!['You lied, they died.' //seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2001906044.jpg' cannot be displayed]](https://i0.wp.com/seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2001906044.jpg)
Pentagon Ban on Pictures of Dead Troops Is Broken: “The Pentagon’s ban on making images of dead soldiers’ homecomings at military bases public was briefly relaxed yesterday, as hundreds of photographs of flag-draped coffins at Dover Air Force Base were released on the Internet by a Web site dedicated to combating government secrecy.
The Web site, the Memory Hole (www.thememoryhole.org), had filed a Freedom of Information Act request last year, seeking any pictures of coffins arriving from Iraq at the Dover base in Delaware, the destination for most of the bodies. The Pentagon yesterday labeled the Air Force Air Mobility Command’s decision to grant the request a mistake, but news organizations quickly used a selection of the 361 images taken by Defense Department photographers.” — New York Times.
Pentagon angered by photos from military mortuary — CNN.
Woman loses her job over coffins photo: “A military contractor has fired Tami Silicio, a Kuwait-based cargo worker whose photograph of flag-draped coffins of fallen U.S. soldiers was published in Sunday’s edition of The Seattle Times.”
“A White House spokesman… said on Friday that President Bush had seen photographs of the coffins of service members killed in Iraq arriving at Dover Air Force Base that were made public on Thursday and agreed with the Pentagon that releasing the photographs was wrong.” — New York Times
This is not a partisan issue. While the Memory Hole is certainly on the progressive end of the spectrum, Tami Silicio reportedly supported the invasion of Iraq, yet felt that honoring the war dead by having her photo published was worth risking her job. (According to the editor at The Seattle Times responsible for the decision to publish the photo — a “no-brainer” from a journalistic standpoint, he said — they had about a week’s discussion with Silicio before reaching a final decision, among other things reviewing the consequences she might suffer for her action.) Quite simply, the controversy ought to be not about the publication of the photos but about the dysadministration’s policy of not allowing publicity about the war dead. The Bush spokesperson’s argument about respecting the privacy of the grieving families is self-serving and disingenuous, no matter where you are on the political spectrum. Bush had no difficulty invading the privacy of the grieving families who lost loved ones in the WTC attack for his ad campaign, as Ted Koppel reminded us on Nightline last night [thanks, abby]. No individual family’s privacy is invaded by iconic depictions of flag-draped coffins, and families of the war dead have been grateful for the reverent way in which these powerful images have finally come to view.