Secret Nuclear Weapons Data Missing From Los Alamos Lab. As if it weren’t already bad enough, hard drives containing sensitive data had disappeared from inside locked containers which were inside a locked vault when officials went to check for them after the lab had been evacuated in the brush fires last week.

The material, stored in the vault of

the laboratory’s X Division, where

nuclear weapons are designed,

contained what officials described

as nuclear weapons data used by the

government’s Nuclear Emergency

Search Team, or NEST, which

responds to nuclear accidents and

nuclear-related threats from

terrorists. The material includes all

the data on American nuclear

weapons that the team needs to

render nuclear devices safe in

emergencies.

In addition, the missing material

included intelligence information concerning the Russian

nuclear weapons program, law enforcement officials said.

The article contains many links to older stories in the continuing saga of security leaks from the U.S. Nuclear Lab.[New York Times]

Screams haunt town. Bloodcurdling cries in a wooded area of a Quebec town prompt large scale search. Rescuers continue to hear the screams, increasing their urgency to find the source, but the cries fall silent by dawn and the searchers turn up nothing. Eventually written off as coyotes, but residents see they’ve never seen any around…

The first chapter of British philosopher Colin McGinn’s Mysterious Flame, which argues that not only do we not presently understand how consciousness arises out of the physical brain in which it is rooted, but that the intellect we have is ill-equipped to ever understand this essential mystery.

…the bond between the mind and the brain is a deep mystery. Moreover, it is an ultimate

mystery, a mystery that human intelligence will never unravel. Consciousness indubitably exists, and it is connected

to the brain in some intelligible way, but the nature of this connection necessarily eludes us. The full import of this

thesis will take some time to unfold. I am especially concerned to examine the reasons for this mystery. I am not

just throwing my hands up in despair; I am interested in uncovering the deep reasons for our bafflement and

examining the consequences of our constitutional ignorance. Socrates was concerned to show people that they

know less than they think they do. I too am concerned with the nature and source of human not-knowing; I want to

know why some things are so hard to know. What is it about consciousness that makes it so elusive to theoretical

understanding? And what is it about the knowing mind that makes it founder here?

Slate: The End of Mystery – The encroachment of science on fantasy’s last redoubts. Charles Paul Freund takes the occasion of the Church’s revealing the Third Mystery of Fatima to say that science is taking all the mystery out of life:

Comes science with its DNA and its bioarchaeology,

its mummy CAT scans, its satellite imaging, its sonar, its

computer analysis, and soon lost cities are found, dead

royalty turns out really to be dead, pretenders to be but

pretenders. The past must then reveal itself in fantasy’s

ashes.

But I say pity anyone whose mystery is so petty that it can be cast aside by the results of DNA analysis and the the like! There’s still plenty to truly, unassailably enchant us.

Not Your Average Bear. Reinhold Messner, first to climb Mt Everest solo (and without oxygen) claims to have solved the yeti mystery, determining it to be a species of bear, in a frustratingly colorless book that never explains why no one else pondering the mysteries of the abominable snowman had ever noticed the similarities before.

Who Gets to Tell a Black Story? The behind-the-scenes racial politics of the fascinating HBO miniseries The Corner, from the book by a white Baltimore reporter who says he’s colorblind, directed by the complicated and mercurial Charles Dutton, one angry African-American man who himself comes from these very corners, has been there, done that. An unflinching look at ghetto life and especially the way heroin is interwoven through its fabric, but would it be too humiliating to blacks to be that real? [New York Times]

Slate: The Myth of Russian Reform by Anne Applebaum

This is why Western newspaper analysis of Russia is so often

wrong or at least misplaced: To date, the writing about Putin’s

Cabinet and entourage has generally focused on how

well-known a given Putin appointee or adviser is in the

West—and therefore how “reformist” he is likely to be.

Russian analysts, on the other hand, focus on which particular

business clan supports the man in question (they are all men)

and whose interests he is therefore likely to favor. Likewise,

the most important political battle in Russia over the past year,

that between the interests grouped around Putin and the

interests grouped around Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov and

former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov, had nothing to do

with “Left vs. Right” or “Reform vs. Nasty,” but is better

characterized by the Leninist phrase “Who Whom?” In that

context, calling one group more or less “democratic” or

“internationalist” or “pro-Western” makes no sense.