Via Boing Boing: ‘At 6:35PM last night a man with his hand wrapped in a towel flagged down the police, apparently seeking help. The police thought he had a gun under the towel on his extended arm, and ordered him to drop it. At least one officer fired and hit the victim in the head, leaving him in critical condition. He was unarmed….’
Via Boing Boing: ‘In just three days 10,000 dogs will be poisoned, beaten, killed and cooked as part of Yulin, China’s annual dog-eating festival. Many of these dogs are family pets stolen from people’s homes. Although this festival is in its eighth year, protesting has never been as strong as it is this year, with close to a million #StopYulin2015 tweets leading the way. Animal rights groups around the world are working to stop this year’s canine mass murder, including many in China….’
This is a country poised to join the community of ‘civilized’ nations??
A disputatious panel at last year’s professional conference revealed the surprising state of the field (it’s as bad as you think).
My historical period, properly understood, includes yours.
What looked like a moment of failure, confusion, or ugliness in this well-known work is better seen as directions for reading the whole.
A problem you thought you could solve defines your field; you can’t imagine the field without the problem.
The only people able to understand this work properly cannot communicate that understanding to you.
Those two apparently incompatible versions of a thing are better regarded as parts of the same, larger thing.
Quantitative methods have an unexpected use.
Analytical tools developed for, and strongly associated with, a well-defined set of things in fact apply to a much larger set of things.
A public event simultaneous with, but apparently unrelated to, a famous art work in fact shaped that work’s composition or reception.
This famous thing closely resembles, and therefore responds to, that slightly earlier, less famous thing.
If you teach that old thing in this new way, your students will like it.
If you teach that old thing in this new way, your students will like you.
Before a given date, a now obscure, once omnipresent theory meant that all of culture was somehow different.
After a given date, a new technology meant that all of culture was somehow different.
The name we’ve been using for this stuff is anachronistic. Here’s a better name.
Truth-claims from our discipline cannot be properly judged without expertise that almost no one in our discipline has.
Our discipline should study its own disciplinary formation; that study proves that our discipline shouldn’t exist.
An old, prestigious thing still deserves its prestige, but for a heretofore undiscovered reason.
This feature of modern life began slightly earlier than you thought, and my single text proves it.
Please adopt my buzzword.
This author, normally seen as opposed to certain bad things, in fact supported them without realizing it.
This author, normally seen as naïve or untrained, is in fact very self-aware, and hence more like us.
That obscure, élite thing once had a popular audience.
This short text, seen rightly, reveals the contradictions of a whole culture.
A supposedly fanatical, militant movement that readers have been taught to fear makes perfect sense to those who support it.
The true meaning of a famous work can be recovered only through juxtaposition with this long obscure historical moment or artifact.
I found a very small thing in an archive, but I can relate it to a big thing.
To see what this thing meant to its first readers, you must attend meticulously to the physical contexts in which the thing first appeared.
This is why we can’t have nice things….’
What separates living things from everything else? From AI to viruses, the line is fuzzier than we might expect..’ (Aeon Video).
Via NYTimes: ‘The feminist writer Germaine Greer once declared: “Every generation has to discover Nina Simone. She is evidence that female genius is real.” This year, that just might happen for good.
Nina Simone is striking posthumous gold as the inspiration for three films and a star-studded tribute album, and she was name-dropped in John Legend’s Oscar acceptance speech for best song. This flurry comes on the heels of a decade-long resurgence: two biographies, a poetry collection, several plays, and the sampling of her signature haunting contralto by hip-hop performers including Jay Z, the Roots and, most relentlessly, Kanye West.’