Newey, a reader in politics at Strathclyde University, in his new research which is published today. The research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.

–snip–

“We try to apply different moral standards to the public and to politicians, yet the more we do so the more likely it is that politicians resort to deception,” he argues. “Demands for openness and accountability create a culture of suspicion which makes it even more likely that politicians will resort to evasion and misrepresentation.


“These demands often arise because of increasing alienation by voters from the political process that they democratically control. Yet the greater the demands for truthfulness, the less autonomy we give to our democratic institutions and the harder it is for democracy to function effectively.”


Dr Newey adds that the electorate will decide in the end whether deception is justified: “In a democracy, the popular will is sovereign. The only general way to determine that will is through democratic procedures which must decided whether the people have willed a given course of action. They can make clear their support or opposition in subsequent elections.”

Slain Gay Soldier’s Case Slows a General’s Rise

“The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee has delayed for the second time a vote on the promotion of an Army general who commanded a base where a gay soldier was beaten to death by a fellow soldier. The delay gives the committee more time to consider the general’s responsibility for what happened.


Maj. Gen. Robert T. Clark was commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., in 1999, when Pfc. Barry Winchell, 21, was bludgeoned to death in his barracks at the end of a beer-soaked evening.

–snip–

Private Winchell’s mother, Patricia Kutteles …said that he should not be promoted. “He doesn’t have the command authority or responsibility,” Mrs. Kutteles said. “The promotion would be another obstacle in the way of everything we have tried to do to honor our son.” NY Times

Science argues to keep bones:

The repatriation of human remains currently held in UK museums and universities to indigenous peoples around the world will do immense damage to science.That is the claim of leading researchers who fear many hundreds of specimens that hold vital clues to our evolutionary past could soon be dispersed to be reburied, burnt or even smashed up.


The scientists have been speaking ahead of a report due to be published this summer by a working group that will recommend changes to the legal status of human material held by UK institutions.” BBC

Children before cash:

Better childcare will do more for our wellbeing than greater affluence Guardian/UK. In taking sides on the ‘nature’ vs. ‘nurture’ controversy (which sophisticated behavioral and social scientists have long since come to think of as an outmoded false dichotomy), Oliver James comes close to identifying the evolutionary biology viewpoint with a reactionary social agenda. He also uses the observation that we have yet to determine a single gene responsible for a single mental illness as arefutation of genetic determinism, the reductiveness of which specious argument I hope is clear to readers…

Science argues to keep bones:

The repatriation of human remains currently held in UK museums and universities to indigenous peoples around the world will do immense damage to science.That is the claim of leading researchers who fear many hundreds of specimens that hold vital clues to our evolutionary past could soon be dispersed to be reburied, burnt or even smashed up.


The scientists have been speaking ahead of a report due to be published this summer by a working group that will recommend changes to the legal status of human material held by UK institutions.” BBC

Fugitive Texas Democrats Return to House:

Most anti-Republicans are celebrating their boldness in blocking a quorum and defeating the Republican-insinuated redistricting plan NY Times. My question is why they had to resort to the antics. If they had the courage of their convictions, why not stand against the issue as an unmoveable voting bloc in the legislature instead of hiding out? This does make a mockery of representative government, doesn’t it? Oops; I almost forgot — the redistricting plan was already going to make a mockery of representative government if Tom DeLay had had his way…

Blowback Dept.:

40 Killed As Terror Blasts Shake Morocco: “Suicide attackers set off a string of explosions in the heart of Casablanca, killing at least 40 people at a Jewish community center, the Belgian consulate, a Spanish social club and a major hotel.” Yahoo! News I guess if the Bush regime is entitled to call every act of sectarian violence the work of al Qaeda and use it to justify the WoT®, I’m entitled to see each of them as recompense for America’s deadly unilateral arrogance. And what exactly are the ‘hallmarks of al Qaeda?”

No one immediately blamed al-Qaida for the Morocco attacks, but they had many of the group’s hallmarks: multiple, simultaneous strikes; suicide assailants; and lightly defended targets.


“They were terrorists, suicide bombers,” Interior Minister Mustapha Sahel told reporters. “These are the well-known signatures of international terrorists.”

Profound.

Strong Must Rule the Weak, said Neo-Cons’ Muse.

“Is U.S. foreign policy being run by followers of an obscure German Jewish political philosopher whose views were elitist, amoral and hostile to democratic government?

Suddenly, political Washington is abuzz about Leo Strauss, who arrived in the United States in 1938 and taught at several major universities before his death in 1973.


Thanks to the ”Week in Review” section of last Sunday’s New York Times and another investigative article in this week’s New Yorker magazine [to which I previously linked — FmH], the cognoscenti have suddenly been made aware that key neo-conservative strategists behind the Bush administration’s aggressive foreign and military policy consider themselves to be followers of Strauss, although the philosopher – an expert on Plato and Aristotle – rarely addressed current events in his writings.”

As for what a Straussian world order might look like, … the philosopher often talked about Jonathan Swift’s story of Gulliver and the Lilliputians. ”When Lilliput was on fire, Gulliver urinated over the city, including the palace. In so doing, he saved all of Lilliput from catastrophe, but the Lilliputians were outraged and appalled by such a show of disrespect.”


For Strauss, the act demonstrates both the superiority and the isolation of the leader within a society and, presumably, the leading country vis-a-vis the rest of the world.


…(I)t is ironic, but not inconsistent with Strauss’ ideas about the necessity for elites to deceive their citizens, that the Bush administration defends its anti-terrorist campaign by resorting to idealistic rhetoric. ”They really have no use for liberalism and democracy, but they’re conquering the world in the name of liberalism and democracy” …

— Jim Lobe, CommonDreams [thanks, walker]

Okay, so there are uncanny similarities between this rendition of Strauss’ principles and the pattern of Bush regime behavior, and it appears that a number of Strauss disciples are in pivotal positions to influence the decisions of our naive and credulous President. Many of us have long been convinced of, and outraged by, the centrality of deception in the dysadministration’s P.R. So, if this is Strauss’ influence, how does knowing about it help? It is not as if the battle for the hearts and minds of the American public is going to be won in university political philosophy departments. More bluntly, are most of the people who elect our next President going to grasp, or care, that an insidious pro-authoritarian philosophy is the altar at which the Bush zealots worship? What is to be done? Damned if I know. It does occur to me to regret that the relatively small segment of the population who did not believe there would be much difference between Bush and Gore, and thus voted for Nader (and who, by and large, might be sophisticated and interested enough to pay attention to the influence of an obscure and insidious political philosopher, and who are under no illusions about the power of a small covert inner core to so profoundly influence the direction of a nation’s policy) weren’t familiar with Strauss three years ago.

Also: Ardent opponent of tyranny, or an apologist for the abuse of power?

“Odd as this might sound, we live in a world increasingly shaped by Leo Strauss, a controversial philosopher who died in 1973. Although generally unknown to the wider population, Strauss has been one of the two or three most important intellectual influences on the conservative worldview now ascendant in George W. Bush’s Washington. Eager to get the lowdown on White House thinking, editors at the New York Times and Le Monde have had journalists pore over Strauss’s work and trace his disciples’ affiliations. The New Yorker has even found a contingent of Straussians doing intelligence work for the Pentagon.” — Jeet Heer, Boston Globe

DNA evidence shows race doesn’t exist –

“The recently completed Human Genome Sequencing Project has confirmed what many scientists knew all along — that humans don’t fit the biological criteria that defines race.

The revelation strikes at the heart of some of the most deeply entrenched social, cultural and political divisions among Americans. But some experts say our conception of race is not likely to be swayed by the DNA evidence.” twincities.com

Related: Researchers: Americans know no more about genetics than in 1990 EurekAlert!

Neutrino beam could neutralise nuclear bombs –

“A super-powered neutrino generator could in theory be used to instantly destroy nuclear weapons anywhere on the planet, according to a team of Japanese scientists.

If it was ever built, a state could use the device to obliterate the nuclear arsenal of its enemy by firing a beam of neutrinos straight through the Earth. But the generator would need to be more than a hundred times more powerful than any existing particle accelerator and over 1000 kilometres wide.” New Scientist