Literacy crisis in college students: Essay from a professor on students who don’t read.

‘I have been teaching in small liberal arts colleges for over 15 years now, and in the past five years, it’s as though someone flipped a switch. For most of my career, I assigned around 30 pages of reading per class meeting as a baseline expectation—sometimes scaling up for purely expository readings or pulling back for more difficult texts. (No human being can read 30 pages of Hegel in one sitting, for example.) Now students are intimidated by anything over 10 pages and seem to walk away from readings of as little as 20 pages with no real understanding. Even smart and motivated students struggle to do more with written texts than extract decontextualized take-aways. Considerable class time is taken up simply establishing what happened in a story or the basic steps of an argument—skills I used to be able to take for granted.

Since this development very directly affects my ability to do my job as I understand it, I talk about it a lot. And when I talk about it with nonacademics, certain predictable responses inevitably arise, all questioning the reality of the trend I describe. Hasn’t every generation felt that the younger cohort is going to hell in a handbasket? Haven’t professors always complained that educators at earlier levels are not adequately equipping their students? And haven’t students from time immemorial skipped the readings?

The response of my fellow academics, however, reassures me that I’m not simply indulging in intergenerational grousing. Anecdotally, I have literally never met a professor who did not share my experience. Professors are also discussing the issue in academic trade publications, from a variety of perspectives. What we almost all seem to agree on is that we are facing new obstacles in structuring and delivering our courses, requiring us to ratchet down expectations in the face of a ratcheting down of preparation. Yes, there were always students who skipped the readings, but we are in new territory when even highly motivated honors students struggle to grasp the basic argument of a 20-page article. Yes, professors never feel satisfied that high school teachers have done enough, but not every generation of professors has had to deal with the fallout of No Child Left Behind and Common Core. Finally, yes, every generation thinks the younger generation is failing to make the grade—except for the current cohort of professors, who are by and large more invested in their students’ success and mental health and more responsive to student needs than any group of educators in human history. We are not complaining about our students. We are complaining about what has been taken from them….’ ( Adam Kotsko via Slate )

One thought on “Literacy crisis in college students: Essay from a professor on students who don’t read.

  1. As a former freshman comp instructor … I’m intrigued that this is only now being noticed, and wonder whether it had improved in recent decades (after all, Harry Potter made reading fashionable for a cohort of students, and the blog culture happened). Since testing on precise recall of highlighted snippets has molded US students’ learning since … the 80s? I’d look at college entrance requirements (have they de-emphasized the essay?) or at differences in online engagement in this generation. Anecdotally, the online reading and response habits are quite different for a TikTok and former Twitter user than for even a Facebook and Tumblr user, let alone a MySpace and LiveJournal user.

    Wikipedia would provide an interesting body of research data since it now has over 20 years of changes tagged by IP or registered account. However, cutting and pasting from the internet (or copying from offline sources) is removed from view where detected, and entire articles are more likely to have been removed the further back in time they were created; in addition Wikipedia by definition has worldwide participation, by people of all ages and a very wide range of levels and types of education. So it would be extremely difficult to use it to quantify changes in the incidence of copying as opposed to summarizing. (In a Wikipedia context, the types of articles created and retained also change over time, which does relate to changes in curriculum and types of reading assigned in both high schools and colleges, but again, the international and multi-generational factors, plus a distinct institutional culture, would complicate analysis.)

    Like

Thanks for commenting