Skakel Convicted in 1975 Beating Death of Greenwich Neighbor New York Times

The world’s flags given letter grades — “Caveat: If you are apt to be offended by sarcastic humour directed towards your national flag, I suggest you go no further.” [via boing boing]

Mozilla 1.0 released after four long years The Register

Dennis Fox, professor of legal studies and psychology at the University of Illinois and a co-founder of the Radical Psychology Network, wrote: Cautions for the Left on Israel and Palestine [a.k.a. “The Shame of the Pro-Palestinian Left”]: :…too many activists on the American left, in their zeal to remedy the Palestinians’ plight, don’t apply principles evenhandedly. I see three overlapping challenges facing the developing movement for Middle East peace and justice…”

Even many of Israel’s long-time supporters now understand that, to provide justice to Palestinians — and to salvage democracy and morality within the Jewish State itself — the thirty-five-year occupation must end. Two weeks ago, to further that goal, American Jewish critics of Israel founded the national Covenant of Justice and Peace, building on the work of older groups around the country. On the other side, a recent call by Palestinian human rights lawyer Jonathan Kuttab and Nonviolence International director Mubarak Awad to transform the Palestinian armed struggle into militant non-violent resistance is attracting growing attention.

So let’s remember that justice and liberation, democracy and safety, can only come about if they come to all of us, together. Let’s not deplore only one side’s racism; or propose remedies that discount one side’s valid needs; or accept the argument that one side has the right to kill uninvolved civilians. Recognition that Israel’s occupation oppresses Palestinians is central. But the justice-based left must seek analyses and solutions built on general principles, and reject those that make new forms of oppression inevitable.

Alexander Cockburn wrote a scathing response, Is criticism of Israel anti-Semitic? “On rhetorical border-grabbing in the media” in Working for Change, a slightly different version of which also appeared in Counterpunch and The Nation. “Over the past 20 years, I’ve learned there’s a quick way of figuring just how badly Israel is behaving. There’s a brisk uptick in the number of articles here by Jews accusing the left of anti-Semitism.” In my opinion (and Fox’s as well), Cockburn sets Fox up as a straw man, ignoring considerable areas of agreement in deserved criticism of Israel in his inimitable, shrill, radicaler-than-thou style. Here is Fox’s rejoinder, Cockburn’s Distorting Lens. The more I read of Cockburn these days, the more I marvel at how he chooses to devote his energies…

Hubble’s NICMOS is back in business: “The revived Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer aboard NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope has penetrated layers of dust in a star-forming cloud to uncover a dense, craggy edifice of dust and gas [image at right].” NASA

The real bio-threat:

Currently the United States is experiencing shortages of eight of the eleven vaccines required by law for children: measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), varicella (chicken pox), and pneumococcal disease (meningitis). In response, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have revised their immunization schedule from “optimal” to “some protection,” which means that, depending on the vaccine, kids may get the first shot and not the boosters that solidify immunity, or they may not get the first shot at all until several months past the recommended age. In response to the shortages, some states are relaxing their demands that kids get vaccinated before they come to school this September. In Oregon, for example, seven-year-olds will be allowed to forgo chicken pox shots and diphtheria/tetanus boosters; Texas is deferring the diphtheria/tetanus booster shot required for all 14-year-olds. Which is scary, because children aren’t the only ones at risk: Spotty vaccination cycles for diseases such as rubella and chicken pox mean that children may grow to adulthood without immunity, remaining at risk for diseases that cause many more complications for adults and can have devastating effects for pregnant women. The New Republic

Networking: It’s not just for parties anymore: “Newly discovered principles show the similarity between networks of all kinds — from the Internet to Al Qaeda.” Simson Garfinkel reviews Linked by physicist Albert-László Barabási. CS Monitor

Questionable Quotes (Black Tuesday): Snopes is not sure Bush really uttered the incredible “Do you have blacks, also?” quotation attributed to him by Der Spiegel, in an article to which I blinked, during a meeting with Brazilian president Cardoso. [thanks, David]

Blogging Goes Legit, Sort Of: “Blogging, a latter-day home page for some and a place to pretend

you’re a journalist for others, is now part of a major university’s J-

school curriculum.” Wired

Ghost in the Machine has moved.

Economically Incorrect:

“Last week, ABC officially announced what many industry watchers had expected for several months: The late-night talk show Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher would be canceled, and replaced in the fall by a new entertainment program hosted by Comedy Central’s Jimmy Kimmel. When the news broke, most media reports pegged Politically Incorrect’s demise on Maher’s “unpatriotic” remarks in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Yet while there’s some truth to the notion, this interpretation ignores other, more powerful market forces that have worked to replace an important televised forum of political dissent with the latest incarnation of “must-sleaze” TV.” The American Prospect

“Student Who Heckled Former President Bush in 1998 Must Go to Trial, Texas High Court Rules.” ABC And: “A U.S. Air Force colonel who called President Bush ‘a joke’ and accused him of allowing the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to happen because ‘his presidency was going nowhere,’ has been suspended and could face a court-martial.” Sacramento Bee

Self-Annihilating Sentences

US fighter pilots from the squadron that killed four Canadian troops in an April ‘friendly-fire’ mishap had complained of exhaustion to their commander shortly before the fatal accident, after they had misidentified a bombing target during a prior mission (over Iraq, where they were flying sorties over the southern no-fly zone as well as missions over Afghanistan). They asked for more rest, noting that official standards for the interval between missions were not being observed. Their concerns were dismissed and they were told to speak to the flight surgeon about amphetamines. Vancouver Sun

“Blogtank is an experimental team weblog the purpose of which is to determine whether a group of bloggers from various professions and backgrounds can form a new kind of self-organizing consulting group for debate, research and discussion.” Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be anything captivating about it (yet?). Maybe you had to be there (I’m not.).

Don’t get nutty on your loved one. Yahoo! News

Furor over American Muslim student’s Harvard commencement address with buzzword ‘jihad’ in title NY Times

“You want to write a novel about a world ruled by corporations, you’re going to end up naming a few brands. What happens then if you invoice those companies for product placement? Read about author Jim Munroe’s attempts to get some blood from corporate stone.” AdBusters

Found Letters from Kittyville. Some are quite funny, some poignant, some can’t be made heads or tails of.

Lessons From Madness: “Reviews of two books about mental illness: Mad in America by Robert Whitaker and Madness: A Brief History by Roy Porter… Dissimilar in style, approach, and size, the two works are surprisingly complementary. Porter provides a deft examination of how Western cultures from antiquity through modern times have tried to explain and treat insanity, while Whitaker probes in depth the mostly uncaring and usually ineffective way America has treated the “mad.” Here’s the important part about the “dirty little secret” of American medicine:

Though his book is ostensibly about “madness,” Whitaker delves into drug trials. In doing so, he raises broader questions about the “purity” of academic research and peer-reviewed publications, the standard by which the medical profession judges new findings. Whitaker describes how drug testing became part of a new, for-profit drug testing industry, with some community physicians, hit by the new strictures of managed care and looking for ways to supplement their incomes. Traditionally, academic researchers had conducted drug trials, a process that seemed to ensure impartiality since the studies were carefully designed to eliminate any bias. But the process was slow and delays were costly to drugmakers.

The Atlantic

Related: Medical journal statistics potentially “misleading”:

Reports of treatment trials in top international medical journals usually include only the most flattering statistical result, a new analysis reveals. This could mislead doctors and patients into believing a drug or procedure is more effective than it actually is, say researchers at the University of California, Davis.

Jim Nuovo and his team studied all randomised controlled trials with positive treatment results published in the British Medical Journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the Annals of Internal Medicine in 1989, 1992, 1995 and 1998. All 359 papers included the relatively favourable “relative risk reduction” – the percentage difference between the treatment and control group.

But only eight reported the “number needed to treat” – the number of people a doctor would need to treat before the drug prevented a bad outcome, such as stroke, heart attack or death. And only 18 included “absolute risk reduction” – the actual difference between the treatment results compared to the control group. New Scientist

And: Medical press releases may exaggerate results and fail to include study limitations:

Some medical press releases use formats that may exaggerate the perceived importance of findings and do not routinely highlight study limitations, according to DMS researchers in the June 5 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) by Steven Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz.

Steven Woloshin, MD, and Lisa M. Schwartz, MD, of Dartmouth Medical School and the White River Junction Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group examined the medical press release process at several high-profile medical journals and reviewed recent releases to evaluate how study findings are presented and whether limitations and potential conflicts of interest are acknowledged.

While medical journals strive to ensure accuracy and the acknowledgment of limitations in articles, press releases may not reflect these efforts, say the authors. EurekAlert

Repaired Space Camera Shows Four-Galaxy Collision: “(A) composite image, released today, from the Hubble Space Telescope shows the collision of four galaxies located 1 billion light-years from Earth and the creation of a torrent of new stars.” NY Times

Weird Sunset: “On June 10, 2002, something extraordinary will happen to the setting Sun

over North America.” NASA

Looking beyond the rhetoric:

“The leaderships on both sides cannot resist playing politics. They cater to certain lobbies or create a camouflage of words to disguise their real intent. President Pervez Musharraf in his speech uses strong words against India essentially to negate an impression that he is giving in to Indian or international pressure on the issue of infiltration. Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee has been threatening war for some time now without any serious hostile action on the ground. He needs to appear tough to an Indian public angry after terrorist attacks on Parliament and in Jammu. The real action if any is behind the scenes with diplomatic exchanges taking place under the watchful eyes of America.” –Shafqat Mahmood, former Pakistani gov’t official. Rediff.com

Inmate Whose Lawyer Slept Gets New Trial: “The Supreme Court, acting in a case that has come to crystallize arguments over the adequacy of legal representation in death penalty cases, today let stand an appellate ruling that a Texas death row inmate is entitled to a new trial because his lawyer fell asleep repeatedly during his original trial.”NY Times At least he’s still alive for another chance…

More chronicling of intelligence failure in today’s Times. The media are on the bandwagon now, it appears; look for a cascade of this sort of thing with the pending Congressional hearings:

C.I.A. Was Tracking Hijacker Months Earlier Than It Had Said: “The Central Intelligence Agency says in a classified chronology submitted to Congress recently that it picked up the trail of a Qaeda operative who turned out to be a Sept. 11 hijacker months earlier than was previously known, government officials said today.”

A Witness Against Al Qaeda Says the U.S. Let Him Down: “An Egyptian-American pilot who helped prosecutors penetrate Al Qaeda says his life took a harsh turn after he agreed to aid the F.B.I. in its war on terror.”

“Blogtrack is very much a work in progress, but very much done. (It) allows you to check if your favorite websites have been updated …by going to the blogtrack website

or by using blogtrack’s instant messenger interface (for AIM/MSN/ICQ and Yahoo!). It is a free, not-yet open source project which is redundantly alive only to better itself. It is smart about pages with random information/features…”

So God Is Really in the Details? Oxford professor of philosophy Richard Swinburne uses Bayes’ Theorem to prove that Jesus was resurrected from the dead. NY Times [thanks to Richard Homonoff]

Brain injuries from thrill rides LA Times

A New Thinking Emerges About Consciousness:

“The feeling you have as you read this sentence, (Harvard neuroscientist Daniel) Wegner argues, is an illusion pulled off by a complex machine in your skull. It not only reads and understands this sentence, he says, but also makes you feel as if you have experienced the reading of the sentence. In other words, the brain, not content with being a remarkably complex machine, also convinces itself that it isn’t a machine at all.

But why would it bother? The brain, Wegner contends, produces consciousness to give itself a feeling of having done something. This feeling helps the brain recognize similar situations when they arise — the next article in the newspaper, for instance. Being aware of its actions, the brain-machine can better decide whether to read another article.” Washington Post

It’s the cat’s meow: Not language, strictly speaking, but close enough to skillfully manage humans, communication study shows. “Test your fluency in Cat. Click on the cats to hear their meows. One is expressing contentment, the other urgency. Can you tell which is which?”

Incest accusations of the recovered-memory craze tore families apart. Now one of its leaders wants to let bygones be bygones. Review of the new book by co-author of the abuse survivors’ ‘bible’ The Courage to Heal: Thought We’d Never Speak Again: The Road From Estrangement to Reconciliation by Laura Davis Salon

Book review: New British Philosophy: the interviews edited by Julian Baggini and Jeremy Stangroom —

Where have all the philosophers gone? Asked to name a living philosopher, most educated people in Britain might come up with Jacques Derrida. Ask them for something they know about contemporary philosophy, and they might venture the opinion that Derrida is “the one who talks nonsense”. The early 20th century witnessed a bumper crop of great figures such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell, Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. Less resounding but still significant contributions were made mid-century by the likes of Hilary Putnam, Willard Quine, Saul Kripke and others. However, there is little sign of anyone under the age of 40 ready to take their place today. If there are any candidates to emerge in this country, they may well be found in the pages of New British Philosophy, an absorbing collection of interviews with 16 of the nation’s rising stars. Many of them are the right side of middle age and primed to produce their best work. New Statesman

Biologist’s reading of lonely-hearts personal ads reveals what big-city women really want: Men with money. “In densely populated and resource-demanding environments, birds and women may not be all that different.”

Thanks to David Walker for pointing me to this List of American Food Holidays: “Looking to find their niche into the greeting card market, here are some food themed holidays that you should know about.” I’m always looking for another excuse to celebrate…

The World Rock Paper Scissors Society:

“The World RPS Society is dedicated to the promotion of Rock Paper Scissors as a fun and safe way to resolve disputes. We feel that conserving the roots of RPS is essential for the growth and development of the game and the players. The World RPS Society is involved in many areas of the sport, such as; research studies, workshops, tournaments at both local and international levels, book publishing, and much more.”

The site includes a history of RPS, a strategy guide and an online trainer, as well as links to additional RPS resources.

How a Side Effect Might Turn Into Success: interesting story of medical serendipity and biotech ambition — grandiosity? — in its own right, and additionally interesting to me as I went to high school with this guy.

Paul Westerberg reemerges in two-CD Stereo/Mono: ‘Westerberg, 42, hasn’t sounded this carefree, non-attitudinal and delightfully ragtag since 1983’s Hootenanny, one of several cult-beloved albums by his notorious old band the Replacements.’

Following All the Rules in a Close Encounter With a Grizzly: “…The five-minute face-off became painful, she explained in a telephone interview, only after the grizzly released the grip of his jaws, which he had gently clamped on her right thigh.” NY Times I had a similar close encounter with a bear twenty-odd years ago in the Sierras above Yosemite Valley, although fortunately it was not a grizzly…

Hysteria Hysteria

Last fall, something peculiar began to happen at more than two dozen elementary and middle schools scattered across the country. Suddenly, groups of children started breaking out with itchy red rashes that seemed to fade away when the children went home — and to pop up again when they returned to school. Frustratingly for the federal, state and county health officials who were working to explain this ailment, it did not conform to any known patterns of viral or bacterial illness.

The children had no other symptoms: no fever, no runny noses, no headaches or joint pain or respiratory complaints. Moreover, they were not passing their rashes on to parents or siblings outside school. Large groups (a dozen here, several dozen there) came down with it simultaneously, or within hours, rather than over the course of days or weeks, as you would expect with person-to-person transmission of a contagious illness. Then there was the nagging fact that in many of the outbreaks, girls accounted for a majority of the cases. Since neither germs nor the other likely culprit, environmental poisons, make a habit of discriminating by sex, this was puzzling news indeed.

(…)

This year, rashes — or any unexplained physical symptom — made people nervous in a way they did not before 9/11. Or maybe it was the other way around. Maybe it was nervousness that helped create the unexplained symptoms. And maybe children were more likely to somaticize a lingering, inchoate anxiety about 9/11. Studies completed on New York schoolchildren this spring, for example, showed that months after the terrorist attacks, many of them still suffered from recurrent nightmares and trouble sleeping. Kids in other parts of the country surely experienced similar anxieties. And maybe, just maybe, this latent disquiet sometimes manifested itself in a curious, corporeal way — in the form of an itch.

NY Times Magazine

Apart from the question of a relationship to 9-11, the article raises fascinating issues about the status of the notion of ‘epidemic hysteria’ or ‘mass psychogenic illness’, difficult to accept but certainly real, with many documented outbreaks in the medical literature, which often affect the skin. (As any dermatologist will confirm, this organ is extremely psychologically sensitive.) It is both conceptually difficult to accept and considered pejorative by most of the public to suggest that a bodily reaction can be caused solely by, and be the sole observable manifestation of, one’s psychological state. More ‘loaded’ has been the political incorrectness of the concept of hysteria from a feminist perspective. The article suggests — and I agree — that there ought to be ways to accept both that this is “all in the head” and that a preponderence of those affected were female, without pejorative connotations.

Heart of Cheapness: “In one of the oddest enterprises in the history of development economics, Bono – the lead singer for the rock band U2 – has been touring Africa with Paul O’Neill, secretary of the treasury. For a while, the latent tensions between the two men were masked by Bono’s courtesy; but on Monday he lost his cool.”  NY Times

A reader asks:

I’m struck by your insight back in 1984 when you suggested that Reagan might be developing Alzheimer’s disease. Would you feel comfortable making such a suggestion again if you thought it were warranted?

I ask because I believe you’ve cautioned against long-distance diagnoses (unless I’m confusing stuff you’ve written from other things I’ve read online and off). You’ve gained 18 years of experience and wisdom since 1984, and I wonder whether you still think it was a good idea to make your long-distance diagnosis about Reagan.

It’s a tricky question because you were correct back then. But, generally speaking, do you think it’s a good idea for a doctor to say of a presidential candidate, “I think he should be checked out because, from what I see on TV, he exhibits signs of X disease or Y malfunction.”? That’s much different from saying, “I believe he should be checked out mentally and physically as a matter of policy.”

Thanks for the question. It is at times like these that I wish I were satisfied by any of the online comment systems for blogs [having flirted with a few, as readers will recall, and uninstalling each for one reason or another…]

In any case, I do indeed have qualms about diagnosing without doing a face-to-face history and examination of a patient. Probably, the public comments I’ve made (on FmH) have been cavils about the ‘parlor games’ of explaining the behavior of long-dead historical personages by a brilliant stroke of diagnosis without any medical evidence, as well as the worrisome proliferation of web-based psychotherapeutic treatment and medication prescribing sight unseen by physicians and allied health professionals I consider unscrupulous and unethical for doing so. Since I’m ‘out’ as a psychiatrist on the web, I have also — not very frequently, it turns out — received emails privately requesting medical or psychiatric advice and have demurred on those same grounds. In essence, my position is that it is (a) unethical to diagnose outside the confines of the doctor-patient treatment contract; (b) more likely to be inaccurate without the iterative process a face-to-face presence allows; and, finally, (c) it may interfere significantly with some existing treatment relationship the patient already has. [This is for a different discussion altogether, but this last point follows from my conviction that much diagnosis is not the delivery of an incontrovertible medical fact to the patient, but rather the weaving of a web of consensus with them. A diagnosis is one, shared, way of making sense of the data the patient has brought you about their current suffering, and its value depends on its explanatory power, which involves not only its scientific plausibility but the interpersonal context in which it is embedded.]

While I turned out to be correct in worrying in 1984 that Reagan had Alzheimer’s Disease, I don’t think I was prescient — now that I know more (much more!) about the diagnosis of dementia — so much as lucky. So much for accuracy, although I was pretty certain he was having some nature of cognitive difficulties by that time. Of course, the public exposure of a political candidate or leader, also, gives a great deal more opportunity for observation and ongoing refinement of diagnostic hypotheses than either a deceased historical personage or a private individual without public visibility.

As for the ethical concerns, I think we have to have a different, a lower, threshold for worrying about the intellectual wherewithal of any man with his finger on the nuclear trigger (or, for that matter, senior officials around him). For purposes of raising public concern, influencing people’s comfort electing someone President and Commander-in-Chief, or provoking interest in further formal examination of his mental status, I would continue today to be far more comfortable suggesting he might have a troubling medical condition than I would with a private individual where the concern was merely the treatment implications of the diagnostic hypothesis.

‘During a conversation between the two presidents, George W. Bush, 55, (USA) and Fernando Henrique Cardoso, 71, (Brazil), Bush bewildered his colleague with the question “Do you have blacks, too?” ‘ Der Spiegel [thanks, Jeff]

Local telephone companies have begun sharing customers’ calling habits with corporate affiliates, and you have to know what you’re doing to ‘opt-out’ of the arrangement. CNN

The amazing Sept. 11th $20 Bill trick [via Red Rock Eaters]

When good food goes bad:

‘More than 90% of Americans take leftovers home from a restaurant at least occasionally and 32% take home leftovers on a regular basis. However, when it comes to proper leftover storage and reheating temperatures, or determining if food is still edible, consumers “are playing a guessing game,” according to a new survey conducted by the American Dietetic Association (ADA) and the ConAgra Foods Foundation.

Among other findings, the “ADA/ConAgra Foods Home Food Safety” survey reports that (69%) of Americans are eating at restaurants at least once a week and about 57% are ordering take-out. Yet, barely 6% label and date restaurant leftovers to help them know when to throw foods out. Considering that food may spoil long before it looks, smells or tastes bad, 48% of respondents admit to relying on their senses to determine whether or not to consume leftovers, according to the survey.’ Brandweek [via Spike]

Announcement of the birth of Daniel and Mariane Pearl’s son Adam, with photo of mother and newborn. The Daniel Pearl Foundation [thanks, David]

Related: “The unedited video of journalist Daniel Pearl being murdered is back online. An Internet hosting company in Virginia, which the FBI threatened last week with federal obscenity charges, said on Monday afternoon that it would resume distribution of the horrific 4-minute video.” Wired Make sure you’re really prepared to watch this before clicking on this blink. It is an obscenity but not that kind of obscenity. Having been away for several weeks, I’m not sure — is this old hat? has everyone who wants to already in fact viewed this?

Learning About Leonardo: “…rich multilingual cultural

perspectives on the identity of Mona Lisa, …lesson plans, museum links, current articles online about the

celebration of Leonardo’s Bronze Horse in Milan, as well as a view of

the Mona Lisa Bridge now built in Oslo, Norway.

Our project presents music composed by Leonardo da Vinci, and

we’ve also identified Leonardo’s portrait of an “unknown” Musician. [via an FmH reader]

Heart of Cheapness: “In one of the oddest enterprises in the history of development economics, Bono – the lead singer for the rock band U2 – has been touring Africa with Paul O’Neill, secretary of the treasury. For a while, the latent tensions between the two men were masked by Bono’s courtesy; but on Monday he lost his cool.”  NY Times

That scar on your arm won’t help if the man next to you has smallpox: “If you had a smallpox vaccination as a child and think you’re still protected, think again. Almost everyone vaccinated before smallpox was eradicated in the mid-1970s has now lost their immunity.” EurekAlert!

Angry outbursts linked to brain dysfunction. In my work as a psychiatrist, I have paid much attention to the relatively neglected, related areas of irritability, anger dyscontrol, impulsivity and violence. In the extreme, patients with a degree of impulsive angry outbursts warranting a psychiatric diagnosis are labelled with intermittent explosive disorder. Not surprisingly, IED is associated with dysfunction of frontal lobe areas; the frontal cortex, among other things, mediates inhibition and control of impulsive behaviors.

What is interesting about this study is that patients with IED differ from controls in some other aspects of frontal lobe function, and particularly those mediated by a particular frontal subregion called the orbitomedial prefrontal cortex (OMPF) — observed to be impaired in patients with known OMPF lesions. For example, IED patients do not learn to consistently avoid making choices associated with a high degree of punishment; and they may have impaired recognition of facial expression and a tendency to overinterpret others’ emotions as negative or hostile.

The authors appear to be interested in establishing, from the similarity in neuropsychological deficits between IED and OMPF-lesioned patients, simply that the frontal region contributing to aggression is likely to be the OMPF. But I think the significance of the study is broader. It is easy to see how these other frontal deficits might be additive with impaired impulse control in causing or contributing to anger outbursts, which may thus in a sense be overdetermined neurobiologically. And even in people who have not qualified for a frank IED diagnosis, a lesser degree of similar orbitomedial dysfunction may predispose to an angry temperament.  New Scientist

Here’s the abstract of the journal article, from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Why Angry People Can’t Control the Short Fuse: ‘ “People with short fuses are often very self-righteous and unsympathetic about the effect of their anger on other people,” said Dr. (Norman) Rosenthal, author of a new book on the science of feelings, The Emotional Revolution. “Angry people don’t come into psychiatrists’ offices. They think it’s everyone else’s problem…’ NY Times

Obsessive-compulsive disorder linked to piety: “The notion that a strict, possibly even God-fearing, upbringing may contribute to obsessive-compulsive disorder has been boosted by a survey which discovered that devout Catholics were more likely to show symptoms than less religious people.” From reading the article it is not possible to determine the direction of the causal link; I think it is much more likely that people’s obsessive-compulsive predispositions may contribute to their piety. New Scientist

The men who would be McCain: “Despite high-profile recruitment by the New Republic and the Washington Monthly, John McCain has evinced no public interest in the 2004 Democratic nomination for president. But the McCain fans in the Democratic Party needn’t worry. If he doesn’t run, somebody else will run as him.” Slate

Double down: “Tom Waits released two proper records in a decade. Then he dropped two crusted with rust and riotous cacophony in one day.” Salon

Memoirs of a sexual predator: “…(Catherine) Millet was until recently known primarily as the founder/editress of a highbrow art magazine, Art Press. Evidence would suggest, however, that her mind was not always on her job.” Review of The Sexual Life of Catherine M.   Telegraph UK

Philosopher Who Challenged Postmodern Radicalism Is France’s New Education Minister: ‘(Luc) Ferry is sometimes identified as one of the “New Philosophers” — a group of young thinkers who, in the late 1970s, challenged the hold of Marxism and other radical currents on the French intelligentsia. In 1986, in a collaboration with Alain Renaut, Mr. Ferry published an influential critique of Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Pierre Bourdieu, and Jacques Lacan, treating them as manifestations of what the book’s title called “68 thought.” (The reference to the mass protests by students and workers in May 1968 is unfortunately lost in the volume’s English translation as French Philosophy of the Sixties: An Essay on Antihumanism, published by the University of Massachusetts in 1990.).’ Chronicle of Higher Education

Graying Now, McCarthyites Keep the Faith: “Appleton, Wis. — For more years than he can remember, Jerome Flemming has been coming to St. Mary Cemetery here every May for a memorial service at the grave of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy. Like others who make this pilgrimage to McCarthy’s birthplace and resting place, Mr. Flemming, 87, was both a friend to the senator and a supporter of his cold war crusade against what he called communist subversion in Washington.” NY Times

Books for Summer Reading: “This list has been selected from books reviewed since the Holiday Books issue of December 2001. The books are alphabetized under genre headings; the book titles are linked to the original reviews.” NY Times Book Review

‘Scratch an important nineteenth- or twentieth-century thinker and the chances are good that you will find a warm word or two for the work of G. C. Lichtenberg.’ G. C. Lichtenberg: a “spy on humanity”. ‘Lichtenberg once said that he would give part of his life to know what was the average barometric pressure in paradise. He never discovered that quantum, but in his aphorisms we have an extraordinary register of the barometric pressure of the human heart.

As a literary form, aphorisms have the liability of their strength. Aphorisms are insights shorn of supporting ratiocination. Sometimes they are arrived at in an instant, in a sudden illumination; sometimes, as Lichtenberg’s draftings and redraftings of the same phrase or idea reveals, they are arrived at through a process of intellectual and rhetorical honing. Bertrand Russell reports that when he told Wittgenstein that he should not simply state what he thought was true but should provide arguments, Wittgenstein replied that arguments spoil the beauty of insights and that “he would feel as if he was dirtying a flower with muddy hands.” Just so, aphorisms are the blossoms of thought. They may depend on stalk and soil, but their beauty is independent of those prerequisites.’ A 19th century herald of the weblogging spirit? Viz —

…(T)he notebooks were something else, a general repository, an intellectual clearinghouse, “a Book wherein I write everything, as I see it or as my thoughts suggests it to me.” Lichtenberg’s notebooks are a sort of omnibus. As J. P. Stern put it in Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions (1959)—the best book in English on Lichtenberg—they consist of “jottings, extracts, calculations, quotations, autobiographical observations, platitudes, witticisms, drafts as well as polished aphorisms.” Lichtenberg considered publishing at least portions of his notebooks but never did. His feelings about their value seemed to vacillate with his moods, which themselves vacillated wildly. Sometimes he referred to their contents as Pfennigs-Wahrheiten—“penny-truths”—at other times he waxed grandiloquent: “I have scattered seeds of ideas on almost every page which, if they fall on the right soil, may grow into chapters and even whole dissertations.”

…Lichtenberg’s acts of espionage on mankind were unsystematic even about being unsystematic. They were raids on the interesting, conducted as time, mood, and inspiration permitted. There is no unifying thread, though there are recurrent themes. One familiar theme is part description, part admonition: “It is almost impossible to bear the torch of truth through a crowd without singeing somebody’s beard.”

Court Overturns Law Mandating Internet Filters for Public Libraries.  NY Times

“The U.S. government has alerted airlines and law enforcement agencies that new intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists have smuggled shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles into the United States” The Washington Times

“As international attention zeroes in on weapons of mass destruction, a new security matter is brewing out of the limelight: terrorist smuggling. Already, German authorities have issued a Europe-wide alert suggesting that at least 30 “important people” from Afghanistan’s deposed Taliban regime and Al Qaeda who may have been smuggled into Europe, are said to be regrouping in Britain.” Christian Science Monitor

Public trust returning to ‘normal’ lows: “New surveys show a resurgence of public criticism of government after the 9/11 crest of support.”  Christian Science Monitor

At last, Americans are asking whether their government did enough to protect them on September 11:

“Normal service has resumed. After eight months off the air, American politics is back. Republicans are once more hurling abuse at Democrats, Democrats are slamming Republicans, while Capitol Hill and the White House have returned to their traditional posture: at loggerheads. At long last, the September 11 bubble of bipartisan consensus – in which even to question the Bush administration’s war against terrorism was seen as unpatriotic – has burst.” Guardian UK

Infiltration must end to avoid war: Powell sees a way out of crisis: ‘The secretary said he could not predict how close Pakistan and India were to war, but “what we’re trying to do is make sure they never reach that point. We are pressing President Musharraf very hard to cease all infiltration activities on the part of terrorist organizations across the Line of Control, and we are asking the Indians to show restraint until we can determine whether or not that infiltration activity has ceased”.’  Pakistan Dawn

Eminem’s Martyr Complex:

With his new album, though, that mix of social realism and hyperbole?in his hands, an original and combustible compound?has given way to the paranoid delusional. The ranting and the essaying are no longer concerned only or even mostly with the middle-school id of his alter ego, Slim Shady, or with the troubled youth of Marshall Mathers and his issues with class, race, his ex, Kim, his father, and his mother (although the album’s only knockout song, “Cleaning Out My Closet,” is a howling lament about his mom). Now it’s largely about Eminem, the pop star, who seems to have confused celebrity with political and social potency. He would have you believe?he himself wants to believe?that he has such terrifying authority among the young and restless that mainstream America has got to bring him down. Eminem’s developed a martyr complex. Slate

The peculiar duplicity of Ari Fleischer: “…(W)hat Fleischer does, for the most part, is not really spin. It’s a system of disinformation–blunter, more aggressive, and, in its own way, more impressive than spin. Much of the time Fleischer does not engage with the logic of a question at all. He simply denies its premises–or refuses to answer it on the grounds that it conflicts with a Byzantine set of rules governing what questions he deems appropriate. Fleischer has broken new ground in the dark art of flackdom: Rather than respond tendentiously to questions, he negates them altogether.” The New Republic

News from the Free Online Scholarship movement: “Putting peer-reviewed scientific and scholarly literature on the internet and making it available to readers free of charge. Removing the barriers to serious research.”

Set to bomb, Palestinian changed mind.  Philadelphia Inquirer

Liberal Reality Check: “It’s time for civil libertarians to examine themselves with the same rigor with which we are prone to examine others.

As we gather around F.B.I. headquarters sharpening our machetes and watching the buzzards circle overhead, let’s be frank: There’s a whiff of hypocrisy in the air.

One reason aggressive agents were restrained as they tried to go after Zacarias Moussaoui is that liberals like myself — and the news media caldron in which I toil and trouble — have regularly excoriated law enforcement authorities for taking shortcuts and engaging in racial profiling. As long as we’re pointing fingers, we should peer into the mirror…”

NY Times op-ed

Shortage of Nurses Hurts Patient Care, Study Finds.  NY Times

…and it is being provoked by Mr Bush”, says Robert Fisk:

So now Osama bin Laden is Hitler. And Saddam Hussein is Hitler. And George Bush is fighting the Nazis. Not since Menachem Begin fantasised to President Reagan that he felt he was attacking Hitler in Berlin – his Israeli army was actually besieging Beirut, killing thousands of civilians, “Hitler” being the pathetic Arafat – have we had to listen to claptrap like this. But the fact that we Europeans had to do so in the Bundestag on Thursday – and, for the most part, in respectful silence – was extraordinary.

I’m reminded of the Israeli columnist who, tired of the wearying invocation of the Second World War to justify yet more Israeli brutality, began an article with the words: “Mr Prime Minister, Hitler is dead.” Must we, forever, live under the shadow of a war that was fought and won before most of us were born? Do we have to live forever with living, diminutive politicians playing Churchill (Thatcher and, of course, Blair) or Roosevelt? “He’s a dictator who gassed his own people,” Mr Bush reminded us for the two thousandth time, omitting as always to mention that the Kurds whom Saddam viciously gassed were fighting for Iran and that the United States, at the time, was on Saddam’s side. Independent UK

Boomtown, U.S.A.: a portrait of the factory in McAlester, Oklahoma, where they make virtually 100% of the non-nuclear bombs in the U.S. arsenal.  Fast Company

“They were more terrifying than the al-Qaeda,” say British marines returning from an operation deep into the Afghan mountains.  The Scotsman

US plan to strike enemy with Valium: “American military chiefs are developing plans to use Valium as a potential weapon against enemy forces and to control hostile populations, according to official documents seen by The Observer.”

E-Mail Scam Cites Afghanistan Soldier. Just when I was getting comfortable waiting for my money to start rolling in from ‘the Nigerian email scam’ — these days I’m responding to two or three such opportunities I’m offered every week, all from relatives of deposed multimillionaire despots or at least oil ministers! — here comes an interesting, novel twist on the con…

Peter Erlinder, law professor and former president of the National Lawyers’ Guild, says that the Patriot Act’s supposed justification is gone and calls upon Congress for its repeal. This is the least tedious offshoot of the ‘Bush knew’ debate I’ve read yet. If the attacks should not have been ‘unexpected’ with existing intelligence practices, then the Justice Dept’s vast power grab at the expense of civil liberties to prevent future terrorist attacks is based on a lie.

How Bush is winning the war over going to war with Iraq: “…That’s how the hawks, led by President Bush, are winning the war over going to war. They’ve pushed American and global expectations so far toward military conflict that those who want to dissuade or undercut them have to shift positions in order to keep up. The middle is moving to the right.” Slate

Afghan Warlord Feared Teaming Up With Qaeda and Taliban: “Remnants of Al Qaeda and the senior leadership of the Taliban are trying to build ties to a warlord, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, with the goal of attacking American-led forces and undermining the interim government in Kabul, senior American and British military officials here said today.” Asked if the US would go after Hekmatyar, a senior military official simply reminded reporters that his commander-in-chief had said ‘that if you are supporting these organizations, you are against us’. There is evidence that the CIA had tried — and failed — to assassinate him with a missile from a pilotless drone several weeks ago. NY Times

George Will on why airline pilots should not be armed. Washington Post

A couple from Howard Kurtz: Journalists See An Alarming Trend In Terror Warnings:

“Journalists say the Bush administration has been pushing the recent spate of scary stories about possible new terrorist attacks.

“Right now they’re putting out all these warnings to change the subject from what was known prior to September 11 to what is known now,” says CBS’s national security correspondent, David Martin.” .”

Sept. 11th Blame Game Intensifying:

“It’s come to this: finger-pointing about the finger-pointing.

That is, an argument over whether the Democrats are or are not benefiting from their attacks on the White House for mishandling intelligence before Sept. 11.

Only in Washington could a debate about the most vicious terrorist attack in American history turn into partisan score-keepingWashington Post

F.B.I. Given Broader Authority to Monitor the Public

The Justice Department said today that it would immediately loosen restrictions on the F.B.I., giving the bureau broad new powers to go after terrorists without violating the United States Constitution.

Rules That Limited F.B.I. Domestic Spying Were Rooted in Earlier Era, Not in Law

Smile, you’re on candid camera — permitting the FBI to monitor the internet is one of the central features of the new rules.

With the substitution of the Internet for the newsstand, that is essentially what Attorney General John Ashcroft now proposes to allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation to do.

If the Supreme Court was unwilling to bar a similar practice in 1972, there is little reason to think a challenge would succeed today.

Indeed, the restrictions under which the F.B.I. has operated for three decades were self-imposed. Congressional pressure, lawsuits, scandals and a public outcry played a role in the bureau’s vow to limit domestic surveillance to situations in which criminal conduct was suspected. But the restrictions were not enforceable in court and were grounded in what might be called constitutional values, rather than actual law.

Civil libertarians largely acknowledge that the Justice Department is free to revise its own guidelines, but they say that the knowledge that political activity is being monitored by the government will chill the kinds of unrestrained discussions that are central to American democracy, with no appreciable benefits. NY Times

Shortlist for annual Turner Prize for art is published: “The nominees announced Thursday for the $30,000 annual award are Fiona Banner, Liam Gillick, Keith Tyson and Catherine Yass, all Britons. In keeping with the Turner Prize’s taste for the avant-garde, all are conceptual artists working with a range of unusual media. The prize has regularly been criticized for overlooking more conventional art forms. Some of the more unusual entries in recent years have included a soiled bed, a pickled cow and an elephant dung painting. This year, as in recent years, there was no painter among the finalists.” National Post

Music CD copy protections easily broken with a felt tip pen SF Chronicle

On this day of the ceremonial end to the cleanup and recovery at the World Trade Center site, I sat down with this moving, painful chronicle of the final 102 minutes of the WTC from last Sunday’s New York Times, compiled from 157 accounts from survivors and friends’ and relatives’ accounts of last phone and email contacts with those lost in the attack. I would not be surprised if this is old news for you, and if it had been blinked to by numerous other weblogs last week while I was away, but I couldn’t let it pass, brutally uncomfortable as it is to take in.

All cultures are not equal

This belief that modernism lies at the root of all evil is so pervasive that only right-wing reactionaries, like Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, former UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher or the late Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn, it sometimes seems, are willing unreservedly to defend (CLR) James’ belief in the superiority of ‘the learning and profound discoveries of Western civilisation’ [‘The Making of the Caribbean People’, in Spheres of Existence: Selected Writings (London: Alison and Busby, 1980)].

So the real question to ask in the wake of 11 September 11 is not, as many have suggested, ‘Why do they hate us?’, but rather ‘Why do we seem to hate ourselves?’. Why is it that Western liberals and radicals have become so disenchanted with modern civilisation that some even welcomed the attack on the Twin Towers as an anti-imperialist act? spiked

Contrast with this review, from The Economist. of Will Hutton’s The World We’re In:

America has become a danger to us all, according to a British bestseller. Can such a view honestly be sustained? … George Orwell said that some ideas and opinions were so foolish that you had to belong to the intelligentsia to believe them. Will Hutton is a left-wing British journalist who took time off in mid-career as a visiting fellow at Nuffield College, Oxford, to become an intellectual. On the evidence of this book, he has succeeded brilliantly in proving the wisdom of Orwell’s remark.

The reviewer holds up the following excerpt from Hutton’s discourse to prove to readers of the review that he is not exaggerating in concluding that Hutton is inane:

“This, then is contemporary America. If it is rich and entrepreneurial, it is also economically volatile, profoundly unequal and nothing like as productive as it could be…Its democracy, one of the great Enlightenment triumphs…now resembles pre-Enlightenment Europe in its dependence on money and private power. This is the orderly country whose citizens routinely shoot each other. This is where worship at church is rivalled only by worship of the shopping mall. It is becoming a land of individual strangers questing for their inner happiness because the public realm is so corrupted and depleted. It is a country that has burst its limits; an economy that is on the edge. And the whole is overshadowed by a tenacious endemic racism that is the still unresolved legacy of slavery and the civil war.”

IMHO, the reviewer is hoist on his own petard; it’s a pretty cogent thesis, if the excerpt is representative…

Senate Bill Introduced to Preserve Antibiotics: “Human health is threatened by the overuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture. Urge your Senators to support S. 2508 which will protect these vital medicines. Today, farm animals are routinely fed antibiotics for growth promotion and to compensate for crowded living conditions. Such misuse contributes to the dangerous growth of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains that cause serious illness in humans.” Center for Science in the Public Interest

Be There Now: “According to Buddhist sages of another millennium, the age of Buddha would end 1500 years after his death. That was probably never meant to be taken literally, as Buddhists are given to sliding ages inside seconds and worlds within grains of sand. But the historical Buddha died in about 486 B.C.E., so I wonder what the wise ones would have made of Internet directories listing hundreds of dharma centers teaching various streams of Buddhism all over the world, the great fame of the Dalai Lama, or the hundreds of books on Buddhism published in recent years for an eager audience.” Village Voice

A Washington DC psychiatrist and former FBI behavioral consultant argues that the President’s annual physical exam ought to include a mental health checkup.

“Historians tell us that while they were in the White House, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan all suffered from brain disorders. Not one of them appears to have been evaluated by a psychiatrist. If they were, that information was kept from the American public

(…)

My experience tells me that had Lincoln, Roosevelt or Reagan gone through a thorough modern psychiatric exam during certain periods of their presidency, their mental impairments could have been easily and clearly diagnosed, and perhaps even treated. Thanks to advances in psychiatry, we can do better. We all deserve the assurance that our highest elected official is of sound mind, as well as body.” Washington Post [via the Spike Report]

Reminds me of when, during Ronald Reagan’s 1984 reelection campaign, I was one of a group of medical interns and residents demonstrating in our white coats at a Boston campaign stop. Singled out for a radio interview about the rationale for our protest, I laid out my concerns about his mental fitness for another term and suggested that he was developing Alzheimer’s disease. Didn’t stop him from being reelected…

Big Bird and Cookie Monster to wed; thanks to the Spike Report for the link. Philadelphia Inquirer

Airport Face Scanner Failed: “Facial recognition technology tested at the Palm Beach International Airport had a dismal failure rate, according to preliminary results from a pilot program at the facility.

The system failed to correctly identify airport employees 53 percent of the time, according to test data that was obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union under Florida’s open records law.” Wired

Hot on the Contrails of Weather — meterological researchers who have long suspected that airplane contrails form large cloud banks that can substantially alter the atmosphere’s heat balance were given a unique opportunity to test the proposition when the FAA imposed a three-day ban on commercial flights after 9-11 — and found that “the American climate was indeed noticeably different” during the interval. Wired

‘Lifters’: An Idea in the Clouds: ‘Antigravitational devices developed by a computer geek could eventually change the world as we know it.

Or they may just blow a few holes into some barn roofs.

The devices are known as “lifters.” When charged with a small amount of electrical power, they levitate, apparently able to resist Earth’s gravitational forces.’ Wired

Alan Stone, distinguished Harvard psychiatrist, considers John Nash and the Hollywood romance with mental illness:

“If I were a Hollywood actor, I would be calling my agent to be on the lookout for roles in which I could play a mentally troubled character. Kathy Bates earned her Oscar playing a madwoman in Misery in 1990; the next year, Anthony Hopkins earned one for the role of cannibal Hannibal Lecter; in 1993 Holly Hunter was the mute heroine of The Piano; 1994 produced Tom Hanks as the strange but winning Forrest Gump; in 1995 there was the alcoholic Nicholas Cage of Leaving Las Vegas; Geoffrey Rush won the Best Actor award for his 1996 performance as schizoaffective pianist David Helfgott; 1997 was Jack Nicholson’s turn for doing obsessive compulsive disorder; James Coburn picked up his Oscar as the sadistic paranoid father in 1998’s Affliction; and in 1999, Michael Caine was a narcotics addict and Angelina Jolie co-starred as the sociopath of Girl, Interrupted. That’s ten Oscars in ten years and I am not counting the borderline cases like Jessica Lange who is half mad in most of her movies and has already collected two Oscars.”

Stone’s comments about the Russell Crowe portrayal (or was it the script?) capture some of the discomforts I felt with the film’s view of schizophrenia, patients with which I work every day, as well:

Life is uglier and more complicated than movies. The screenwriter did find an imaginative way to capture Nash’s claim that he cured himself with reason. There is a moment in the movie when Nash suddenly has the insight that his roommate’s niece never gets older—a logical proof that allows him to recognize that his mind has been playing tricks on him. He is a problem-solver and so he solves this problem slowly—to use his analogy—like an overweight person who sticks to a diet. The other half of his cure—the movie myth that his wife’s love rescued him—is also fiction and the emotional high point of the movie. In an imagined Nobel speech, he is shown speaking to dignitaries gathered from around the world. He explains that he has explored the physical and the metaphysical, logic and reason, but what is real is love, and he learned that from his wife. This Hollywood redemption speech puts the face of humility on Nash’s unyielding egocentricity and arrogance. It brings tears to ones eyes, even when one knows better.

Boston Review

Satire on Patsy Cline Trips Up Columnist NY Times

“Bush warns Pakistan on Kashmir incursions; he says curbing militants more critical than stopping missile tests.” Read to the end of this San Francisco Chronicle piece, which is more about his conduct during a joint press conference with President Chirac than it is about the warning to Musharraf, for ongoing coverage of what a jackass we have for a President (if you still need convincing). He’s unconvincing in attributing his cognitive difficulties this time to jetlag.

Maureen Dowd in the NY Times is also still on his case, of course. This piece echoes my discomfort at how astonishingly rapidly “fighting terrorism” has become a platitude comparable in its emptiness to “fighting Communism” during the Cold War. If your thinking is as unnuanced and cognitively inflexible as Bush’s, you need meaningless stereotypes instead of concepts.

Like Ronald Reagan, W.’s appeal is that he is an All-American who believes what he believes. And he trusted his gut to create a new dynamic with a Russian leader. But such a lack of nuance over the long term could be worrisome. As Murray Kempton said, there is “the evil of lesser evilism.” The Bushes exhibit a moral myopia, thinking anything they do must be virtuous because they see themselves as virtuous.

I would, however, quibble with Dowd’s repeated description of Bush’s reign as a “Manichaean” presidency. Although the term is often applied to anyone who sees things as all black-and-white, good-or-evil, it is only dumb luck that the President’s conceptual limitations superficially echo a sophisticated worldview (and, ironically, one that was considered an anti-Christian heresy…)

Not if but when: “All Sept. 11 did was turn a theoretical possibility into a felt danger. All it did was supply a credible cast of characters who hate us so much they would thrill to the prospect of actually doing it — and, most important in rethinking the probabilities, would be happy to die in the effort. All it did was give our nightmares legs…

The best reason for thinking it won’t happen is that it hasn’t happened yet, and that is terrible logic. The problem is not so much that we are not doing enough to prevent a terrorist from turning our atomic knowledge against us (although we are not). The problem is that there may be no such thing as ‘enough’. ”

The author comprehensively considers the risk of both the detonation of an atomic explosion and the non-explosive dispersal of radioactive matierals by terrorists. Uncharacteristically, he lapses into the first person toward the end of the article:

Fear is personal. My own — in part, because it’s the one I grew up with, the one that made me shiver through the Cuban missile crisis and ”On the Beach” — is the horrible magic of nuclear fission. A dirty bomb or an assault on a nuclear power station, ghastly as that would be, feels to me within the range of what we have survived. As the White House official I spoke with said, it’s basically Oklahoma City plus the Hart Office Building. A nuclear explosion is in a different realm of fears and would test the country in ways we can scarcely imagine.

I share this reaction; it’s the reason, as readers of FmH will recall, that I disapprove of referring to the WTC site as “ground zero,” a term whose connotations properly relate to the site of a nuclear blast. Most people have no idea how unimaginably worse a nuclear detonation in the midst of New York would have been, and we ought not use sexy linguistic hype to obscure that distinction:

As I neared the end of this assignment, I asked Matthew McKinzie, a staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, to run a computer model of a one-kiloton nuclear explosion in Times Square, half a block from my office, on a nice spring workday. By the standards of serious nuclear weaponry, one kiloton is a junk bomb, hardly worthy of respect, a fifteenth the power of the bomb over Hiroshima.

A couple of days later he e-mailed me the results, which I combined with estimates of office workers and tourist traffic in the area…

NY Times Magazine

Not if but when: “All Sept. 11 did was turn a theoretical possibility into a felt danger. All it did was supply a credible cast of characters who hate us so much they would thrill to the prospect of actually doing it — and, most important in rethinking the probabilities, would be happy to die in the effort. All it did was give our nightmares legs…

The best reason for thinking it won’t happen is that it hasn’t happened yet, and that is terrible logic. The problem is not so much that we are not doing enough to prevent a terrorist from turning our atomic knowledge against us (although we are not). The problem is that there may be no such thing as ‘enough’. ”

The author comprehensively considers the risk of both the detonation of an atomic explosion and the non-explosive dispersal of radioactive matierals by terrorists. Uncharacteristically, he lapses into the first person toward the end of the article:

Fear is personal. My own — in part, because it’s the one I grew up with, the one that made me shiver through the Cuban missile crisis and ”On the Beach” — is the horrible magic of nuclear fission. A dirty bomb or an assault on a nuclear power station, ghastly as that would be, feels to me within the range of what we have survived. As the White House official I spoke with said, it’s basically Oklahoma City plus the Hart Office Building. A nuclear explosion is in a different realm of fears and would test the country in ways we can scarcely imagine.

I share this reaction; it’s the reason, as readers of FmH will recall, that I disapprove of referring to the WTC site as “ground zero,” a term whose connotations properly relate to the site of a nuclear blast. Most people have no idea how unimaginably worse a nuclear detonation in the midst of New York would have been, and we ought not use sexy linguistic hype to obscure that distinction:

As I neared the end of this assignment, I asked Matthew McKinzie, a staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, to run a computer model of a one-kiloton nuclear explosion in Times Square, half a block from my office, on a nice spring workday. By the standards of serious nuclear weaponry, one kiloton is a junk bomb, hardly worthy of respect, a fifteenth the power of the bomb over Hiroshima.

A couple of days later he e-mailed me the results, which I combined with estimates of office workers and tourist traffic in the area…

NY Times Magazine

My family and I will be away vacationing for two weeks. Please come back and visit Follow Me Here again beginning on Memorial Day (to you non-U.S. readers: May 27th). If you need a reminder when FmH becomes active again, click on the “spy on this page” link in the sidebar.

As always, please consider supporting the other fine weblogs in the sidebar by following me there both in my absence and after my return. And don’t feel inhibited about continuing to send me interesting blinks even while I’m away. I enjoy coming back to a mailbox bursting at the seams…

Rolling Stone‘s “50 coolest records” — I own eight, I’ve never heard of the artists of six, and I disagree with, oh about half. And Rolling Stone‘s “50 uncoolest records (that we love)” — I own none of these but have to admit that in years past I had two of them on vinyl. Again I have to disagree with many of their choices — these are not uncool records you should love and covet. They’re just plain uncool…

Geov Parrish: A Quiet Revolution In Burma: “The release of Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi is

a triumph for non-violent movements everywhere.” AlterNet