“Of all our recommendations, strengthening congressional oversight may be among the most difficult and important,” the commissioners stressed in their final report. They urged that Congress give its intelligence committees control over both authorizations and appropriations — so that the committees would finally have the muscle to provide real oversight.’ — David Ignatius (Washington Post op-ed)
Author Archives: FmH
The Verdict Is In
“Sanctions worked. Weapons inspectors worked. That is the bottom line of the long-awaited report on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.” (New York Times editorial)
Iraq: 12 killed in possible wedding party attack
This is not the first time that US devastation of what military command describes as a suspected ‘safe house’ for foreign fighters is countered by claims by opponents of our occupation of Iraq that what was really attacked was a wedding party. Not that I trust the US government’s version of reality too often, but it does seem that the critics use the wedding party excuse — even at midweek, at that — a little too consistently.
Why Did James Baker Turn Bush Into Nixon?
What If Bush Didn’t Lie?
Doug Giebel thinks Bush’s world is falling apart. Readers of FmH know that I have long speculated that Bush is an incurious and malleable patsy of his handlers in the misadministration; a rigid credulous ne’er-do-well of simpleminded faith who has not been lying so much as lied to by his advisers puppetmasters. Giebel agrees, and thinks that what we were seeing in the first debate was Dubya’s dawning realization, despite being the “most insulated leader in our history”, of the contradictions. It is crediting Bush with alot, I know, to think that he is beginning to grasp this. Giebel actually seems to pity the man, which is a neat solution to the pain it causes some of us to hold him in such utter contempt. (Counterpunch)
Related: Here, an intriguing notion of how they might feed the puppet Bush his lines when he is onstage:
Is Dad keeping it real?
Cheney slip sends Net surfers to anti-Bush site
But Cheney cited FactCheck.com, a for-profit advertising site based in the Cayman Islands.
The company decided to redirect traffic to the Soros site after it became inundated with hits — about 100 a second after the debate, John Berryhill, a Philadelphia lawyer for FactCheck.com, said Wednesday.
‘This was to relieve stress on the service and to express a political point of view,’ said Berryhill, who spoke with the site’s administrators shortly after the debate ended.” (CNN)
"the fitful tracing of a portal"
A very happy fourth blogiversary to an all-time favorite and daily read, wood s lot… if you can call it a blog.
One Big Fat Egregious Liar
That’s not all. Although Edwards had pretty much been running for president, and indeed missing many important votes, for the past two years, Cheney rarely meets Democratic senators in his weekly trips to the Hill. Although he represented himself as coming to the Senate in his presiding role, he’s really there for a weekly lunch witht he Republican senatorial delegation.
Some more Bush League lies, via boing boing:
Ken Mehlman, Mr. Bush’s campaign manager, delivered the request in an e-mail message to supporters early Tuesday morning. ” (New York Times )
Why Don’t Americans Care?
Most Americans, in other words, have no idea what the hell a Halliburton is. Or a Karl Rove. Or a Donny ‘Shriveled Soul’ Rumsfeld. Or a Lockheed Martin. Or a Carlysle Group. Or have any idea that Saddam had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Or that WMDs were never found. Or that President Bush has taken more vacation time than any president in U.S. history. Or that Jesus thinks Dubya is ‘sort of a dink.’ Or where Iraq is on a map.” — Mark Morford, (San Francisco Chronicle)
Killer rock
“…we look rock ‘n’ roll death in the eye and examine some of the most ghoulish trends in rock history…”, including the ‘deadest bands in rock’ and the ‘deadliest jobs’ in the field. (New York Daily News)
Sprawl May Harm Health, Study Finds
Unintended Consequences Dept:
One in three women and one in four men in the UK is estimated to take dietary supplements for health reasons. But a review of 14 trials of vitamin pills taken by 170,000 people found they increased the death rate by 6 per cent. While they offered no explanation as to what caused the deaths, they discovered that the supplements offered no protection against cancers of the gut.” (Independent.UK)
Could it be that people who take vitamins, as compared to those who don’t, are more anxious about their health, and that this is correlated with the excess mortality, either because they have something about which to be anxious, or because the anxiety itself has adverse health consequences?
The Submerging World
Bill McKibben says that low-lying islands are being drowned. They are the ‘canaries in the coalmine’ of global warming, since
Admittedly, no one intends this destruction — on the other hand, nobody is doing much of anything to stop it, either. Eventually, of course, our inaction will do enormous damage even to our midlatitude fortress continent. Those pictures of crumbling foundations, swelling lagoons — that’s our future too, along with parched deserts, dying forests, discombobulated agriculture. But by the time that future kicks in, later in the century, we will be hard-pressed to say we don’t deserve it. Right now, global warming is coming first for the Tuvaluans — a little like last century’s scourge came first for the Jews. It took us too long, but eventually we roused ourselves to help meet that challenge with sacrifice and with fortitude. I wonder what we’ll do about this one.” (Orion )
One World Health
New Scientist interviews Vicki Hale, founder of the first nonprofit pharmaceutical company, which is obtaining the rights to ‘orphan drugs’ for rare but devastating diseases traditional drug companies have little incentive to address.
Long Strange Trip
“It has been a long trip for psychedelic drugs, but they’re creeping toward prescription status in the US, thanks to a group of persistent scientists who say they can help people with mental disorders and chronic pain.” (Wired)
Bad Thoughts
New Scientist interviews Jamie Whyte, author of Crimes Against Logic.
This is one of my favourite errors. An interesting change has happened, at least in the west. It used to be that people would argue for a particular religious dogma or a clear religious doctrine. That is no longer what happens. The world is increasingly dividing into those who have “faith” and those who don’t. It doesn’t really matter what the faith is. That is why you now get “faith groups” coming together from all kinds of different religions. The weirdest manifestation of this new tendency is when people say: “I’m not a Christian but I believe in something.” Then I say: “Of course, I believe in many things, like there is a chair there and a table. What are you talking about?” And they reply: “Well, you know, something more.” But what “more”? What they mean is something more than we have any good reason to believe in.
That really seems to get to you!
What amazes me is that they like to set themselves up as having a slightly finer sensibility than you or me but in fact they are completely intellectually irresponsible. They used to come up with very bad arguments for their faiths but at least they felt that there was something they should provide. Now mere wilfulness has triumphed. This is what I describe as the egocentric approach to truth. You are no longer interested in reality because to do that you have to be pretty rigorous, you have to have evidence or do some experimentation. Rather, beliefs are part of your wardrobe. You’ve got a style and how dare anybody tell you that your style isn’t right. Ideology is seen as simply a matter of taste and as it’s not right to tell people that they’ve got bad taste, so it’s not right to tell them that their opinions are false. I’m afraid that the cast of mind of most people is the opposite of scientific. “
Italians fall out of love with ‘two Simonas’
“Italy’s adoration of the ‘two Simonas’, the women aid workers abducted in Iraq, began to sour yesterday, as the extent of their sympathy for the Iraqi fight against the allied occupation became clear.” (Telegraph.UK)
On a Matter of Life or Death, a Patient Is Overruled
…’If you get through this,’ I whispered to Mr. Smith, ‘I hope you can forgive me.’
I have never been able to balance satisfactorily in my own mind the twin pillars of modern medical ethics: patient autonomy and the physician’s obligation to do the best for his patient. As a doctor, when do you let your patient make a bad decision? When, if ever, do you draw the line? What if a decision could cost your patient’s life? How hard do you push him to change his mind? At the same time, it is his life. Who are you to tell him how to live it?” (New York Times)
In this troubling essay, the physician seems to justify an invasive outright violation of a competent patient’s clearly expressed directives because the patient is grateful several weeks later. The physician asserts that no one really wants to die, and agrees enthusiastically with a colleague, in a travesty of a competency assessment, that if the patient had expressed a wish not to have heroic measures, his thinking wasn’t straight. This style of medicine is pitiful in its singleminded, vain and ultimately of course pointless quest to cheat death at all costs. The pride physicians like this take in their seeming omnipotence and omniscience make me ashamed of my profession. I am surprised that the author was so un-self-conscious as to have no embarrassment at having portrayed himself in this light. There are any number of vignettes most of us can describe — or which you can see on ER every week — that describe the subtleties of medical decision-making in the face of ethical dilemmas… but this is not one.
Cracks in the Facade
“The former U.S. civilian administrator in Iraq says the United States ‘paid a big price’ for not having enough troops on the ground after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime.” (CNN)
“Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld appeared Monday to back off earlier statements suggesting Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had links to al Qaeda.
He also conceded that U.S. intelligence was “wrong” in its conclusions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.” (CNN) What is going on here? Is it possible that, in the aftermath of the debate, as Bush’s inability to admit his mistakes seems as if it will lose the election for him, he is sending out his minions to see how a ‘flip flop’ would play?
Oh, and: Poland (as in “Don’t forget Poland”) is pulling out of the coalition of the misbegotten.
Kerry, Newest Neocon
Safire just doesn’t get it: “As the Democratic Whoopee Brigade hailed Senator Kerry’s edge in debating technique, nobody noticed his foreign policy sea change. On both military tactics and grand strategy, the newest neoconservative announced doctrines more hawkish than President Bush.” (New York Times op-ed)
Two Peoples, One State
Should Palestinians give up on an independent state?:
‘Fairness and Balance’ Dept.
Fox News quickly retracted the article, saying in an editor’s note on its Web site that the article ‘was written in jest and should not have been posted or broadcast.” It said, ‘We regret the error, which occurred because of fatigue and bad judgment, not malice…” (New York Times )
The well-respected senior Fox correspondent who wrote the story has been ‘reprimanded’ but continues to report from the campaign trail. Fox has declined to say what action, if any, was taken against those who reviewed the article for posting. The New York Times places this incident in the context of “a time when journalistic errors and lapses both big and small have called into question the credibility of a number of major news organizations”, citing the CBS News embarrassment about the Bush National Guard documents. No mention is made of the Times’ own besmirched record in covering the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq and its role in the totally uncritical media coverage of candidate Bush in the 2000 campaign.
Widower promotes John Kerry for president in wife’s obituary
In a paid obituary published in Madison’s two daily newspapers, Roger Buffett celebrated his wife’s years as a mother, homemaker, grandmother and English teacher. But, he said, she was ‘outraged’ by President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq and then expecting ‘her grandchildren to pay the bills.’ Other Bush administration policies angered her as well.”
Global : Ideas : Bank
These ideas we term social inventions: non-technological, non-product, non-gadget ideas for social change. These are a mix of existing projects, fledgling initiatives and new bright ideas.
In this way, the Global Ideas Bank is part-suggestions box, part-ideas network and part-democratic think-tank, giving the “ordinary” person a chance to have their creativity recognised, rewarded and even put into practice. “
Scientists Hit Campaign Trail for Kerry
Scientists Hit Campaign Trail for Kerry
Fear of Flying
However, Janet Linke of Jacksonville, Florida, says that it all came down to an inability to perform. Linke is the widow of Jan Peter Linke, who was brought into Bush’s National Guard unit to replace him when Bush left the unit and the state for Alabama in May 1972.” (The Nation)
Faith vs. reason
Of everything I have read analyzing the first debate, Sidney Blumenthal best captures the depths of what was revealed about Bush’s fear, inadequacy, unpreparedness and inflexibility when he has to think on his feet. He concludes:
Finally, near the end, Kerry praised Bush for his public service, and his wife, and his daughters. “I’m trying to put a leash on them,” Bush said. That was hard work, too. “Well, I don’t know,” replied Kerry, who also has daughters. “I’ve learned not to do that, Mr. President.” Even in the banter about parental control, Kerry gained the upper hand.
But Bush lost more than control in the first debate. He lost the plot. ” (Salon )
Even forgeting about content, ‘Body language expert’ says Kerry “more presidential”:
Mr Bush sounded arrogant and unable to control his emotions, especially in the latter part of the debate, she contends.
However, Ms Wood says, Mr Bush at times radiated warmth in a way that Mr Kerry could not emulate.” (BBC )
But Derrick Jackson thinks Kerry made one crucial mistake in the debate… and that it might end up costing him the election. (Boston Globe op-ed) And Conason cautionsthat, after the euphoria, “…Kerry and his advisors had better not get too cocky over their victory in the first debate.” (Salon) But, for the moment, let’s be cocky… and full of schadenfreude. Here, from the DNC, is a greatest-hits compilation of Bush’s smirks from the debate.
On Television: Candidates Most Telling When They Aren’t Talking
When the networks (flouting the debate rules) cut to Mr. Bush while Senator John Kerry was speaking, the president had the hunched shoulders and the peevish, defensive look of an incumbent under heavy attack.
And it was body language as much as rhetoric and one-liners that distinguished the two candidates in last night’s debate. The networks were right to disregard the campaigns’ ban on cutaways and reaction shots. Instead, all the networks, including Fox News, lavished viewers with split screens and shots of the candidates from almost every angle, including shots from behind the president’s tensely knotted back.” (New York Times)
Resumé
This has done the rounds but deserves to be posted again since it apparently election season:
Past Work Experience:
I ran for U.S. Congress and lost.
I produced a Hollywood slasher B movie.
I bought an oil company, but couldn’t find any oil in Texas; the company went bankrupt shortly after I sold all my stock.
I bought the Texas Rangers baseball team in a sweetheart deal that took land using taxpayer money.
With my father’s help and name, I was elected Governor of Texas.Accomplishments as Governor:
I changed pollution laws in favor of the power and oil companies and made Texas the most polluted state in the Union.
I replaced Los Angeles with Houston as the most smog-ridden city in America.
I cut taxes and bankrupted Texas government to the tune of billions in borrowed money.
I set the record for the most executions by any Governor in American history.
I became U.S. President after losing the popular vote by over 500,000 votes with the help of major Enron money and my father’s appointments to the Supreme Court.Accomplishments as President:
I spent the U.S. surplus and effectively bankrupted the U.S. Treasury.
I entered my office with the strongest economy in U.S. history and have turned every single economic category downward — all in less than two years.
I shattered the record for the largest annual deficit in U.S. history.
I garnered the most sympathy for the U.S. after the World Trade Center attacks and less than a year later made the U.S. the most resented country in the world, possibly the largest failure of diplomacy in World history.
I am the first president in U.S. history to enter office with a criminal record.
I set the the all-time record for most days on vacation in any one year period,
I am supporting development of a “Tactical Bunker Buster” nuke, a WMD.
I am getting our troops killed, under the lie of Sadam’s procurement of Yellow Cake Nuke WMD components, then blaming the lie on our British friends.
I set the record for most campaign fund-raising trips by a U.S. president.
In my first year in office over 2-million Americans lost their jobs and that trend continues every month.
I set the all-time record for most foreclosures in a 12-month period.
I appointed more convicted criminals to administration than any president in U.S. history.
I set the record for least amount of press conferences than any president since the advent of television.
I signed more laws and executive orders effectively amending or ignoring the Constitution than any president in history.
I presided over the biggest energy crisis in U.S. history and refused to intervene when corruption involving the oil industry was revealed.
I presided over the highest gasoline prices in U.S. history and refused to use national reserves as past presidents have done.
I have cut health care benefits for war veterans and support a cut in duty benefits for active duty troops and their families — in war time.
I have set the all-time record for most people worldwide to simultaneously protest me in public venues (15 million people) shattering the record for protest against any person in the history of mankind.
I’ve dissolved more international treaties than any president in U.S. history.
I’ve made my presidency the most secretive and unaccountable of any in U.S. history.
I’m proud that the members of my cabinet are the richest of any administration in U.S. history.
My “poorest millionaire,” Condoleeza Rice, has a Chevron oil tanker named after her.
I am the first president in U.S. history to have almost all 50 states of the Union simultaneously suffer massive financial crisis.
I presided over the biggest corporate stock market fraud of any market in any country in history.
I am the first president in U.S. history to order a pre-emptive attack and the military occupation of a sovereign nation, and I did so against the will of the United Nations and the world community.
I created the largest government department bureaucracy in the history of the United States.
I set the all-time record for biggest annual budget spending increases, more than any president in history.
I am the first president in U.S. history to have the United Nations remove the U.S. from the Human Rights Commission.
I am the first president in U.S. history to have the United Nations remove the U.S. from the Elections Monitoring Board.
I removed more checks and balances, and have the least amount of congressional oversight than any presidential administration in U.S. history.
I rendered the entire United Nations viewpoints irrelevant.
I withdrew the U.S. from the World Court of Law.
I refused to allow inspectors access to U.S. “prisoners of war” (detainees) and thereby have refused to abide by the Geneva Convention.
I am the first president in history to refuse United Nations election inspectors (during the 2002 U.S. election).
I am the all-time U.S. and world record-holder for receiving the most corporate campaign donations.
My largest lifetime campaign contributor, and one of my best friends, (Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron Corporation) presided over the largest corporate bankruptcy fraud in U.S. history. My political party used the Enron private jets and corporate attorneys to assure my success with the U.S. Supreme Court during my election decision.
I am first president in history to have a majority of Europeans (71%) view my presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and security.
I am the first U.S. president in history to have the people of South Korea more threatened by the U.S. than by their immediate neighbor, North Korea.
I changed the U.S. policy to allow convicted criminals to be awarded government contracts.
I set an all-time record for the number of administration appointees who violated U.S. law by not selling their huge personal investments in corporations bidding for U.S. contracts.
I failed to fulfill my pledge to capture Osama Bin Laden, dead or alive.
I failed to capture the anthrax killer who tried to murder the leaders of our country at the U.S. Capitol Building. Even after 18 months I have no leads and no credible suspects.
In the past 18 months following the World Trade Center attack I have successfully prevented any public investigation into the biggest security failure in the history of the United States.
I removed more freedoms and civil liberties for Americans than any president in U.S. history.
In a little over two years, I created the most divided country in decades, possibly the most divided since the Civil War.Records and References:
I have at least one conviction for drunk driving in Maine. My Texas driving record has been erased and is not available.
I was AWOL from the National Guard.
I refuse to take a drug test or even answer any questions about drug use.
All records of my tenure as Governor of Texas are now in my father’s library, sealed, and unavailable for public view.
All records of SEC investigations into insider trading or bankrupt companies are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
All records or minutes from meetings that I, or my Vice-President, attended regarding public energy policy are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public review.Please consider my experience when voting in 2004.
R.I.P. Dr. John E. Mack
![John Mack (1929-2004) [Image 'mack.jpg' cannot be displayed]](mack.jpg)
Psychiatrist Dies at 74. Dr. Mack was killed when struck by a car apparently driven by a drunk driver, while in London to speak at a conference. He was a founder of the psychiatry department at the Cambridge Hospital where I trained and was one of my mentors, with whom I collaborated on work on the psychological consequences of the nuclear threat. Mack attracted heaps of scorn (and an unsuccessful move to censure him at the Harvard Medical School, which ended up reaffirming him) for his final decades’ focus on people claiming to have been victims of alien abduction. His sophisticated take on the issue was widely misjudged and ridiculed as credulity, since he was often in the company of credulous abduction adherents. But the New York Times obituary has a more accurate bead on the context and the significance of this work:
“He was drawn to psychoanalytic analysis of the misunderstood or vulnerable, including children contemplating suicide, teenagers troubled by the threat of nuclear war and finally, people plagued by what they believed to be recurrent alien encounters.
In the 1990’s, Dr. Mack studied dozens of people who said they had had such contact with aliens, culminating in his book “Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens” in 1994. In it, he focused less on whether aliens were real than on the spiritual effects of perceived encounters, arguing that “the abduction phenomenon has important philosophical, spiritual and social implications” for everyone. “
The First Debate
…Bush sounded less convincing when he had to make his case in the face of Mr. Kerry’s withering criticism, particularly his repeated insistence that the invasion had diverted attention from the true center of the war on terror in Afghanistan.
Mr. Kerry found the most effective line of argument when he told the audience that “Iraq was not even close to the center of the war on terror” and that the president had “rushed the war in Iraq without a plan to win the peace.” It is the strongest and most sensible critique of the administration’s actions. Of course, it left Mr. Kerry open to rejoinders by Mr. Bush that Mr. Kerry had sounded far more warlike about Iraq in his pre-campaign persona. That’s a fair comment, and one the senator simply has to live with in this campaign. “As the politics changed, his position changed,” Mr. Bush said.
But when Mr. Bush jabbed at the senator with a reminder about his infamous comment on voting for a war appropriation before he voted against it, Mr. Kerry had finally found an effective answer. While saying he had made a mistake in the way he had expressed himself, the senator added: “But the president made a mistake in invading Iraq. Which is worse?” ‘ (New York Times editorial)
Kerry is clearly listening to the advice that he neither pussyfoot in rebutting Bush nor be diverted from the central issues. Looking forward to the next debate a week from tonight, whose ‘town hall’ format might be even more amenable to sowing seeds of concern about Bush’s smarmy simpleminded wrongheadedness.
Also: Kerry vs. the Format, Bush vs. his Temper:
Changing Places
“Is it possible, after all these years, that white folk have come to speak ‘black’ far better than blacks speak ‘white’?” Henry Louis Gates, (New York Times op-ed) Decreasing mastery of standard English among African Americans since the ’60’s, Gates argues, is a result of segregation (due to which “poor blacks tend to live with poor blacks”) and, counterintuitively, of desegregation (“which ended up separating the black poor and the black middle class”).
How Tony Blair Handled It
Top 10 Secrets They Don’t Want You to Know About the Debates
‘A debate is a head-to-head, spontaneous, structured argument over the merits of an issue,’ Rice says. ‘Under the ridiculous 32-page contract that reads like the rules for the Miss America Pageant, there will be no candidate-to-candidate questions, no rebuttal to your opponent’s points, no cross questions or cross answers, no rebuttals, no follow-up questions — that’s not a debate, that’s a news conference.'”
Connie Rice is a commentator on NPR’s Tavis Smiley Show.
How to Debate George Bush
Comparing these grandiose promises to his failed record, it’s enough to make anyone want to, well, sigh.” (New York Times )
The essay, which argues some fairly vehement points, surprisingly fizzles out in its concluding remark. And in arguing that Kerry should not be intimidated by Bush’s rhetorical style or debating track record but should be about the ‘beef’, it ignores the fact that many voters are taken in by Bush’s beguiling sophistry and unable to think about what substance there might be behind it. With the TV audience’s post-MTV attention span, Kerry’s appeal to Bush’s abysmal record might well meet with blank incomprehension in most of the flickering blue-lit living rooms.
Why We Cannot Win
A noncommissioned officer with over 20 years’ experience in the military, now on the ground in Iraq, says: “Ideology and idealism will never trump history and reality.”
Counseling May Beat Sleeping Pills for Insomnia
The investigators say their study findings show that counseling, in the form of cognitive behavioral therapy, should replace drugs as the insomnia treatment of choice.
‘You don’t have to live with insomnia, and the most effective treatments are non-drug,’ said lead study author Dr. Gregg D. Jacobs, an insomnia specialist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
When applied to insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy aims to change people’s thoughts and behaviors regarding sleep. In short, it addresses the roots of a person’s sleep difficulties, Jacobs told Reuters Health.”
This comes as no surprise to those of us who consult to patients and their doctors about sleep disorders. Even when medication is prescribed, educating and counseling the insomniac on “sleep hygiene” measures, as they used to be called before CBT became such a buzzword, was de rigeur. The potential for a good night’s sleep is very sensitive to assumptions and expectations with which a person approaches bedtime, as well as certain controllable physiological parameters that ‘set the internal clock’. And most sleep medications are not only limited by the development of tolerance to their soporific effects (tolerance is the phenomenon whereby a given dosage becomes ineffective and the user needs more and more to achieve the same effect) but dependency-induced rebound insomnia, so that after some time on sleep medications, the insomniac not only does not sleep well if they skip their meds but they do not sleep well even if they continue to take them, and will often have even more difficulty when they go off the medication than if they had never taken it in the first place. Furthermore, medications that put someone to sleep, or keep them there, usually have effects more broadly on cerebral functions beyond affecting the sleep-wakefulness circuitry.
Buckyballs are toxic
Nanotechnology causes brain damage (Houston Chronicle)
Merck Obtains Rights to Drug That Tells the Body It’s Full
The drug is now in the earliest stages of clinical trials, meaning that, if found to be effective, it would probably take several years to become available to consumers.
The spray incorporates… a hormone made by the small intestine that is sent to the brain to signal satiety. There is some evidence that obese people make less of this hormone than leaner people, suggesting that their brains might be receiving only a weak signal to stop eating.” (New York Times)
I realize that the burgeoning science of obesity and weight reduction is a complicated and active field, and I do not presume to understand the intricacies of the regulatory mechanisms governing appetite and body weight, which become more complex the deeper we dig. However, if this is all that this hormone, and this drug, do, I am dubious about the role they will play in significant weight loss. Signalling satiety to the brain all you want is not going to stop most people from overeating, which is more influenced by cultural mores and psychological habits. When the average MacDonald’s customer super-sizes their order every time they patronize the place, is it because their body isn’t telling them it is full or because they are ignoring the signals that they are already receiving? People eat for comfort or pleasure far beyond the satiety point.
Any Undecided Voters Left in Florida? Above the Waterline?
Here is a connection that ought to be made. As newsgawkers throughout the country watch the only issue that has recently displaced campaign derring-do from the lead spot — Florida devastated by four successive violent hurricanes — I am surprised Kerry is not making more of an issue of the association between global warming and hurricanes.
Let us not forget what an utter disaster the Bush misadministration has been for protection of the environment. While issues like his torpedoing of the prospects for the Kyoto Accords are abstruse to the average voter, they understand roofs being ripped off of their neighbors’ homes.
We’re Being Scared to Death
Still Seeking a Fair Florida Vote
The disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems of 2000 now seems likely, even as many other nations are conducting elections that are internationally certified to be transparent, honest and fair.” — Jimmy Carter (Washington Post op-ed)
Warning: nicotine seriously improves health
More than 50 per cent of people suffering from clinical depression smoke, while the figure rises to 95 per cent for schizophrenics. But smoking among the general public has dropped to about 25 per cent. ‘The assumption is that people with psychiatric conditions are self-medicating,’ said McGehee. ‘They are smoking because the nicotine in particularly helpful in alleviating their condition.'” (Guardian.UK)
Warning: nicotine seriously improves health
More than 50 per cent of people suffering from clinical depression smoke, while the figure rises to 95 per cent for schizophrenics. But smoking among the general public has dropped to about 25 per cent. ‘The assumption is that people with psychiatric conditions are self-medicating,’ said McGehee. ‘They are smoking because the nicotine in particularly helpful in alleviating their condition.'” (Guardian.UK)
Titanic merger of galaxy clusters revealed
“One of the most powerful cosmic events ever witnessed is imaged in exquisite detail by an X-ray observatory in space.” (New Scientist)
iPod adds new dimension to existence (?)
Okay, I love my iPod too, but “a new dimension to existence“?? The writer feels connected to all the other earbud-wearers crossing the campus quad; they inhabit a new stratum of society participating in a smug technological superiority and enjoy their music collections in an unprecedented way that represents a major step in human cultural-technological evolution, to listen to this gushing essay. I have the opposite experience when I listen; that I am encased in a shell, oblivious to my social surroundings as well as a salient portion of the ambient environment, and this is not necessarily for the better. Maybe it is because I am not a student confining much of my perambulations to a college campus as the writer does, but I feel more and more that the contexts where I am willing to use it are more and more restricted, as time goes on. And, although it is good at screening out annoying environmental noise, an iPod cannot really be used for background music. I used to take it to the cafe I frequent to sit for a couple of hours with a pot of tea and a book, figuring I would enjoy my own playlist more than the neo-muzak the place plays. But the music from the iPod is so in-my-face that it is not possible to concentrate on a book. So I conclude that my iPod is more for active, deliberate listening, for example while out for a walk with the dog, taking a run or, most frequently these days, to have my entire music collection with me during a long road trip.
And as for adding a new dimension to my existence, probably not unless I add one of these things to my iPod…
The Naked Emperor
I should have realized that my friend Dennis Fox, an incisive thinker who has taught social psychology (a field which, he concludes, “examines fascinating, important subjects in an incredibly silly, mind-numbing way”), would have some illuminating things to say in response to my Stanley Milgram item below. He focuses on Milgram’s more famous ‘obedience experiment’, whose implications he feels have often been misinterpreted:
This has had important implications for Dennis as a social activist, who cites the concept of pluralistic ignorance (“defined at the time as a situation where the majority of people in a community believe or do something that goes against community norms, but because everyone keeps their own behavior a secret, community norms are upheld”) and the implication that a vocal minority proclaiming that the emperor has no clothes can spur the majority to acknowledge their own doubts.
I think Dennis is saying, as he goes on to muse about his own disaffection with his field, that unlike Milgram’s work most social psychological experimentation, while it might demonstrate that things are not as commonsensical as they seem, does so with such trivial findings that it cannot be an important contribution to social change. Moreover, he hints at what is perhaps one of the limitations — that the field’s own professional hierarchy and norms (which replicate those of society at large) may contribute to the maintenance of the status quo, diverting attention from issues that might actually contribute to change.
Dennis’ musings both help me to understand the significance of Milgram’s work from an insider’s prespective and refresh my sense of the importance of the weblogging endeavor at its best in encouraging the subversion of the dominant paradigm (or, as Dennis puts it, undermining pluralistic ignorance). FmH is probably at its most useful when I write about the emperor’s nakedness in nontrivial areas of his anatomy.
Seymour Hersh’s alternative history of Bush’s war
“The crack investigative reporter tells Salon about a disastrous battle the U.S. brass hushed up, the frightening True Believers in the White House, and how Iran, not Israel, may have manipulated us into war… In a new book, Chain of Command: The Road From 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, Hersh expands upon his work in the New Yorker to contribute new insights and revelations.”
Walking link to low dementia risk
“The study of over 2,000 men over 71 found those who walked least had almost twice the risk of developing dementia than those who walked the most.” (BBC)
A strident minority:
Anti-Bush US troops in Iraq: “Though military personnel lean conservative, some vocally support Kerry – or at least a strategy for swift withdrawal.” (Christian Science Monitor)
New Partnership
Tapped, the weblog over at The American Prospect, is reporting that:
This, just like Newt Gingrich’s old Contract, seems primarily to be a marketing gimmick, but here’s why you might want to get excited about it: The Dems who’ve been working on this for months are apparently very, very interested in improving the party’s effectiveness in framing issues and packaging positions in ways that resonate with voters. They’ve studied a lot of what Republicans have done over the last two decades and are making a conscious initial effort here to present a coherent, simple, bold agenda — just six points, I hear — that the caucus can get behind and promote and try to hammer into voters’ minds (it’s also a handy platform for congressional candidates to run on in November, just as Gingrich’s army of GOP freshmen did with the Contract in 1994). The folks in Nancy Pelosi’s Democratic leadership office who’ve been working on this apparently did lots of sophisticated polling and even enlisted the help of the Berkeley linguist and writer George Lakoff, author of this Prospect piece and this new book on the GOP’s effectiveness in framing issues. So whatever comes of this it’s at least heartening to see some real effort and attention to these issues on the Democratic side.”
I am particularly buoyed to see them using Lakoff’s — shall we say? — neurolinguistic programming techniques in crafting their message.
An Experiment in Dream Telepathy with The Grateful Dead
In what has been called the largest parapsychological experiment to date, psychologist Stanley Krippner and associates explored ESP and the dream phase of sleep with the assistance of the audience of a famous Grateful Dead concert in Port Chester NY in 1971. (Journal of the American Society of Psychosomatic Dentistry and Medicine) Krippner, who was at that time the head of the renowned Dream Laboratory at New York’s Maimonides Medical Center, is an illustrious psychologist who has been uncommonly unafraid of anomalous experiences and altered states of consciousness. The Dead were apt collaborators in an investigation of telepathy given the uncanny and unparalleled psychic amalgamation they achieved in their playing (and, some would say, achieved with their audiences as well), especially at the further reaches of their jams. (“We’re not in the entertainment business, we’re in the transportation business. We move minds.” — Mickey Hart) You can also read about the studies here (Fortean Times).
‘Excuse Me. May I Have Your Seat?’
The late, great social psychologist Stanley Milgram is well-known for several famous psychological experiments, about which I have written here from time to time. In one, he investigated how obedient subjects would be when, misled to believe they were experimenters, they were asked to inflict escalating pain on a supposed subject who was really a confederate of the researchers. (This has been described as the “How good a Nazi are you?” experiment and is one of the ‘great psychological experiments of the twentieth century’ described by psychiatrist and NY Times writer Lauren Slater in her controversial book of last year, Opening Skinner’s Box.) Another of Milgram’s studies established the renowned ‘six degrees of separation’ principle of social connectivity.
Thanks to several FmH readers who pointed me to this article from The New York Times. Milgram also sent his graduate students out onto the New York City subways with a simple directive — that they ask seated passengers for their seats. It was readily established that the proportion of recipients of such a request who would agree to give up their seat to an able-bodied stranger was surprisingly high, but the focus of the study was turned on its head in a fascinating way when it became apparent how difficult and anxiety-provoking the task was for the student investigators, some of whom became physically ill from the stress of doing so. Surprised at this, Milgram did it himself and confirmed how awful it made him feel. He speculated that one cause of the malaise may have been an unconscious need to be infirm to justify the request for a seat. I suspect that it is nearer to the truth to say that some of his investigators were experiencing viscerally the stress of violating what was apparently such a powerful unspoken social norm. Two NY Times reporters recently replicated this scenario and found that there has been no change in New Yorkers’ willingness to yield their seats upon request.
The discomfort it causes to make such a request dramatizes how differently wired the self-centered sociopaths among us must be, experiencing no compunctions as they routinely violate others’ rights in far more profound ways than depriving them of a subway seat.
The World’s Most Dangerous Ideas
- War on Evil By Robert Wright
- Undermining Free Will By Paul Davies
- Business as Usual at the U.N. By Samantha Power
- Spreading Democracy By Eric J. Hobsbawm
- Transhumanism By Francis Fukuyama
- Religious Intolerance By Martha Nussbaum
- Free Money By Alice M. Rivlin
- Hating America By Fareed Zakaria
Oh Ye of Little Faith…
Many hopeful people are looking to the debates to give Kerry a decisive push against Dubya. Ezra Klein tells us how to have faith:
Kerry’s Once Sizeable Lead with Women Voters Slips
The Democrats have taken the ‘gender gap’ advantage for granted in the last few elections, but Kerry’s lead among female voters is fading. Speculation is that women have been put off as Kerry has tried to project strength on foreign policy. He has squandered a natural advantage on such issues as abortion rights and benefits parity by softpedaling.
“The fact is that George Bush is the commander in chief of a war on choice,” said Gloria Feldt, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “Kerry needs to smoke Bush out and he also needs to advance his own agenda.” ‘
Kerry may feel he has more to lose with swing voters than he has to gain with women by advertising his stand on abortion. His largely male group of advisors has prevented him from taking a more vocal position, apparently feeling the women’s vote was a given. (LA Times)
Fantastic Four cast and running:
Michael Chiklis as the Thing; ought to be something to see. (Yahoo! News)
George Bush Accessory to Another Murder
Novak: Quick exit from Iraq is likely
Novak says that, regardless of the status of the insurgency, a reelected Bush administration would pull US forces out of Iraq early next year, right after the Iraqi elections. He cites unnamed but well-placed administration sources in saying that Condoleeza Rice and Paul Wolfowitz, who he predicts will head the Dept of State and the Dept of Defense respectively in the second term, will advocate for withdrawal. “Getting out of Iraq would end the neoconservative dream of building democracy in the Arab world. The United States would be content having saved the world from Saddam Hussein’s quest for weapons of mass destruction.” Novak says that president-elect Kerry would probably do the same thing as military leaders review the untenability of our situation there with him after his election, although this is more speculative than sourced. Of course Bush, who has a constitutional inability to admit a mistake, wiould not hint at such a plan until after the election. But it seems to me that Bush patsy Novak might spread this rumor regardless of its basis in reality, since it allows Bush supporters to have it both ways for the rest of the campaign in the face of Kerry’s attempts to make a focal issue of BUsh’s Iraq mistake. (Chicago Sun-Times)
Respek!
How does Ali G keep conning famous guests?
Banned Music
Think Wasabi Clears Your Sinuses? Think Again
New research with healthy volunteers shows it is actually probably a congestant. via increasing blood flow to the nasal mucosa. But, because it may stimulate nasal flaring, it gives the impression it is helping the person breathe more easily. (Yahoo! News ) During college, I spent three months vagabonding around Japan with a fellow student, bingeing on sushi whenever possible. Although I am not sure what role wasabi plays in this, we were convinced as we wandered around the phantasmagoric strrets of Shinjuku or Shibuya or the deer park in Nara that we had left the sushi counter ‘sushi-stoned’, a hitherto undocumented altered state of consciousness. And this was regardless of the extent to which we had been washing down our sushi with sake. Funny, there must be something lacking in American sushi because, although my friend and I attempt to recreate the experience whenever we get together these days in the US, we seem to be unable to do so…
Defeat Bush: The Guide
Researchers invent antenna for light
They say the device, using tiny carbon nanotubes, might serve as the basis for an optical television or for converting solar energy into electricity once properly developed.” (CNN)
Shrinking to Fit
China Discovers the Couch: Interesting article on the emerging psychotherapy industry in China by an LA Times staff writer who ties the appeal of and opportunity for ‘the couch’ to the rapid changes in Chinese society, seemingly oblivious to the irony that classical Freudian psychoanalytic theory largely ignored social stresses in favor of internal ‘neurotic’ ones fueled by conflicts and ultimately referrable to upbringing. The Chinese situation offers a fascinating opportunity to observe the propagation of the ‘psychological-mindedness’ meme through a naive society, both for the similarities and differences from the late 19th century spread of the therapy paradigm in Euro-American society.
Watching this trend raises many fascinating questions for me. Is the transition from a ‘planned economy to a free-market system’, as the author suggests, really the source of a dawning recognition by masses of Chinese that they ‘just aren’t happy’? Is there more stress in the current ‘competitive’ society than there was under state socialism? The article mentions corruption, layoffs and unemployment, and increasing class distinction. The famous 19th century French social theorist Emile Durkheim wrote of the relationship between societal suicide rates and various types of social stress; we have a naturalistic laboratory here to test his theories prospectively instead of merely retrospectively. If social change is driving the Chinese to increased distress and the need for therapy, how explicit will the equation between personal distress and social conditions be made by Chinese therapists? This has been a longstanding agenda of the radical therapy movement in the West, combating the classical internal-conflict paradigm and having therapists play a role in consciousness raising and catalysis of social change? Can Chinese therapists who themselves were raised for most of their lives in a totalitarian, anti-individualistic system easily incorporate an analysis of role of their clients’ social situations in their distress, or will this be ignored?
In terms of the social stresses and psychological dsistress they induce, should the Chinese and Euro-American routes to the ‘free-market’ economy be considered different routes to the same final common pathway, or quite distinct? Which is more true: that therapy become more possible or more necessary in a capitalist system? What role might the therapy paradigm play in increasing class distinctions in Chinese society between the growing urban professional class and the rural peasants?
One of the changes noted is the rapid explosion in Prozac prescriptions in China in the past several years. I would like to see an examination of how Eli Lilly penetrated the Chinese market; I am sure that in recent years, as their market share and profitability withered in the US market with the expiration of their patent and the emergence of competing drugs, they had been salivating over the potential Chinese market. What role does securing Chinese receptivity to Prozac play in driving home the psychological meme in Chinese society? In general, one of the great unresolved debates for me in Western mental health care revolves around whether changing therapeutic options in a sense create the need for themselves. This may be economic — as in the arrival of Prozac creating a market for itself — or memetic, as in starting to see everything as if it is a nail once you have a hammer in hand.
The article mentions that the demand for therapy has been driven by the penetration of internet access and Western media into the Chinese middle class. However, the portrayal of emotional distress and mental health care in the Western media has been anything but favorable; how will that influence Chinese expectations and demand?
In a society where people venerate their ancestors more than we do in the West, will the psychotherapeutic exploration of one’s upbringing challenge tradition, or itself be minimized in Chinese therapeutic technique? (Certain Western therapy techniques almost entirely dispense with exploration of the past in favor of problem-centered or cognitive explorations; will these be favored?) What influence, if clients’ upbringing is explored, will China’s one-child-per-family policy be seen as having on psychological health. I am curious about the differences in a society in which there is virtually no notion of a sibling relationship; it seems to me an entire category of intimacy, and the lexicon that goes with it, has been surgically excised from a society’s psyche.
What will we see in terms of gender differences in presentations to or access to therapy? Can therapy practices paly a role in adjusting gender inequality in Chinese society? Will the growth of psychological-mindedness contribute to a feminist movement and other movements for social equality, e.g. gay rights? This is especially important in light of the burgeoning penetration of HIV/AIDS into Chinese society and its concealment by Chinese government policy.
In the face of a rapid explosion of the need for mental health services, can state-sponsored social and economic planning influence the development of a system for care delivery that would be more equitable and responsive than the ‘free-market’ mental health care system? Can a developing mental health care system avoid the trap of tailoring itself to clients’ ability to afford the services rather than to their need for services? How essential, as opposed to optional, will the right to mental health services and emotional wellbeing be seen as being?
Finally, if Bush is reelected, is there a market for my services in China that might make it attractive for a disaffected US psychiatrist to consider emigrating? <grin>
U.S. Leaks Report of No Weapons in Iraq
Researchers invent antenna for light
They say the device, using tiny carbon nanotubes, might serve as the basis for an optical television or for converting solar energy into electricity once properly developed.” (CNN)
Far graver than Vietnam
“Most senior US military officers now believe the war on Iraq has turned into a disaster on an unprecedented scale“, says Sidney Blumenthal.
But, according to the US military’s leading strategists and prominent retired generals, Bush’s war is already lost. Retired general William Odom, former head of the National Security Agency, told me: ‘Bush hasn’t found the WMD. Al-Qaida, it’s worse, he’s lost on that front. That he’s going to achieve a democracy there? That goal is lost, too. It’s lost.’ He adds: ‘Right now, the course we’re on, we’re achieving Bin Laden’s ends.'” (Guardian.UK)
Why You Should Ignore The Polls
The Left Coaster believes that Gallup greatly oversamples the Republican component of its poll participants, because of an unwavering assumption that a greater percentage of those turning out to vote will be Republicans than Democrats.
And Jimmy Breslin tells you you might as well make up the poll results yourself for all they are worth, making much of the fact that those will cellular phones instead of landlines are never polled by current methodologies, which means younger voters are disproportionately ignored. (NewsDay)
Pointed to by a reader in the comments, this site amplifies on Breslin’s point, mentioning VoIP customers who get to choose their area codes (although I suspect this a vanishingly small proportion of the electorate).
Newfound Comet Set for Winter Display
Comets brightness is notoriously difficult to predict, however, and it is too early to know whether this one will put on a memorable show.” (Yahoo! News)
Housekeeping
Is the commenting system broken, or is nothing I’m logging worth commenting upon? There haven’t been any comments here in days. Or is no one even visiting? Did everyone get out of the habit of reading FmH when I took several weeks off from making entries here this summer?
Let’s try something. Instead of you just answering the above questions in your comments to this post, why not make this an open discussion thread? Enter a comment about anything on your mind that you would like to discuss with other FmH readers, such as they might be…
The War Room
FmH readers know I am a fan of fellow traveller and Wired contributing editor Steve Silberman’s writing. This new piece is, he wrote me, “the first look inside a new Pentagon-sponsored training program for soldiers headed to Iraq and elsewhere that immerses them in highly realistic virtual environments designed by Hollywood special effects artists.” Silberman’s article on this unholy alliance is all about the romance of the advanced technology being used and the cost savings to the Pentagon, which won’t have to waste so much ammunition in live fire exercises anymore. What I would have liked to see, and what is virtually absent from the piece, is something about the moral compunctions I imagine some of the Hollywood or computer-geek types might have about contributing to the war machine. Or are my expectations about a generation behind? Steve?
Is ‘Florida’ synonymous with ‘hanky-panky’?
It is amazing, one would have thought that after the national outrage about the Florida ballot shenanigans of 2000, the state’s Division of Elections would have to tread lightly in 2004. But, no fans of subtlety, getting away with it in 2000 seems to have emboldened them to even more clumsy manipulations this time around. We have already heard about the mysterious visits uniformed officers have been paying to elderly African American voters suggesting some ill-defined investigation of their right to vote, in an obvious attempt to scare them away from the polls. Now, despite a court order against putting Nader on the Florida ballot, the Republican chief of the Division of Elections is using Hurricane Ivan as a pretext to do so anyway. If the hurricane interfered, the ballots could not be prepared in time if she waited for a Wednesday hearing on the court injunction, she ruled, so Nader’s name should appear just in case he wins the right to be there. If he doesn’t belong on the ballot, any Nader votes would just have to be discarded. (The American Prospect) See also this (BBC).
FmH: ‘a classic blog with some humorous stuff’??
This weblogger known as Reinman, who has been writing a weblog for only 17 posts and one month, posted a review of FmH because, apparently finding my site at random, he was pleasantly surprised by the soft drink post below. This 20-year old Minnesota student and football fan whose tastes run to Fiddler on the Roof, Lawrence of Arabia, The Catcher in the Rye and The King James Bible, is kind enough to say that my anti-Bush sentiment (from his vast experience perusing the weblog universe, he puzzles about whether all bloggers are of that persuasion) doesn’t get in the way of his enjoyment of ‘some of the stuff on the site’.
He seems to be looking for ‘humorous references to pop. culture’ which (sound of headscratching) he seems to find best characterize the material at FmH. Funny, I didn’t think I was being all that funny all that often. However, he concludes in the last analysis that there isn’t much reason, other than the soft drink map, to come here, because “if… you’re craving… a classic blog with some humorous stuff”, he thinks he does it better. More power to him.
Tragically, he announces that his series on “blogging the bloggers” is to end with FmH, the fifth he reviews. He makes the curious comment that he is “not planning any prequels”, which allows him to come out with a witticism about how
I think I get it. Come to think of it, this post may qualify as a ‘humorous reference to pop. culture’. I wouldn’t know how else to categorize it, so maybe Reinman is onto something.
Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan
The US and its coalition attempted to use the violations of UN resolutions to legitimize the invasion. Now, as Annan finally breaks his ‘tactful silence’ and delegitimizes the war, coalition representatives continue to try to have it both ways, both insisting the war conforms to the UN charter and saying the UN is a useless agency obstructed by differences of opinion within its ranks. (Guardian.UK)
The slacker’s new bible
The art and the importance of doing the least possible in the workplace:
1 You are a modern day slave. There is no scope for personal fulfilment. You work for your pay-check at the end of the month, full stop.
2 It’s pointless to try to change the system. Opposing it simply makes it stronger.
3 What you do is pointless. You can be replaced from one day to the next by any cretin sitting next to you. So work as little as possible and spend time (not too much, if you can help it) cultivating your personal network so that you’re untouchable when the next restructuring comes around.
4 You’re not judged on merit, but on whether you look and sound the part. Speak lots of leaden jargon: people will suspect you have an inside track
5 Never accept a position of responsibility for any reason. You’ll only have to work harder for what amounts to peanuts.
6 Make a beeline for the most useless positions, (research, strategy and business development), where it is impossible to assess your ‘contribution to the wealth of the firm’. Avoid ‘on the ground’ operational roles like the plague.
7 Once you’ve found one of these plum jobs, never move. It is only the most exposed who get fired.
8 Learn to identify kindred spirits who, like you, believe the system is absurd through discreet signs (quirks in clothing, peculiar jokes, warm smiles).
9 Be nice to people on short-term contracts. They are the only people who do any real work.
10 Tell yourself that the absurd ideology underpinning this corporate bullshit cannot last for ever. It will go the same way as the dialectical materialism of the communist system. The problem is knowning when…
The American Elevator Doesn’t Go All the Way to the Top:
Voices from the Underground:
![Bring the war home! //www.lib.uconn.edu/%7Eeembardo/voices/images/LiberationNewsSvcn182_jpg.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/www.lib.uconn.edu/~eembardo/voices/images/LiberationNewsSvcn182_jpg.jpg)
Radical Protest and the Underground Press in the “Sixties”: An Exhibition (University of Connecticut Libraries)
Burning Bushes
A reader’s guide to Kitty Kelley’s The Family: “Want the best (if somewhat dubious) dish from The Family, Kitty Kelley’s new treatise on the Bush clan? Follow Slate‘s reading guide straight to the good parts.” As others have noted, unfortunately there is nothing here that will bring down the Bush misadministration or even change the minds of those who are going to vote for him…
Bush’s Lost Year
“By deciding to invade Iraq, the Bush Administration decided not to do many other things: not to reconstruct Afghanistan, not to deal with the threats posed by North Korea and Iran, and not to wage an effective war on terror. An inventory of opportunities lost.” — James Fallow (The Atlantic)
Online Essays by Gary Snyder
- Snyder on his relationship with Jack Kerouac
“Jack was, in a sense, a twentieth-century American Lithographer. And that’s why maybe those novels will stand up, because they will be one of the best statements of the myth of the twentieth century. just as Ginsberg represents one clear archetypal aspect of twentieth century America, I think Jack saw me, in a funny way, as being another archetypal twentieth-century American of the West, of the anarchist, libertarian, IWW tradition, of a tradition of working outdoors and fitting in already with his fascination with the hobo, railroad bum, working man. I was another dimension on that.”
- “Four Changes” 1970
“We are the first human beings in history to have all of humanity’s culture and previous experience available to our study — the first members of a civilized society since the early Neolithic to wish to look clearly into the eyes of the wild and see our selfhood, our family, there. We have these advantages to set off the obvious disadvantages of being as screwed up as we are — which gives us a fair chance to penetrate into some of the riddles of ourselves and the universe.”
- The Dhrma Eye of d.a.levy
“d.a.levy – Darryl Levy – I try out his names, reaching to know the man; his poems, his polemics. I feel brother to Levy not only as poet but as fellow-worker in the Buddha-fields. Levy had a remarkable karma: he saw who he was, where he was, what his field of activity was, and what his tools were to be.”
R.I.P. Johnny Ramone
Only one of the four Ramones is left alive now thirty years after the founding of the band, as the guitarist and co-founder of ‘seminal’ punk band dies at 55. (CNN)
Christopher Lydon Interviews… :
“Is it too late to frame this election game of 2004 as a choice: Empire or Republic?“
L’Shana Tovah
Since sundown last night, it has been year 5765 of the Jewish calendar. In Jewish tradition, that means 5765 years since the creation of the universe. Maybe this is inaccurate, but it emphasizes what order of magnitude we should place on each of our years anyway. It has always made sense to me to celebrate two new year’s days each year, one when the cyclical dimming of the days turns to the promise of renewal of the natural world at the winter solstice; and the other more aligned with the cycle of human activity, when the fallow time of late summer transitions into the renewed activity of the autumn, whether we are talking about the annual cycle of agricultural activity, of the school year or the world of commerce and the fiscal year.
The two types of new year’s celebrations also have a somewhat different emphasis. It has always seemed to me that the ritual of the Pagan New Year we celebrate in the winter, attuning oneself to the natural order of things, stands to invoke good fortune for the year to come. The Jewish New Year is more about setting oneself straight with manmade standards of right living, opening as it does the ten days of awe culminating in the Day of Atonement.
It is said that the life unexamined is the life unlived. This is a time to use in reflection on the year just past, in order to live the next fully. How much time was wasted? Were your days filled with life or dull routine? Was love expressed or left unsaid? Was there real companionship with those around you or a growing apart and a taking for granted? Were the kind deeds done or postponed? the gibes unleashed or the tongue held? Have you worked for peace and social justice as much as you could have? Did you acquire only things, or insights and knowledge as well? Have you freely asked for and granted forgiveness ? Did you deceive others? yourself?
Finding oneself wanting, as I do, in some or all of these regards helps in considering the uses to which one will put the year to come. What I do with my next year is important, because I will pay for it with a year of my life, and I hope I do not regret the price.
So, to all my readers Jewish and otherwise, a happy new year. I pray for assistance being kind to my fellow creatures and working for peace. I ask your forgiveness if I have wronged any of you reading this, and I absolve anyone of you who has wronged or offended me.
Move Over, Hummer
US commercial truck maker touts ‘extreme’ passenger truck. Modelled after comercial haulage trucks and dump trucks, the International CXT will be the world’s biggest pick-up truck when it goes on sale later this year. 600-1000 of these babies are expected to be manufactured the first year, for the likes of tradesman and builders. But, at $95-100,000 apiece, aren’t we likely to see most of them snapped up by rappers and movie stars instead? Just when you thought SUVs were losing their appeal and it was safe to get back on the highway…
Major Medical Journals Will Require Registration of Trials
The plan, news of which had emerged earlier this week, represents a major policy shift by influential gatekeepers in the medical profession as they seek to increase the distribution and accuracy of research data. Too often, experts contend, medical studies with dramatic findings are highlighted as breakthroughs, while inconclusive or negative tests of the same treatment are ignored or undisclosed.
‘Honest reporting begins with revealing the existence of all clinical studies, even those that reflect unfavorably on a research sponsor’s product,’ the editors of the 12 publications stated in a group editorial that was released yesterday and will appear in the next issues of the individual journals. ‘Unfortunately, selective reporting does occur and it distorts the body of evidence available for clinical decision-making.’
The group, which calls itself the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, includes such high-profile publications as The Journal of the American Medical Association, The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Annals of Internal Medicine.” (New York Times)
I join those in applauding this as an important first step toward full disclosure in clinical drug research. Anyone who is an intelligent consumer of medical research studies has no confidence in the body of literature. Biases in favor of publishing positive findings arise both from the simple fact that a positive finding is more ‘sexy’ to report and from the increasingly, and depressingly, consistent reliance for research funding on precisely those pharmaceutical companies with a stake in the outcome. Publishing preponderantly positive findings skews medical practice toward newer and newer (and more and more expensive) medications, of course. Several sorts of studies tend never to make it to the light of day. There are those which say that a particular treatment did not show benefits significantly different than placebo. Other studies show that a new medication is no better than the old standard reference medication against which it is being compared. And a third sort of study will show that adverse effects emerged, or a medication was not tolerated well enough, often enough that patients would not stick with it to derive therapeutic gains. When these studies are not published, the adverse reactions they describe, of obvious importance for a physician to know, are from that point potentially dead and buried forever.
The impact of this reform on the evidentiary basis for medical practice will depend on whether it is adopted far more widely than by just a handful of, admittedly influential, journals. (I see none of the preeminent journals in which psychiatric medication findings are published on the list, for one thing.) Of course, since the proportion of physicians who keep up with their field of practice by actually reading the refereed journals is so small and continues to decline, the pharmaceutical representatives’ ‘detail’ visits and the drug-company-sponsored dinner talks and junkets from which many physicians learn about new medications will be free to continue to spin the merits of their latest and greatest breakthrough drug with no pretense of being fair and balanced. Even among those consumers of the medical literature, we will have to face the inherent cognitive bias toward remembering and being influenced by positive findings as well.
Critics of the reform plan are asking for government regulations requiring this sort of registration database for clinical trials, rather than a voluntary system initiated by a fragment of the medical publications. A more profound step would be to get the pharmaceutical industry out of the role of funding the preponderance of drug studies and returning to the old system of government-funded research. Or perhaps pharmaceutical companies should pool their research funds and endow a foundation to give out grants rather than each doing it individually. It is hard to see what incentive the industry would have to do so and forego both the PR value of their research funding and the potential influence over the findings unless, again, there is some government mandate. This impetus for reform may well be the silver lining in the midst of the cloud of the furor about SSRIs and suicidality among adolescents and children, about which FmH readers doubtless know my position.
George W. Bush Scorecard of Evil
So you cannot make much headway convincing your swing-voter friend not to vote for Bush on the basis of Iraq alone? Here is the rest of the scorecard for the worst president of the postwar epoch.
Somatic medicine abuses psychiatry…
…and neglects causal research. ”Since I am a psychiatrist, I have for a long time been intrigued by the extraordinary use of psychiatric causal explanations for illnesses that not only go with predominantly somatic symptoms, but also lack any basic similarity to known mental disorders.” — Per Dalen (The Art Bin)
NASCAR, How Proud a Sound!
Winning minds, not hearts
List of misquotations
Wikipedia’s Wikiquote project has compiled this list of what you thought were famous quotations… but aren’t.
Round One for Women’s Health
In the latest ruling, last week in Nebraska, Judge Richard Kopf found that the politicians who crafted the statute erred by failing to provide any exception for instances where a woman’s health is at stake – replicating a key defect that led the Supreme Court to invalidate a similar abortion ban in Nebraska in 2000. Judge Kopf, an appointee of President Bush’s father, also presided at the trial stage in that earlier case.
He devoted much of his lengthy new decision to a meticulous review of the extensive, freshly amassed evidence. He refuted Congress’s flimsy legislative ‘finding’ that the ill-defined procedure it bans ‘is never necessary to protect the health of the mother,’ and therefore no exception was needed. Judge Kopf said the evidence, to the contrary, was ‘overwhelming.’ He wrote, ‘In the absence of an exception for the health of a woman, banning the procedure constitutes a significant heath hazard to women.'” (New York Times op-ed)
Generic Names for Soft Drinks by County
This US map uses color to depict the most popular term used in every county of the US — ‘pop’, ‘coke’, ‘soda’ or something else. The gross regional differences are pretty clear but what grabs my attention are the anomalies. Why are there single counties in the middle of Nebraska, North Dakota, Colorado and Idaho, for example, where ‘soda’ predominates in the midst of ‘pop’? And what is going on in the large, circumscribed regions of Nevada, northern Minnesota and New Mexico where some other term predominates, as well as scattered counties in North Carolina and Texas? Anyone from any of those regions reading? How do you refer to soft drinks there?? (via Incoming Signals)
Hepster’s Dictionary
Coalition of the Disgusted
Kevin Murphy advises: “Aside from the Philippines, Nigeria, and Poland, the world wants John Kerry by a landslide. Undecided voters out there, you know how you can ‘Ask the Audience’ on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire when you’re stumped? Consider it like that.” (ghost in the machine)
Heritage Forests Campaign:
Our Forests at Risk: For lovers of wilderness, this is an emergency.
The day this proposal takes effect, millions of acres of our last wild forests will be immediately at risk. “
Get involved; bowing to public pressure, the administration has just extended the comment period through November 15. Check out what is at stake and send your own message directly to the relevant decision makers today.
![Jack Hensley //us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20040921/amdf702251.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20040921/amdf702251.jpg)
Only one of the four Ramones is left alive now thirty years after the founding of the band, as