From reading & writing:

‘…a reaction to my reading of the news about the “American aid workers” who have escaped from the Taliban. I’m glad they were not harmed. That said, the Taliban were right about them–they were whacko Christians from Waco, Texas who were caught with video & audio tapes that could have only one purpose: to convert Afghans to Christianity… I grew up among people like this, people who believe A) that there is a literal hell & B) You are going there if you don’t accept their religious beliefs. (Remind you of certain other people in the news recently?) Missionaries have done as much damage in the world in the last 200 years as armies–indeed, they are often the thin end of the wedge, the fat end of the wedge being colonial armies of occupation. So I have no sympathy for these “young women” & even less for their sanctimonious pastor in Waco who said on NPR this evening that they “were not afraid of death” because they believed in Jesus. Last night on NPR there was a story that quoted a young Muslim man as saying that his friend, who had died while on jihad in Afghanistan, was “already in Paradise with seventy black-eyed virgins.” He hadn’t been afraid of death either, nor was the speaker, unless it was mere bravado. I don’t see much of a difference between these two world views myself. None of these people have an irony organ. How about a crack team of secular humanists for Afghanistan? Ah, that wouldn’t work either, even with irony, as we should have learned in Vietnam & Iran with our self-serving attempts at “nation building.” ‘

Magical Thinking is forthcoming poetry from reading & writing‘s Joseph Duemer. An example:



Abandoned Bluetick Bitch

Numbed with self-loathing,
we abandon the emissaries
of grace. Chained to a tree

beside the empty rental
she hollowed out a den
for herself & her young.

By the time we found her
the water they'd left her
was a couple of days gone.

When it was gone she would have
slept, not dreaming, letting the pups
nurse her sparse milk

& when the smallest died
she ate it to keep
her strength & cleanse the den,

depriving coy dogs & foxes
an expedient scent.
It's likely there were two more

before we found her.
Ribs covered by a tissue of dry skin,
she was nothing -- a shadow

on the dirt & was just able
to raise her head & take
a little water from my hand

before turning to nose
her three live pups awake.
Reader, it is true, there is

horror everywhere worse
than this & cruelty that beggars
imagination, but this

is my horror, local & particular;
these were my neighbors did this,
who, without even the excuse

of racial or religious psychosis,
committed this wrong. Who live
in this same light & shadow I live in.

Let us kill one another
with heedless abandon -- we deserve it --
but not these poor relations

whose lives are without malice
& whose motives are transparent.
Let us kill one another.

Report: Al-Qaida Had Poison Formula: ‘Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida network had a formula for making ricin, one of the deadliest known poisons, The Times newspaper reported Friday.

The Times said it found instructions for making the biological chemical ricin ? an untraceable poison that is twice as deadly as cobra venom ? in an al-Qaida safehouse in Kabul.’

Washington Post

Further into Ferlinghetti: gordon.coale was thinking about Lawrence Ferlinghetti when he noticed the snippet I used in my anniversary epistle below. So he dives in.

In observance of this site’s second birthday, I just checked in on my Bloghop account. To date, 34 people have rated me. Of those, nine think FmH either “sucks” or “hate it.” Now this may be a little like the joke in which I ask you to let me know if you don’t get this message; it’s not likely you’re still reading here. I sincerely hope not — life seems too short to waste your surfing time on something you revile. But on the other hand, there are some people who love to hate, and you fascinate me. So if you, or anyone else like you, is out there, why not write me and let me know what it is you don’t like about Follow Me Here. Is it my choice of subject matter? my manner and tone? my politics? my muddled thinking? my tortured language? my design sense? the slow load time of the page? or what? As an enticement, I’ll publish your comments here if you request me to. Use some choice adjectives…

“When I saw the dead and dying Afghani children on TV, I felt a newly recovered sense of national security. God Bless America.”

Katie Sierra, 15 (Charleston WV)

Is there going to be an America left worth defending? From the westerby report, on the occasion of govt contemplation of the revocation of Posse Comitatus:

“I cannot name a single enumerated liberty that following September 11 has not been brutally interrogated and tortured either in that sham of democracy known as Congress or by the jibbering appartchiks of the op-ed pages. There has always been a huge gulf between the promise of America and its reality, but since September 11, the already rickety bridge between the two, is being burned. If the attack on freedom continues, America will come to exist simply as a morally empty, morally indefensible land mass between two oceans. I cannot send my children to die for that.”

Now, how much can US tighten the vise?: ‘…the Soviet Union controlled many Afghan cities and much of the country for years, yet came to grief in the mountainous redoubts to which the Taliban is now retreating.

But in their glory years, the mujahideen had both the civilian population and large stocks of US weapons behind them. Today, the fighting men in the caves have neither. Their adversaries include not only US special-operations groups, but also local warlords who sense that history is no longer on the Taliban’s side.’ Christian Science Monitor

RAWA’s appeal to the UN and World community: ‘The people of Afghanistan do not accept domination of the Northern Alliance!

Now it is confirmed that the Taliban have left Kabul and the Northern Alliance has entered the city.

The world should understand that the Northern Alliance is composed of some bands who did show their real criminal and inhuman nature when they were ruling Afghanistan from 1992 to 1996.

The retreat of the terrorist Taliban from Kabul is a positive development, but entering of the rapist and looter NA in the city is nothing but a dreadful and shocking news for about 2 million residents of Kabul whose wounds of the years 1992-96 have not healed yet.’

Demanding to Be Heard: ‘Advocates for Afghanistan’s women are pushing to ensure that women’s freedoms are protected under a post-Taliban government.

…As they have seized territory across northern Afghanistan, Northern Alliance officials have announced that women would no longer be forced to live under such severe limitations. Women, they announced, are free to return to work and girls would be allowed to attend schools once more. Still, it remains unclear whether the Alliance will actively protect and ensure women’s freedoms.

Given that most women’s groups have little if any political clout, their political concerns may be largely ignored by foreign diplomats and Afghan politicians alike.’ Mother Jones

Meanwhile, Dan Hartung, at lake effect, opines:

“Signs of defeatism: The defeatists will not recognize that there were Afghans who appreciated our intervention (however self-serving it was in ultimate purpose); who will play down Afghans’ newly reacquired freedoms to play music, watch television, fly kites (a reminder: not child’s play, but a traditional Afghan sport), discard burqas, or to use a soccer stadium for soccer instead of public stonings and executions; who will not celebrate the release of the aid workers (perhaps even legitimizing the nonsense “preaching” charges, which should be offensive to anyone who believes in liberal, secular democracy); who will not recognize the dramatically changed nature of the military operations; who will emphasize that the Taliban executed a “strategic retreat”, a trap into which we are walking (always possible; if so, bring it on); who will scoff at the notion that we are pursuing al Qaeda, even as we target them ever more precisely; who will attribute our strategy to secret plans and motives; who continue to demand “evidence” even as admissions and threats emanate from the cabal.

These people are insane, and the compassionate approach should be to get them help immediately.”

I’m partly with you Dan, but, oh, at least half defeatist. You have clearly chosen sides, but keep your eyes open! Only time, not strength of fervency, will tell.

More defeatist news:

Victorious Alliance says: ‘We don’t want your peacekeepers’:

‘The victorious Northern Alliance provided a foretaste of trouble by insisting yesterday that it would take care of security in Afghanistan and that an international peacekeeping force was unnecessary.

Within the last 48 hours, the alliance has defied the US by capturing Kabul and has rejected calls from America, Britain and the United Nations to create a broad-based government that would include moderate elements of the Taliban.

The latest alliance rebuff and the re-emergence of feudal warlords in the south of the country dampened celebrations in Washington and London over the ease with which Kabul fell on Tuesday.’ Guardian UK

Massacre threat to Taleban’s foreigners:

‘Northern Alliance forces have threatened to massacre up to 6,000 foreigners fighting with the Taleban in the besieged province of Konduz.

Local fighters would be given a chance to surrender, but Alliance commanders said they had given their troops explicit orders to shoot every foreign fundamentalist ? including a handful of British Muslims ? among the enemy ranks.’ Times of London

Afghans Returning Home, Vindicated and Vengeful

:

‘Drenched with joy, shadowed by bloodlust, the self-repatriation of Iran’s huge Afghan population is under way. This border town, about 10 miles from Afghanistan, has for years been a way station for Afghans coming to Iran to work or escape persecution. Now the traffic is flowing the other way….

(Some) made clear that the war was far from over, and that it could continue on a disturbingly intimate scale. Some said they were going home to finish off the Taliban for good, and suggested that neighbors who had not sufficiently opposed the Taliban would also be called to account.

After their relatives had been killed, their property taken, their dignity assaulted, some returnees said it was impossible to simply go home and pick up their plows, pretending nothing had happened.’ NY Times [“FMHreader”, “FMHreader”]

ACLU Action Alert: Bush Administration Plans Threaten Protections Guaranteed by the Constitution — ‘Congress has already given the Administration virtually everything it asked for to fight terrorism. But in the days since a sweeping new anti-terrorism bill was signed into law, the Administration has continued to announce questionable policy after questionable policy. Congress must take action now to ensure that the President preserves the constitutionally guaranteed checks and balances that are so central to our democracy.’ One-click messaging to your Congressional delegation to oppose the military tribunals.

Feeling our way to democracy: review of philosopher Martha Nussbaum’s ‘cognitive’ theory of emotions as embodied in her Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions.

In Nussbaum’s view, our emotions are not mere inner forces that buffet us about, constantly threatening to unseat reason. They are themselves modes of responsive intelligence that express our conscious and unconscious judgments of what we value and what we believe will promote the flourishing of our lives.

All the evaluative judgments implicit in emotions, she is careful to say, connect to specific historical, social and individual life circumstances. San Francisco Chronicle

Without being Freudian, Nussbaum has an essentially psychoanalytic notion of emotion, viz. that it is essentially narrative in structure — “The understanding of any single emotion is incomplete until its narrative history is grasped and studied for the light it sheds on present response.” She also apparently makes a great case for compassion, discussed at length, dismantling conservative critiques which regard it as politically irrelevant.

Bruce Jay Friedman: Some Thoughts on Clint Eastwood and Heidegger: ‘As far as I’m concerned, he’s more alienated than the whole pack of them. I think he’s as every bit as alienated as Beckett himself; what do you think of that?’ From a witty essay that originally appeared in 1976 and now resurfaces in Friedman’s recent collection of nonfiction pieces, Even the Rhinos Were Nymphos.