Paul Krugman, on the New York Times op-ed page, reminds us that intelligence analysts protested being asked to cook the books by BushCo way back last fall; they are now vindicated, as are the military professionals who expressed doubts about whether the resources committed to the Iraqi war could manage the post-invasion circumstances. Military experts say our military strength elsewhere in the world has been weakened by the extent of our forces deployed in Iraq; that the war will seriously impact future recruiting; and that our unilateralism has already made erstwhile allies run for cover as we ask for assistance in occupied Iraq or elsewhere. The dysadministration response to those who notice that the Emperor has no clothes is to smear them. Krugman notes,

“…if we’re going to talk about aiding the enemy: By cooking intelligence to promote a war that wasn’t urgent, the administration has squandered our military strength. This provides a lot of aid and comfort to Osama bin Laden — who really did attack America — and Kim Jong Il — who really is building nukes.”

He finishes up with a kicker about the Wilson affair, concluding,

We’ve just seen how politicized, cooked intelligence can damage our national interest. Yet the Wilson affair suggests that the administration intends to continue pressuring analysts to tell it what it wants to hear.

From John Robb’s Weblog, I’m learning a little — enough to scratch my head about whether this is interesting at all — about this new class of apps that promise, as Robb describes it, to “provide a PC-based organizational system for all the digital data a person accumulates during a lifetime… (to) make sense of the gobs of information we are going to store in our 1 Tb computers in 2006…” There’s MyLifeBits, for PCs, which is from Microsoft and which Robb suggests will be seriously flawed by being inflexible and monolithic. DevonThink, so far only for OSX, is a “freeform database with a browser interface that organizes your local data by similarity” and looks pretty interesting to him. And then there’s Dashboard, about which all the recent buzz is about.

I’ll surely investigate this phenomenon further, but for now I’m dubious about their usefulness to me. Maybe I need to get the terabyte hard drive first or progress further along the continuum to benign senescent forgetfulness (in which case a terabyte-range handheld PC will be more useful to me than a desktop, of course). Robb suggests these will be great for webloggers but I suspect he doesn’t mean my style of weblogging.

As Robb asks, “what do we call this category of software” anyway? And, other than the amount of their muscle, how is it different from the heavily-indexed freeform databases (like Ask Sam) or the index-based PC explorers (like Lotus Magellan) I’ve made use of in my remote past? Here are Dashboard‘s stabs at answers to both of those questions:

The dashboard is a piece of software which performs a continous, automatic search of your personal information space to show you things in your life that are related to whatever you happen to be doing with your computer at the time.

While you read email, browse the web, write a document, or talk to your friends on IM, dashboard does its best to proactively find objects that are relevant to your current activity, and to display them in a friendly way.

We call the dashboard an “association engine.”

Part of my hesitancy is about that “friendly way”. I’d be relieved if I didn’t find it intrusive and annoying, even if my machine’s performance didn’t take a hit. I sound like the computerist version of a luddite, I realize, but I’m reminded of that old Twilight Zone episode in which the aliens arrive promising all sorts of boons to humanity. At the end, just as the world’s leaders are about to place their fate entirely in the hands of the aliens, our hero runs up breathlessly to announce that he has just finished translating the aliens’ handbook, To Serve Man. “It’s a cookbook!!” he stammers.