This New York Times editorial singles out what for me was the most outrageous moment in Bush’s debate performance. I hope the import of it was not lost on those who actually still need to use the debates to make up their minds.
“One of the uncommitted voters in the audience sensibly asked President Bush to name three mistakes he’d made in office, and what he had done to remedy the damage. Mr. Bush declined to list even one, and instead launched into an impassioned defense of the invasion of Iraq as a good idea. The president’s insistence on defending his decision to go into Iraq seemed increasingly bizarre in a week when his own investigators reported that there were no weapons of mass destruction there, and when his own secretary of defense acknowledged that there was no serious evidence of a connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.
Even worse, the president’s refusal to come up with even a minor error – apart from saying that he might have made some unspecified appointments that he now regretted – underscores his inability to respond to failure in any way except by insisting over and over again that his original decision was right.”