Apple Offers $50 Credit for iPod Batteries

“As part of a tentative settlement announced this week, Apple agreed to give $50 vouchers and extended service warranties to as many as 2 million customers whose older iPods had batteries that needed to be replaced or didn’t fully charge.

‘I like Apple’s products. I want to own their products and have confidence they stand buy their products,’ said Westley, 45, who also owns an iMac and volumes of Apple software. ‘This settlement helps me have confidence again that if I’m going to sink a bunch of money into their stuff, they’ll do the right thing.’

The settlement applies to consumers nationwide who bought versions of the digital music player through May 2004. Last year, Apple changed its iPod and now advertises battery life of up to 12 hours for its 20-gig model.” (Yahoo! News)

Brooke & Tom’s War of the Words

“Brooke Shields has officially engaged with Tom Cruise in what is fast becoming a celebrity war of the wordz. After Cruise criticized Shields’ use of antidepressants as ‘irresponsible’ during an interview with Access Hollywood last week, Shields has suggested the leading man keep his opinions to himself.

‘Tom Cruise’s comments are irresponsible and dangerous,’ Shields said in London last week. ‘Tom should stick to saving the world from aliens and let women who are experiencing postpartum depression decide what treatment options are best for them.’

Shields recently published Down Came the Rain, a personal chronicle of her struggle with depression following the 2003 birth of her daughter, Rowan. The memoir delves into the actress’ use of Paxil as a form of treatment for her condition and is meant to inspire other women to seek help.

‘Don’t be ashamed, and don’t disregard what you are feeling,’ Shields writes in the book. ‘I recovered only because I got help.’ The actress has said she is currently in the process of weaning herself from the drug in order to try for a second child with husband Chris Henchy.

However, as a dedicated follower of s****tology, Cruise is of the belief that mind-altering medications of any kind are ‘dangerous’ and that women should treat conditions such as postpartum depression with ‘vitamins.’ Hence his stamp of disapproval on Shields’ choice to use Paxil and to discuss that choice in her memoir.

‘When you talk about postpartum, you can take people today, women, and what you do is you use vitamins. There is a hormonal thing that is going on, scientifically, you can prove that. But when you talk about emotional, chemical imbalances in people, there is no science behind that,’ the actor told Access Hollywood.” (Yahoo! News)

Certainly, Tom, there’s nothing scientific about it if you think in simplistic terms like ‘chemical imbalance’. I guess s****tology has clarified his thinking to the point that it is entirely see-through. I don’t know why I should be surprised that Cruise’s comments seem so incoherent. It takes a great deal of tolerance for illogic and cognitive dissonance to adhere to s****tology in the first place. Cruise also doesn’t seem to know much about postpartum depression. Most mental health clinicians think of it as much more akin to bipolar psychosis than simple depression. I wonder if Cruise is familiar with the not insubstantial number of cases of women who, in the throes of their postpartum delusional thinking, come close to murdering their newborns? It goes without saying that you cannot treat this with vitamins.

Why smart people defend bad ideas

“We all know someone that’s intelligent, but who occasionally defends obviously bad ideas. Why does this happen? How can smart people take up positions that defy any reasonable logic? Having spent many years working with smart people I’ve catalogued many of the ways this happens, and I have advice on what to do about it. I feel qualified to write this essay as I’m a recovering smart person myself and I’ve defended several very bad ideas.” — Scott Berkun (scottberkun.com)

It goes without saying that I am guilty as charged as well…

Pentagon delays release of May recruiting data

“The Pentagon on Wednesday postponed by more than a week the release of military recruiting figures for May, as the Army and Marine Corps struggle to attract new troops amid the Iraq war.” (Washington Post)

Many of the pundits commenting on the current recruitment situation comment somewhat fatuously that we are learning how difficult it is to fight a protracted war with an all-volunteer army. More properly, it is an issue of the difficulty of attracting volunteers to an unjust pointless war predicated entirely on Big Lies. Why is that distinction lost on them?