"Terrorism Strikes the Heartland"…

…says “former liberal turned conservative” “columnist” (I think I’ll put that one in quotation marks) Cinnamon Stillwell, writing about a suicide bombing by a 21 year-old engineering student outside the packed football stadium of the University of Oklahoma on October 1. The powerful explosion killed only the bomber himself, and no one else was injured, although the power of the blast was considerable, according to onlookers.

Thanks to Seth for pointing me to this story; he shares Stillwell’s sense that officials’ rapid dismissals of the act as that of a ‘lone gunman’ with a history of mental instability smelled funny. But Stillwell draws heavily — almost exclusively — on wingnut sites who were the sole sources of conspiratorial conclusions drawn from the claims: that the bomber had a roommate of (gasp!) Pakistani descent; that he may have visited the campus Islamic Society center; that the explosive used in the bombing was the same substance so-called “shoe bomber” Richard Reid and the London Underground bombers used; and that the bomber’s apartment reportedly contained “a significant amount” of Jihadist literature (a claim which investigators have debunked… probably part of the coverup in progress, if you ask me).

Now we turn from the sublime to the ridiculous. The fact that he was a Westerner “would have come in handy for avoiding official scrutiny” — thus he must have been a terrorist — and the fact that he did not live at his fraternity house and that members of his frat did not know him as an Islamic convert somehow further suggest covert activity on his part. Similarly, the fact that these events did not attract serious mainstream press coverage suggests that there is a coverup going on. (BTW, search for ‘Joel Henry Hinrichs’ on Google News if you doubt that the issue is attracting any press coverage.) Believe it or not, he had a beard “too similar to those worn by newly observant Muslim men to be a mere coincidence”! And the fact that this occurred in the same state as the 1995 bombing of the Murragh Federal Building, by this perverse logic, suggests that both were Islamic plots.

This shrill, hysterical absurdity reminds me of nothing so much as the incident sometime last year (about which I wrote in FmH, although I cannot find the reference just now) by an alarmist and somewhat reactionary “writer” who believed she saw a group of Islamic men on her airline flight conspiring together but nobody would do anything about it! Then, as now, that was probably because there was nothing more to such fears than proof that people can see what they want to see. One of the most reprehensible aspects of reactions to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was the rush to assume that the Muslims were responsible. Incredibly, some are still holding on to that bigoted and ignorant sentiment. Stillwell’s concluding plaint is that “… if a terrorist attack in America’s heartland doesn’t jolt the country out of this fantasyland, what will?” Unfortunately, the only ‘fantasyland’ I see around here is the one she and others of similar ilk call their homeland.

Here you will find the more levelheaded Wikipedia entry on the incident.

"Terrorism Strikes the Heartland"…

…says “former liberal turned conservative” “columnist” (I think I’ll put that one in quotation marks) Cinnamon Stillwell, writing about a suicide bombing by a 21 year-old engineering student outside the packed football stadium of the University of Oklahoma on October 1. The powerful explosion killed only the bomber himself, and no one else was injured, although the power of the blast was considerable, according to onlookers.

Thanks to Seth for pointing me to this story; he shares Stillwell’s sense that officials’ rapid dismissals of the act as that of a ‘lone gunman’ with a history of mental instability smelled funny. But Stillwell draws heavily — almost exclusively — on wingnut sites who were the sole sources of conspiratorial conclusions drawn from the claims: that the bomber had a roommate of (gasp!) Pakistani descent; that he may have visited the campus Islamic Society center; that the explosive used in the bombing was the same substance so-called “shoe bomber” Richard Reid and the London Underground bombers used; and that the bomber’s apartment reportedly contained “a significant amount” of Jihadist literature (a claim which investigators have debunked… probably part of the coverup in progress, if you ask me).

Now we turn from the sublime to the ridiculous. The fact that he was a Westerner “would have come in handy for avoiding official scrutiny” — thus he must have been a terrorist — and the fact that he did not live at his fraternity house and that members of his frat did not know him as an Islamic convert somehow further suggest covert activity on his part. Similarly, the fact that these events did not attract serious mainstream press coverage suggests that there is a coverup going on. (BTW, search for ‘Joel Henry Hinrichs’ on Google News if you doubt that the issue is attracting any press coverage.) Believe it or not, he had a beard “too similar to those worn by newly observant Muslim men to be a mere coincidence”! And the fact that this occurred in the same state as the 1995 bombing of the Murragh Federal Building, by this perverse logic, suggests that both were Islamic plots.

This shrill, hysterical absurdity reminds me of nothing so much as the incident sometime last year (about which I wrote in FmH, although I cannot find the reference just now) by an alarmist and somewhat reactionary “writer” who believed she saw a group of Islamic men on her airline flight conspiring together but nobody would do anything about it! Then, as now, that was probably because there was nothing more to such fears than proof that people can see what they want to see. One of the most reprehensible aspects of reactions to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was the rush to assume that the Muslims were responsible. Incredibly, some are still holding on to that bigoted and ignorant sentiment. Stillwell’s concluding plaint is that “… if a terrorist attack in America’s heartland doesn’t jolt the country out of this fantasyland, what will?” Unfortunately, the only ‘fantasyland’ I see around here is the one she and others of similar ilk call their homeland.

Here you will find the more levelheaded Wikipedia entry on the incident.

I’m back

My family and I escaped the sodden Northeast for a week in — where else? — the Pacific Northwest. I apologize, especially to several readers who wrote in alarm and withdrawal, for not posting my customary notice that I would be gone for awhile. It won’t happen again (the radio silence, I mean…). A belated happy new year to Jewish readers, an auspicious Ramadan to any Muslims who read this, and happy Thanksgiving to Canadian ones. [If you want to be prepared, I will be travelling again for several weeks in February…]

Blogger Help : What is the "Flag" button?

If you visit a Blogspot (Blogger’s web hosting vehicle) weblog which uses the Blogger navbar at the top, you now have the ability to flag its content as objectionable. Google (recall: the Blogger parent company now) reserves the right, if they agree that the content is potentially offensive (by whatever standards they wish to apply), to place a Content Warning Page in front of the weblog and to unlist it, although its content will still be available.

Some would argue that this is censorship, while others insist that because the content is not restricted this is reasonable. On FmH, in the weblogging world and in the web in general, it has seemed to me that pointing to content assumes an inherently more and more important role in proffering information and opinion. So it is arguable that removing pointers to something becomes perilously increasingly akin to restricting speech, which seems indefensible no matter how vile the speech is.

A great reason not to host with Blogspot, it would seem. On the other hand, the demands of any other weblogging platform will probably weed out many of the mindless dolts who promulgate hate speech and vulgarity, because it is so braindead-easy to do on Blogspot.

…as it is braindead-easy for the great unwashed masses who read weblogs to react with a click on the “flag” button to anything with which they disagree. Google is going to have its hands full investigating all the spiteful would-be stool pigeons (see story below). Perversely, it actually makes me wish I had a “flag” button here on FmH. After all, from its beginnings six years ago I have said you should let me know as soon as I offend you. After Steve Baum, “I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.”

Get Out My Life

One fifth of your genes are patented. A new study in this week’s Science reveals that a full 20 percent of the human genome has been patented in the United States. Of that 20 percent of patented genes — about 4,000 in total — around 63 percent are assigned to private firms while 28 percent are held by universities. Researchers patent genes as valuable research tools, for use in diagnostic tests, or to discover and produce new drugs. In the U.S., an isolated DNA sequence is treated by the patent system like other natural chemical products, such that a sequence of DNA can be patented in exactly the same way as a new medicine purified from a plant source could be patented.” (Medical Informatics Insider)

Light Up Your Night

Gizmodo is derisive about a pair of slippers with LEDs in them, saying most people are pretty familiar with where things are in their homes and can navigate in the dark. A commenter begs to differ, saying there will be a particular market for them among New York City apartment-dwellers, to keep the cockroaches away during those trips to the bathroom when you don’t want to turn on the lights and wake up fully.

Can This Nomination Be Justified?

George Will, with welcome audacity, in the Washington Post:

“Senators beginning what ought to be a protracted and exacting scrutiny of Harriet Miers should be guided by three rules. First, it is not important that she be confirmed. Second, it might be very important that she not be. Third, the presumption — perhaps rebuttable but certainly in need of rebutting — should be that her nomination is not a defensible exercise of presidential discretion to which senatorial deference is due.”

Vaccine Prevents Most Cervical Cancer

Merck claims its immunization against human papillomavirus strains which cause cervical cancer is overwhelmingly effective (New York Times ). There are more than a quarter of a million cervical cancer deaths a year worldwide, many of them in poorer countries where women do not have access to regular Pap smears that could detect the disease earlier. If this bears up, it could be a momentous health advance — enthusiasts say it could prevent at least 70% of cervical cancer deaths — although women would still need regular screening tests. Now, going beyond questions of clinical efficacy: what is Merck going to charge for the vaccine in the Third World? Would putting in the infrastructure for regular gynecological checkups be a less costly alternative to lining the pockets of Big Pharma? Is there the political will to do so?

St. Desmond’s Day

Happy 74th birthday to the wry Desmond Tutu, who said: “When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.”

Paris revolts over morbid artwork

“An incomprehensible screed of words carved by a grief-stricken schizophrenic French farmer into his bedroom floor has become Paris’s most controversial new art exhibit.

Since the Plancher de Jeannot (Jeannot’s Floorboards) went on display last week, it has created an unprecedented stir. ‘People are terribly disturbed by it. Some feel it should not be on public view,’ said Claudine Hermabessiere, spokeswoman for the Bibliotheque Francois Mitterrand. The carving – 80 lines of text, in capital letters with no punctuation – contains references to Hitler, to Popes and to an infernal machine that controls humans.

‘The work raises painful questions about whether madness can be artistic. The people who are most upset are those who know Jeannot’s story,’ said Hermabessiere.” (Guardian.UK via null device)

The Ghost of Influenza Season Future

Also pointed to by the null device: one of the best medical webloggers, Dr. Charles, writes a doctor’s fictitious journal entry about the avian flu pandemic to come. Scroll down for some advice from one of his readers on preparing for it:

“1) It has recently been determined that most pulmonary illnesses are spread by hand contamination, not coughing or sneezing as previously believed. If you are out in public or around those who are during an outbreak, using alcohol-based hand sanitizer six times a day will reduce your chance of catching flu by 80%. If there is obvious contamination, use soap and water. Antiseptic soap is not significantly more effective than ordinary soap in this regard. Consciously force yourself not to touch your face in public until you have sanitized your hands.

2) The worst public sources for air and surface contamination are public restrooms and restaurants. Avoid them. Sanitize telephone handsets and often touched surfaces in work areas, especially doorknobs. Parts of automobile interiors can also be cleaned.

3) There are several known effective OTC anti-virals, and several more that may help. Some non-toxic metals are powerful antiseptics and can be used for decontamination, such as the calcium found in grapefruit seed extract (available in health food stores). A few drops can disinfect a quart of water. A tablespoon can also be added to a humidifier for an air and room surface disinfectant. Larger amounts could be added to a swamp cooler to help sanitize an entire house.

4) Other metals are not directly anti-viral, but inhibit viral reproduction in some circumstances. Silver and zinc in the proper form and place can have this effect in the human body. Colloidal silver in a nasal spray, for one, and Cold-Eeze brand throat lozenges for zinc. Cold-Eeze is unique in this way, as its patented form of zinc is readily uptaken into the mucous membranes, unlike most zinc supplements. With FDA approval, it can state that it lessens severity and duration of colds and flu. Perhaps it can do more.

5) Most colds and flus reproduce in the sinuses and trachea, so it is important to keep them a less friendly environment for viruses. The use of ordinary saline nasal spray to reduce large build ups of mucous removes breeding medium. NOTE: avian flu is different, in that it can reproduce in several other organs, including the liver.

6) Another newly discovered trick that may work is ordinary store-bought cranberry juice, which has been determined to inhibit cellular adhesion by several viruses, in quantity. It is unknown if it would work for avian flu, but drinking copious amounts as a possible prophalaxis should not be too much an inconvenience, if that is all you’ve got to protect yourself with.

7) There will undoubtedly be shortages of several items once an outbreak has occurred. Surgical masks, protective glasses, latex gloves, sanitary wipes and rubbing alcohol may all become scarce, so it is not unreasonable to stock up now.

8) The vaccination priority that we are used to has been changed because of the severity of this illness. Instead of giving injections to the elderly, infirm and very young, the emphasis will be on school-aged children (the largest human vector of the disease), and in outbreak areas. It would be wise to familiarize yourself with traditional quarantine measures, as they can be unexpectedly harsh. In time of an epidemic, the Health Department can be authoritarian.

9) The avian flu also has a large number of animal vectors, and until these are determined for certain, it would be wise to avoid large assemblages of animals and birds, even dogs and cats. Already, some birds have been identified that can carry the disease for great distances without immediately dying.

10) Flu vaccine takes from several days to two weeks for optimum immunity. This immunity may last perhaps six months or more in a healthy, young adult, and as little as two to three months in the elderly. A severe flu epidemic usually appears in two waves, and can last from one to two years.

11) Symptomology of avian flu so far seems to indicate that death occurs very quickly, perhaps within 72 hours, and is often from blood and fluid build-up in the lungs. Though this sounds morbid, some people may die in public and it is important not to touch the body. An incapacitated person may spew large amounts of infectious fluids about.

12) Traditionally, government has been slow to react to epidemics, often waiting too long before instituting strong restrictions on the public. However, this can be deadly serious, even if ineffective. There may be circumstances where armed guards are used, and response to public panic may be severe.”

Related: Brainblog rounds up resources for pandemic awareness.

Miers Chosen in Preparation for Bush Impeachment?

A Lawyer and a Justice: “George W. Bush is getting heat from all sides for his second Supreme Court choice. The left cries cronyism; the right fears there is no litmus test on abortion and gay rights; one cynical columnist speaks of ‘office wives tucked away in the White House;’ cartoonists ask what kind of justice is it that puts Lynndie England in jail for three years because of Abu Ghraib while her boss Donald Rumsfeld remains at large.

All these views have merit. But there is an elephant in the room that even a psychoanalyst can see: Bush is reacting to what Truthout calls the ‘tightening noose’ around the White House’s neck — George Stephanopoulos revealed on Sunday October 2 that Bush himself may have been involved in the plotting to expose Valerie Plame to the press.

By appointing his personal lawyer after appointing a Chief Justice who helped him out in the 2000 Florida election, he is ‘stacking’ the court with justices who will protect him and his colleagues at all costs. After all, Miers kept Bush from one particular jury duty which, had he served it, would have exposed his DWI arrest record before he even had a chance to cover it up. ” — Justin Frank (Huffington Post)

"I don’t think Rove will be indicted"

Ed Fitzgerald writes at unfutz:

“Fitzgerald [no relation — FmH] knows that Rove is involved, and that he probably has enough to indict him, but he figures doing so will bring the full force of the White House down on him, potentially closing down his entire effort (i.e fire him, replace him with someone more amenable, a la Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre — and without a Congress controlled by the Democrats, Bush has even more freedom to act in that manner than Nixon did).

So, if Rove’s not going to be indicted, how to utilize Rove? Unindicted co-conspirator? Could be, that might slip by without massive retaliation (real retaliation — there will still be a propaganda fusillade from the right).

In the meantime, Fitzgerald knows Rove’s in the shit, and Rove does too, so Fitzgerald figures he can use Rove to get more information to firm up his prosecution of Libby and whoever else is going to be indicted. He sends Rove a letter, tells him that his testifying doesn’t mean he’s not going to be indicted, thereby keeping the pressure on. Rove’s lawyer, presumably, also knowing his client is hip-deep in it, tells him that the one chance he’s got not to be indicted is to testify again and give Fitzgerald what he wants.”

Bush claimed God told him to invade Iraq, Afghanistan

“‘I’m driven with a mission from God.

‘God would tell me, ‘George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan’.’

‘And I did, and then God would tell me, ‘George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq…’ And I did.

”And now, again, I feel God’s words coming to me, ‘Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East.’ And by God I’m gonna do it’…'” (Yahoo! News)

//us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/afp/20051007/capt.sge.osa53.071005003621.photo00.photo.default-286x380.jpg?x=180&y=239&sig=ieCDyAUWc2V1_o5YNm5hVA--' cannot be displayed]

Harriet the meek

“It’s disturbing that the administration is trumpeting Miers’ faith as a talking point. But it’s far worse that they’re trying to sell her to women as an O’Connor replacement, while also trying to reassure the right by peddling her unthreatening ’50s femininity. Where John Roberts was pitched, even to doubtful Democrats, on his intellect and legal competence, the administration is selling Miers on her loyalty and reliability. One of those tough fem-bots around Bush ought to slap him, and tell him to stop hiding behind Miers’ skirts and come out and defend her legal accomplishments and her intellect. And if he can’t, Democrats and Republicans should unite and reject the latest example of friendship trumping talent in this increasingly scandal-fouled administration.” — Joan Walsh (salon editor-in-chief)

Howls in San Francisco and Leeds to mark the birth of Beat

//image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Books/Pix/authors/2005/10/03/ginsberg1.jpg' cannot be displayed] “This week, the birth of Beat half a century ago will be marked by twin celebrations in California and Britain, where Ginsberg became an icon for rebellious youth in the late 1950s and ’60s. Ten hours before San Francisco launches a ‘Howl at 50’ event, centred on the site of the Six Gallery where the poem made its debut, a recital and concert in Leeds will hail the lasting power of Howl.” (Guardian.UK)

The Lurker at the Threshold

//www.realestatejournal.com/images/buyingselling/20050728-corkery1.jpg' cannot be displayed]I was reminded of the ongoing allure of Danvers State Hospital, here in eastern Massachusetts where I make my home, by this story of three “would-be ghost-busters” who were arraigned today on trespassing charges after taking a video camera onto the grounds of the asylum, which opened in 1878 and closed in 1992 amidst allegations of overcrowding, abuse and neglect of its wards. At their court appearance, the chastened men each admitted their fascination with ghosts and the legends that the hospital grounds are haunted.

Danvers’ imposing Gothic architecture (it inhabits a place in the National Register of Historic Sites) is one of the most overwhelming of the grand state psychiatric hospitals in Massachusetts, the majority of which — with their monumental edifices, their sprawling grounds, and their treatment of those in the state most tortured by severe mental illness — were closed in the deinstitutionalization mania of the ’90’s from which the mentally ill of Massacusetts and their caregivers have yet to recover. (Institutionalized treatment in massive and remote asylums was supposed to be replaced by community-based outpatient supports when the institutions were closed, but the budget-makers of the state conveniently forgot about that small detail.)

Danvers State occupies a unique place in the psychogeography of this region, like a scratch you cannot reach to itch. It has its own Wikipedia entry, which mentions urban legends that former patients have come back to the closed facility in hopes of finding a place to live, become squatters, and terrorized teenage joyriders who trespass on the grounds. It sounds like a cheap horror flick. Indeed area film director Brad Anderson set his haunting 2001 horror film Session 9, which has been described as “an homage to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining, with the modern feel of The Blair Witch Project…,”.on the grounds. “It’s the scariest building in North America,” actor David Caruso, who starred in the movie, told AboutFilm.com. “It was always scary, and you could really feel the pain of the people that were at Danvers.”

A real estate developer, in what is becoming a trend at abandoned asylums throughout the continent, is planning to turn Danvers State into an upscale condo development. The developer maintains that the project will be a ‘showcase for attractive and respectful reuse.’ No doubt there will be no accommodations for those peripatetic squatter ex-patients… A group of advocates and former patients are pressuring the group to include a museum to the hospital’s history in their scheme. There are also ongoing moves for the rehabilitation of the cemeteries on the state hospital grounds, in which hundreds of institutionalized patients were buried in graves marked by their medical record numbers. After the 1992 closure of the facility, advocates accessed the archived records to identify the graves and put up headstones where possible.

I have written before in FmH about the infiltration movement and its eponymous webzine, about “going places you’re not supposed to go”. Danvers has been an object of veneration for infiltrators in the decade-plus since its closure. (The three trespassers would have done well to study the ethos and methods of serious infiltrators before their escapade, especially because Danvers State is across the street from the State Police barracks!) Here is a site on the infiltration of another venerable old Massachusetts state hospital, Metropolitan State in Belmont and Waltham, where I myself trained and later worked in the ’80’s treating patients devastatingly ill with schizophrenia, and which has been closed for more than a decade as well.

//www.realestatejournal.com/images/buyingselling/20050728-corkery2.jpg' cannot be displayed]Opacity, a site by the pseudonymous Motts, who started out being photographically interested in ‘urban ruins’ but grew increasingly fascinated with the act of exploring itself, has a photo essay about the eerie grandeur of the abandoned Danvers State as well as a number of other facilities in Massachusetts and elsewhere.

None has been as obsessed with the closed asylum as Michael Ramseur, author of the reverent website, The Castle on the Hill as well as Haunted Palace, a 260-page history of the facility and The Eye of Danvers, an 88-page art history.

Danvers is just a stone’s throw from Salem, the center of Massachusetts witchery, and interest in the asylum overflows from those preoccupied with the Witch City. Some claim that the hospital was the inspiration for H.P. Lovecraft’s Arkham Asylum, which in itself leads Goths to urge its preservation. Who knows what unmentionable horrors lie in wait in the decades to come for those who remain to be seduced by its terrifying summons?

Baring It All for Breast Cancer

Titilllating idea starts out as a joke but becomes ‘bona fide bosom buddy’ to breast cancer research:

“The Blogger Boobie-Thon began in 2002 when its founder, Robyn of Shutterblog fame, launched a campaign to bring her friend to Florida for the holidays. Thanks to a growing collection of ‘rack shots’ — pictures of breasts in various states of undress — the donations mounted quickly.

Robyn soon realized she had an effective fund-raising method on her hands. She donated to breast cancer research all monies above and beyond the cost of the plane ticket.

It’s a clever event, with a strong geek appeal. Both men and women are encouraged to submit pictures of their breasts, either bare or clothed or otherwise decorated.

Creativity counts. Many participants adorn themselves with paint, jewelry, lace, chocolate, you name it — and many work the pink-ribbon motif into the overall design.

Editors sift through the submissions, publishing the clothed breasts in the free area of the site and the bare bosoms in a special, password-protected section. To see the bare breasts, viewers must donate a minimum of $50.” (Wired News)

Eye-Popping Streaming Film Debuts

Bandwidth-intensive information can now be streamed live from remote locations, over ultra-fast optical networks, as demonstrated at this week’s iGrid conference in San Diego:

“Jaw-dropping demos abounded, promising just as much for scientists as for Hollywood.

One experiment on Tuesday featured the first-ever live, IP-based transmission of high-definition video from the bottom of the sea.

HD video cameras nearly two miles below the ocean surface and 200 miles off the Washington/Canada coastline relayed impossibly crisp live footage of sea life near 700-degree Fahrenheit volcanic thermal vents known as ‘black smokers’ on the Pacific floor.

Back at iGrid, that 20-mbps MPEG2 video stream was projected in such high resolution that close-ups of tiny, translucent tubeworms the size of quarters filled the entire wall-sized screen. It was as if the theater itself became a gigantic microscope.

During a subsequent demo session, the cameras were aimed in the opposite direction — at the scientists on board the ship above the ocean’s surface. This time, high def proved to be a little too real for comfort when powerful ocean storms pitched and rocked the research vessel Thomas Thompson. The ship’s crew were visibly woozy, but audience members more than a thousand miles away reflexively turned from the screen to avoid seasickness.” (Wired News )

‘The swagger is gone from this White House’

“There is still much to learn about Harriet E. Miers, but in naming her to the Supreme Court, President Bush revealed something about himself: that he has no appetite, at a time when he and his party are besieged by problems, for an all-out ideological fight.

Many of his most passionate supporters on the right had hoped and expected that he would make an unambiguously conservative choice to fulfill their goal of clearly altering the court’s balance, even at the cost of a bitter confirmation battle. By instead settling on a loyalist with no experience as a judge and little substantive record on abortion, affirmative action, religion and other socially divisive issues, Mr. Bush shied away from a direct confrontation with liberals and in effect asked his base on the right to trust him on this one.

The question is why.

On one level, his reasons for trying to sidestep a partisan showdown are obvious, and come down to his reluctance to invest his diminished supply of political capital in a battle over the court.

…Looked at another way, the choice is much harder to explain. In selecting Ms. Miers, Mr. Bush stepped deeper into a political thicket that had already scratched up his well-tended image of competence, the criticism that he is prone to stocking the government with cronies rather than people selected solely for their qualifications.” (New York Times )

A New Measure of Well-Being From a Happy Little Kingdom

“In 1972, concerned about the problems afflicting other developing countries that focused only on economic growth, Bhutan’s newly crowned leader, King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, decided to make his nation’s priority not its G.D.P. but its G.N.H., or gross national happiness.

Bhutan, the king said, needed to ensure that prosperity was shared across society and that it was balanced against preserving cultural traditions, protecting the environment and maintaining a responsive government. The king, now 49, has been instituting policies aimed at accomplishing these goals.” (New York Times )

The Social Logic of Ivy League Admissions

Malcolm Gladwell: “You can imagine my confusion, then, when I first met someone who had gone to Harvard... There was, first of all, that strange initial reluctance to talk about the matter of college at all—a glance downward, a shuffling of the feet, a mumbled mention of Cambridge. “Did you go to Harvard?” I would ask. I had just moved to the United States. I didn’t know the rules. An uncomfortable nod would follow. Don’t define me by my school, they seemed to be saying, which implied that their school actually could define them. And, of course, it did. Wherever there was one Harvard graduate, another lurked not far behind, ready to swap tales of late nights at the Hasty Pudding, or recount the intricacies of the college-application essay, or wonder out loud about the whereabouts of Prince So-and-So, who lived down the hall and whose family had a place in the South of France that you would not believe. In the novels they were writing, the precocious and sensitive protagonist always went to Harvard; if he was troubled, he dropped out of Harvard; in the end, he returned to Harvard to complete his senior thesis. Once, I attended a wedding of a Harvard alum in his fifties, at which the best man spoke of his college days with the groom as if neither could have accomplished anything of greater importance in the intervening thirty years. By the end, I half expected him to take off his shirt and proudly display the large crimson “H” tattooed on his chest. What is this “Harvard” of which you Americans speak so reverently?” (New Yorker)

I am amazed that, even at this point more than thirty years after I graduated, anyone would want to treat me like a Harvard alumnus (and I try to make that clear to the alumni fund solicitors!). Yes, I went there, and I do not hang my head in shame and mumble unintelligibly when anyone asks me where I went to school, although I am certainly familiar with that behavior from my own past. But I have not gone to a reunion of my class since the 10th and the tales I swap convivially are from times and places far from there. I no longer even know from what college most of those in my social circle graduated, and I keep up with those of my college-mates with whom I do not because of where they went to school but what sort of a life they have gotten for themselves since. And, it goes without saying, there are far worthier charities to which I target my charitable giving than the crucible of the ruling class.

The Origins and Common Usage of British Swear-words

“This entry discusses the etymology and application of a selection of words that, to varying degrees, can be considered vulgar or offensive. As a necessity, this entails the use of said words, and it is strongly advised that, should you find such words distressing or inappropriate, you do not read on beyond this point.” (BBC via walker)

From that introduction, you would think the article does not flinch in the face of such words. Nevertheless, a number of those discussed are asterisked out.

Dog-Waste Management

Freakonomics: “…In 1978, New York enacted its famous (and widely imitated) ‘pooper scooper’ law, and the city is plainly cleaner, poop-wise, than it was. But with a fine of just $50 for the first offense, the law doesn’t provide much financial incentive to pick up after your dog. Nor does it seem to be vigorously enforced. Let’s pretend that 99 percent of all dog owners do obey the law. That still leaves 10,000 dogs whose poop is left in public spaces each day. Over the last year, the city ticketed only 471 dog-waste violations, which suggests that the typical offender stands a roughly 1-in-8,000 chance of getting a ticket. So here’s a puzzle: why do so many people pick up after their dogs? This would seem to be a case in which social incentives – the hard glare of a passer-by and the offender’s feelings of guilt – are at least as powerful as financial and legal incentives.

If social forces get us most of the way there, how do we deal with the occasional miscreant who fails to scoop?” (New York Times Magazine)

Dubner and Levitt float a unique solution that, at first, sounds quite Rube-Goldberg-esque, but bears thinking about. Very entertaining having them as Times columnists.

The Dhimming of the West?

Thanks to walker for alerting me to this phenomenon and, more properly, to the fact that it has a name. Dhimmi is the Sharia (Islamic law) term for the status of a non-Muslim in a Muslim state. While some emphasize the official toleration of non-Muslims as a virtue of Islamic society, others focus on the restrictions that apply.

‘Dhimmis, “protected people,” are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur’an’s command that they “feel themselves subdued” (Sura 9:29).’(Lost Budgie Blog )

Some see in particular “an ongoing initiative by some Muslims to force British society to conform to Islamic standards.” Here is a website that exists solely to chronicle the supposedly stunningly rapid advancement of the “mentality of dhimmi servitude” in the West. In particular, there have been ongoing battles over the offense taken by the displays of pig-related items including toys, piggy banks and images of Winnie the Pooh’s friend Piglet.British schools have removed or restricted access to “anti-Muslim” children’s books including The Three Little Pigs, Charlotte’s Web, the Olivia and Babe series. Animal Farm, of course, offends as well. Supposedly, an employee of an Orlando, FL Muslim-owned business was fired for eating a BLT sandwich. And one commenter warns that depictions of dogs are more offensive than those of pigs..

In evaluating all this, however, we should take a hint from the fact that much of this alarm emanates from the righthand side of the weblog world, not exactly bastions of tolerance. This is in the mold of the longstanding tendency of the right to lampoon the excesses of political correctness as if they make a mockery of all of free speech and tolerance. Especially in the wake of the London bombings in the UK, one can expect an incidence of fearful misjudgments and overreactions from some British magistrates and civil authorities. String together the most egregious examples, throw in a sprinkling of US parallels, ignore all counterexamples, and you can thoroughly obscure the distinctions between toleration of Muslims in a multicultural society and encouragement of intolerant extremism. This all smacks of Dubya’s fatuous insistence that “they hate us because we are free.” Radical Islamists stand far less of a chance of bringing down Western freedoms (such as they are) than these anti-Muslim jihadists; we’re doing it for them. In general, we in the West have much more to fear from anti-Muslim totalitarianism than the ugly spectre of the Muslim kind these writers depict.

Abortion Might Outgrow Its Need for Roe v. Wade

“With the confirmation last week of John G. Roberts Jr. as chief justice of the United States, eyes turned to President Bush’s next judicial nominee, who, on a closely divided court, may determine the fate of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that recognized a woman’s right to an abortion. But such speculation overlooks a paradox in the abortion wars: while combatants focus on the law, technology is already changing the future of abortion, with or without the Supreme Court.” (New York Times )

‘Going Sane’: A Mad, Mad World

Review: “There are ‘no famously sane poets,’ writes the British psychoanalyst Adam Phillips. He might have added that there are no famously sane mathematicians, few notoriously even-keeled guitarists. On the stage of our cultural history, ‘the sane don’t have any memorable lines.’ So begins ‘Going Sane,’ Phillips’s unraveling of sanity. This book, like previous ones such as ‘On Kissing, Tickling, and Being Bored,’ brings his original and accessible readings of psychoanalytic thought to bear on some unexamined phrases of daily life. Historically, he argues, sanity has been consigned to one of two fates: it’s either been ignored because it’s not dramatic enough (Hamlet gets all the good lines), or it’s been written off by cultural critics (in a mad world, grumble malcontents from Rousseau to Foucault, only the crazy are authentic). Some of his categorical claims are inflated. Richard Ford’s Frank Bascombe and Raymond Chandler’s Philip Marlowe, for example, spring to mind as imaginatively sane literary characters. Nevertheless, his broad story of sanity’s humble position in a madness-crazed culture is persuasive. We have detailed iconographies of insanity, but few compelling definitions of sanity.” (New York Times )

Dog-Waste Management

Freakonomics: “…In 1978, New York enacted its famous (and widely imitated) ‘pooper scooper’ law, and the city is plainly cleaner, poop-wise, than it was. But with a fine of just $50 for the first offense, the law doesn’t provide much financial incentive to pick up after your dog. Nor does it seem to be vigorously enforced. Let’s pretend that 99 percent of all dog owners do obey the law. That still leaves 10,000 dogs whose poop is left in public spaces each day. Over the last year, the city ticketed only 471 dog-waste violations, which suggests that the typical offender stands a roughly 1-in-8,000 chance of getting a ticket. So here’s a puzzle: why do so many people pick up after their dogs? This would seem to be a case in which social incentives – the hard glare of a passer-by and the offender’s feelings of guilt – are at least as powerful as financial and legal incentives.

If social forces get us most of the way there, how do we deal with the occasional miscreant who fails to scoop?” (New York Times Magazine)

Dubner and Levitt float a unique solution that, at first, sounds quite Rube-Goldberg-esque, but bears thinking about. Very entertaining having them as Times columnists.

US forces ‘out of control’, says Reuters chief

“Reuters has told the US government that American forces’ conduct towards journalists in Iraq is ‘spiralling out of control’ and preventing full coverage of the war reaching the public.

The detention and accidental shootings of journalists is limiting how journalists can operate, wrote David Schlesinger, the Reuters global managing editor, in a letter to Senator John Warner, head of the armed services committee.

The Reuters news service chief referred to ‘a long parade of disturbing incidents whereby professional journalists have been killed, wrongfully detained, and/or illegally abused by US forces in Iraq’.” (Guardian.UK)

Florida: Shoot First

//us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/afp/20050929/capt.sge.moy43.290905192256.photo00.photo.default-311x380.jpg?x=282&y=345&sig=iSv7jgiHajIXxoTkMd3IMA--' cannot be displayed]
“This image obtained from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence shows a poster which the Washington-based gun control group says it will use to ‘educate’ Florida tourists and potential Florida tourists that effective 01 October 2005.” (Yahoo! News)

From the website:

“On October 1, 2005, Florida becomes a more dangerous place. That’s when the Shoot First Law goes into effect, giving the people of Florida the right to use deadly force as a first resort when they feel threatened, even in a public place. But the Shoot First doctrine isn’t just staying in Florida — it’s about to become a national disgrace.”

Serenity

New York Times reviewer writes: “It probably isn’t fair to Joss Whedon’s Serenity to say that this unassuming science-fiction adventure is superior in almost every respect to George Lucas’s aggressively more ambitious Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. But who cares about fair when there is fun to be had? Scene for scene, Serenity is more engaging and certainly better written and acted than any of Mr. Lucas’s recent screen entertainments. Mr. Whedon isn’t aiming to conquer the pop-culture universe with a branded mythology; he just wants us to hitch a ride to a galaxy far, far away and have a good time. The journey is the message, not him.”

That Famous Equation and You

“In the century since, E = mc² has become the most recognized icon of the modern scientific era. Yet for all its symbolic worth, the equation’s intimate presence in everyday life goes largely unnoticed. There is nothing you can do, not a move you can make, not a thought you can have, that doesn’t tap directly into E = mc². Einstein’s equation is constantly at work, providing an unseen hand that shapes the world into its familiar form. It’s an equation that tells of matter, energy and a remarkable bridge between them.” — Brian Greene, Columbia University mathematician and physicist (New York Times op-ed)

Liars’ brains make fibbing come naturally

“The brains of pathological liars have structural abnormalities that could make fibbing come naturally.

“Some people have an edge up on others in their ability to tell lies,” says Adrian Raine, a psychologist at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. “They are better wired for the complex computations involved in sophisticated lies.”

He found that pathological liars have on average more white matter in their prefrontal cortex, the area of the brain that is active during lying, and less grey matter than people who are not serial fibbers. White matter enables quick, complex thinking while grey matter mediates inhibitions.” (New Scientist)

If liars have more white matter (not clear if it is cause or effect), do honest people succumb more often to the various neurological diseases that involve the CNS’ white matter? It seems to me, thinking back,. that the patients I have known with multiple sclerosis were all really good people. Someone should do the research…

A Con by Any Other Name…

“With the indictment of Tom DeLay there can no longer be any doubt that with the Bush regime we are observing not a variation on politics but chronically criminal and corrupt behavior parading as ideology. This is not a movement but a mob and a disservice as much to conservatives as to progressives and moderates. The whole purpose of the Bush machine is to line its own pockets, increase its own power, and suppress any who would complain about it. For the media to treat what is happening as just another political discussion merely makes it a tool of the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the American public. It is time the press learned to distinguish clearly between a con and a concept. – Sam Smith” (The Progressive Review)

Food, Fasting and Fanaticism

A psychiatrist in Boston with whom I am fortunate to be acquainted, Ron Pies, writes about What Kafka’s “Hunger Artist” Teaches Us About Terrorists:

“Since the attacks of 9/11, a great deal has been written about fanaticism, terrorism, and religious extremism of all stripes. In an earlier essay in JMB (3), I described the terrorist mind-set in terms of three features: paradoxical narcissism, ressentiment, and schadenfreude. I argued that terrorists such as Osama bin Ladin demonstrate what Eric Hoffer called, ‘the vanity of the selfless’ (4). I further suggested that much of the animus of terrorists stems from a corrosive sense of hatred, envy, and impotent rage: what Nietzsche called ressentiment. Finally, I argued that the atypical behavior of the 9/11 terrorists just prior to the attacks–their eating out at pizza parlors and enjoying sexual favors from an ‘escort service’–represented a kind of ‘malicious joy’ (schadenfreude). I now want to link these aspects of the terrorist mind to Kafka’s ‘hunger artist’; and, much more broadly, to suggest that attitudes about food and fasting can teach us a great deal about fanaticism. And what could be more mundane–more ‘ordinary’ and ‘of this world’–than the way we feel about food?” (Journal of Mundane Behavior)

U.S. Meteorologist Says Russian Inventors Caused Hurricane Katrina

“A meteorologist in Pocatello, Idaho, claims Japanese gangsters known as the Yakuza used KGB inventions to cause Hurricane Katrina, Wireless Flash reported Thursday.

Scott Stevens says after looking at NASA satellite photos of the hurricane, he’s is convinced it was caused by electromagnetic generators from ground-based microwave transmitters.

“There is absolutely zero chance that this is natural, zero,” Villagevoice quoted Stevens as saying after Katrina’s landfall, pointing out suspiciously rectilinear shapes in the satellite-photoed hurricane clouds

The generators emit a soundwave between three and 30 megahertz and Stevens claims the Russians invented the storm-creating technology back in 1976 and sold it to others in the late 1980s.

Stevens says the clouds formed by the generators are different from normal clouds and are able to appear out of nowhere and says Katrina had many rotation points that are unusual for hurricanes.

At least 10 nations and organizations possess the technology, but Stevens suspects the Japanese Yakuza created Katrina in order to make a fortune in the futures market and to get even with the U.S. for the 1945 bombing of Hiroshima. ” (MosNews)

Anansi Boys

Neil Gaiman’s new book is out. It is set in the same universe as American Gods, in which the American ‘melting pot’ is also the melting pot for all the deprecated deities of our immigrant ancestors, living in exile and ‘retirement’ among us. Reading the blurbs about Anansi Boys, I am prepared to be disappointed and it will not leap to the head of the queue of books waiting to be read here, unlike what happens with the release of the latest book by many of my favorite authors. But then again, I was prepared to be disappointed by American Gods and didn’t buy it for a long time after its release, yet I ended up finding it an engrossing read some of whose images and conceits have stuck with me since. I am a follower of the trickster mythos (and related themes like the holy fool); perhaps Anansi Boys will please after all. Alas, I worry that Gaiman peaked with Neverwhere.

Does eating organic cause Parkinson’s Disease?

“Neurologist J. Timothy Greenamyre has shown, in animal studies published in the journals Experimental Neurology and Journal of Neuroscience in 2003, that rotenone — a pesticide often used in organic farming because it is made from natural products — is capable of inducing protein aggregation, killing dopamine–producing neurons, inhibiting cellular energy–producing organelles, and causing subsequent motor deficits.

The question arises: is organic safer, or simply a more expensive way of getting sick?” [via bookofjoe]

Related:

Cancer and Diet: the links are still unclear. “…Cancer patients, doctors say, almost always ask what to eat to reduce their chances of dying from the disease.

The diet messages are everywhere: the National Cancer Institute has an “Eat 5 to 9 a Day for Better Health” program, the numbers referring to servings of fruits and vegetables, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation has a detailed anticancer diet.

Yet despite the often adamant advice, scientists say they really do not know whether dietary changes will make a difference. And there lies a quandary for today’s medicine. It is turning out to be much more difficult than anyone expected to discover if diet affects cancer risk. Hypotheses abound, but convincing evidence remains elusive… ” (New York Times )

Reading Ed

From Ed Fitzgerald’s unfutz I learned that:

  • Michael Brown, who recently resigned as FEMA head in ignomy, has been rehired as a consultant to the organization to assess the disaster response. Ed comments, “Now, in the abstract, this is not a bad idea, making sure you get the value of an employee’s experience before they leave to go elsewhere. In this particular instance, though, one has to think What experience? ” If I am not mistaken, this is what is usually called a ‘golden parachute.’ However, in this case, it is not gold but excrement-brown.
  • The bus which caught fire killing twenty-three nursing home evacuees during the Houston evacuation was from a company which had had numerous difficulties with regulatory authorities in Texas and, according to a whistle blower, more serious problems with meintenance of its vehicles. “The bus, run by Global Limo of McAllen, Texas, was taken out of service in July after its registration expired. It was allowed back on the road because of a waiver signed last week by Gov. Rick Perry intended to make available as many commercial vehicles as possible for the hurricane evacuation.” Ed places this rightly in the broader context of Republican officials’ eagerness to set aside regulatory restrictions on business at any opportunity, which may be a bit of a reach here.

Pentagon-developed killer dolphins may be loose in Gulf of Mexico after Katrina

“It may be the oddest tale to emerge from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Armed dolphins, trained by the US military to shoot terrorists and pinpoint spies underwater, may be missing in the Gulf of Mexico.

Experts who have studied the US navy’s cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying ‘toxic dart’ guns. Divers and surfers risk attack, they claim, from a species considered to be among the planet’s smartest. The US navy admits it has been training dolphins for military purposes, but has refused to confirm that any are missing.” (Guardian/Observer.UK)

Bush plea for cash to rebuild Iraq raises $600

“An extraordinary appeal to Americans from the Bush administration for money to help pay for the reconstruction of Iraq has raised only $600 (£337), The Observer has learnt…

…It is understood to be the first time that a US government has made an appeal to taxpayers for foreign aid money. Contributors have no way of knowing who will receive their donations or even where they may go, after officials said details had be kept secret for security reasons.

USaid’s Heather Layman denied it was disappointed with the meagre sum raised after a fortnight. ‘Every little helps,’ she said.” (Guardian/Observer.UK)

The myth of Iraq’s foreign fighters

“The US and Iraqi governments have vastly overstated the number of foreign fighters in Iraq, and most of them don’t come from Saudi Arabia, according to a new report from the Washington-based Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS). According to a piece in The Guardian, this means the US and Iraq ‘feed the myth’ that foreign fighters are the backbone of the insurgency. While the foreign fighters may stoke the insurgency flames, they make up only about 4 to 10 percent of the estimated 30,000 insurgents.” (Christian science Monitor)

Who’re you gonna believe, the BBC??

Hurricanes and global warming – a link?: “The latest to succumb was the British newspaper The Independent, which screamed on its front page: ‘This is global warming’, above an alarmingly portentous graphic of Hurricane Rita’s projected path.

But is it global warming? What is the evidence that the growing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are changing weather systems in such a way that hurricanes become more powerful, or more frequent?” (BBC)

There have been 270% the average number of intense storms expected by this date in the hurricane season, but it is certainly rash to draw conclusions from a given year. The formation of tropical storms over the Atlantic runs in phases, and we are in the midst of a several-decade active phase. However, we are almost certainly seeing an effect, from the warming of the average surface water temperature in the Gulf of Mexico, on the storms that cross the Gulf.

At ABBA, Go Left to SpongeBob

The robotic exploration of Mars is coming up with so many features to name that scientists go wild:

“Like European explorers who named the New World after their homes in the Old, the Mars scientists have filled the strange landscape of the Red Planet with a mishmash of modern life on Earth.

The twin rover missions have forced scientists to come up with more than 4,000 names to mark everything from the majestic Columbia Hills to a few pebbles in the sand.

The result is an extravagantly labeled map punctuated by the scientists’ ever-changing preoccupations with history, holidays, monkeys, ice cream, cartoon characters, sushi, Mayan words, Scandinavian fish delicacies … the list goes on and on.

It hasn’t been easy.

Sometimes a rock gets named twice. Sometimes the names run afoul of the official naming protocol. Sometimes a team member doesn’t like the theme for an area.

And sometimes team members get desperate.” (Yahoo! News)

‘Of all the nightmares during Hurricane Katrina, this must be one of the worst…"

Human Rights Watch: New Orleans Prisoners Abandoned to Floodwaters: “As Hurricane Katrina began pounding New Orleans, the sheriff’s department abandoned hundreds of inmates imprisoned in the city’s jail, Human Rights Watch said today.

Inmates in Templeman III, one of several buildings in the Orleans Parish Prison compound, reported that as of Monday, August 29, there were no correctional officers in the building, which held more than 600 inmates. These inmates, including some who were locked in ground-floor cells, were not evacuated until Thursday, September 1, four days after flood waters in the jail had reached chest-level.

“Of all the nightmares during Hurricane Katrina, this must be one of the worst,” said Corinne Carey, researcher from Human Rights Watch. “Prisoners were abandoned in their cells without food or water for days as floodwaters rose toward the ceiling.” “

R.I.P. Serge Lang

Gadfly and Mathematical Theorist Dies at 78: “Serge Lang, a leading mathematical theorist who became better known for his academic jousts with nonmathematicians on social and political issues than for his work in geometry and the properties of numbers, died Sept. 12 in Berkeley, Calif. He was 78.

…Throughout his life, Dr. Lang railed against inaccuracy and imprecision and felt that the scientific establishment unfairly suppressed dissident ideas. Beginning around 1977, he adopted a more activist approach, writing letters and articles – sometimes even buying newspaper advertisements – to challenge research that he considered unscrupulous or sloppy. He would pull together his writings and add news articles, Congressional testimony and other documents into what he called files and mail the compiled documents to scientists, journalists and government officials.” (New York Times )

This Band Was Your Band, This Band Is My Band

The New York Times writes about all the old dinosaur bands resurrecting themselves with new lead singers these days. The focus of the article seems to be whether, with such a profound change, a band is justified in continuing under the same name. The more profound issue is why so few acts let themselves die a dignified death anymore. One needs to wonder what it is about rock musicianship that prevents members of dinosaur bands from ever evolving any new chops and moving on and what it is about rock consumers’ sensibilities that encourages the musicians to do the same old things over and over again ad nauseum. And why in the world the New York TImes covers the phenomenon in an equally shallow manner.

In Plans to Evacuate U.S. Cities, Chance for Havoc

“The chaotic evacuations of New Orleans and Houston have prompted local officials across the country to take another look at plans for emptying their cities in response to a large-scale natural disaster or a terrorist attack. What they have found is not wholly reassuring.(New York Times )

The absurdity of the fact that there was no provision to ensure gasoline supplies to motorists along the clogged evacuation routes was just the tip of the iceberg. It is not a matter of individuals’ panic or ill-will but partly the lack of centralized planning and partly just the nature of things. Large cities are located at unique geographic points — that is why their precursor settlements were sited there in the first place — which often translate into bottlenecks even in a normal rush hour, not to mention a mass evacuation.

Prepearedness is not the issue. In fact, if anything, it appears to me that part of the problem in the Texas evacuation resulted from overpreparedness. Not only was there several days’ notice of where Rita was headed and approximately how strong it would be but people were more obedient than they would otherwise be to directives to evacuate because of the memory of Katrina. In most of the disasters that will call for mass evacuation, even with disaster authorites operating effectively, that combination of circumstances is not likely to recur.

At ABBA, Go Left to SpongeBob

The robotic exploration of Mars is coming up with so many features to name that scientists go wild:

“Like European explorers who named the New World after their homes in the Old, the Mars scientists have filled the strange landscape of the Red Planet with a mishmash of modern life on Earth.

The twin rover missions have forced scientists to come up with more than 4,000 names to mark everything from the majestic Columbia Hills to a few pebbles in the sand.

The result is an extravagantly labeled map punctuated by the scientists’ ever-changing preoccupations with history, holidays, monkeys, ice cream, cartoon characters, sushi, Mayan words, Scandinavian fish delicacies … the list goes on and on.

It hasn’t been easy.

Sometimes a rock gets named twice. Sometimes the names run afoul of the official naming protocol. Sometimes a team member doesn’t like the theme for an area.

And sometimes team members get desperate.” (Yahoo! News)

Not so fast:

Why Your Doctor is a Skeptic: “Perhaps this has happened to you: There’s a news report in the paper about a new drug that sounds great, seems safe, works well and is intended for symptoms you have, such as arthritis, heartburn or allergies. At your next doctor’s visit, you bring in the article, fully expecting to get a prescription for it.

Not so fast. Your doctor raises one eyebrow and seems unimpressed and begins a speech that sounds like it’s been delivered many times before, about why that drug isn’t for you, how an older, generic medicine might work just as well, or how you really don’t need a medication at all. And so you wonder: Are you getting the latest and best treatment? Why was your doctor reluctant to prescribe the medicine?” [via Shrinkette]

Of course, this essay appears at the website of a health insurance company, which has a vested interest in consumers not being prescribed the latest (and most expensive) new medications. But I largely agree, and I both regularly educate my patients and have written here at FmH in the past about the opposite trend, prescribers whose only source of information about the medications they prescribe is the manufacturers who profit from their use, and the questions you should ask your prescriber when s/he proposes a change to a newer medication because it is supposedly “better.”

I sit on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee of my hospital, where decisions about what medications the hospital will have in its formulary are made. This week, we discussed in exasperation the growing pressure from patients and families who demand to be treated with a new asthma medication they have seen advertised on television, which is 7-10 times more expensive than the standard of care, and according to the scientific literature is no more effective and no more tolerable. It is not only credulous doctors you have to worry about, but consumer-driven prescribing pressures.

People should be aware of one particular pharmaceutical industry scam which is increasingly widespread and insidious. Many medicinal copmounds have molecules with chirality, i.e. they are asymmetrical and thus exist in several different isomers which differ only in which way the bonds within the molecules twist. Often, the different isomers differ in biological activity. Thus, for example, 20 mg. of an antidepressant might contain around 10 mg of the leftward-twisting (levo- or L-, also referred to as S-) version of the molecule and around 10 mg of the dextro- or D-isomer. One of them is biologically active and the other is essentially an inert ingredient. So a company figures out how to efficiently separate the two isomers and patentsa a new medication consisting of one of the stereospecific forms. It is easy to see that 10 mg of the new medication is for all intents and purposes equivalent to 20 mg of the old one (and will probably be a pill of about the same size, by the way!), yet it will be marketed as new and improved, as more effective or more side-effect-free. It obviously sounds like a more powerful drug to a lay person, because 10 mg does what it took 20 mg of the old drug to do. And it costs some multiple of the cost of the old drug, as well as being protected by patent rights for many more years while the older drug enters the public domain where generic versions can be offered. One example of this is the antidepressant Lexapro, which is escitalopram (“S-citalopram”), the S-isomer of citalopram, which is the older antidepressant Celexa. Lexapro has been around for a few years now and is shaping up to have no advantages over Celexa, except in profit margin to the manufacturer.

It seems to me that the trend of capturing and maintaining market share with stereoisomeric forms of older medications is all the rage in Big Pharma these days; in fact, that is the case with the asthma medication we discussed in P&T this week. And I am sure we should believe the manufacturers’ claims in some instances that the ‘inert’ ingredient in the mixed version was not inert at all, but contributed to side effects or changes in the metabolism of the drug in comparison to the stereospecific form. But the literature, when you can get an unbiased study not paid for by the interested industry party, often says otherwise.

So…not so fast.

PS: the P&T committee voted to add the new asthma medication because the pulmonologists swear they would not be able to handle the P.R. fallout from not meeting patient requests for it, and don’t have the time or the inclination to better educate the public about its lack of advantages over the older medication it is meant to supplant. Supposedly, patients will have to jump through hoops, such as nonresponse to other measures and prior approval by a ‘gatekeeper’ specialist, to get the new drug. We’ll see how firm and how long the gates stand…

Mike S. Adams: How I cured adult ADHD

“One of the toughest things about being a teacher is dealing with all the latest “syndromes” in our culture of victimization. Whenever a real problem like racism diminishes, there is always someone willing to redefine the problem to help maintain the population of “disadvantaged” Americans. This is usually followed by the invention of a new problem that actually increases the population of “disadvantaged” Americans. Consequently, victimization has become a growth industry that supplies more jobs for social workers despite their increasing irrelevance in relation to the real problems of modern society.

Often those fictional problems take the form of “disorders” like adult ADHD. I always know which of my students have been told that they suffer from adult ADHD. They are often late and sometimes leave class early to go potty, unlike most students who go potty before class begins. They blurt out the answers to my questions constantly – always without the courtesy of a raised hand. And, usually, they fall asleep in class (probably from exhaustion) after the fifteenth or twentieth interruption. Later, they are awakened by the cell phone they forgot to turn off before arriving in class.

After being diagnosed with ADHD, two things usually happen to the newly “disadvantaged” student. First, a psychologist tells the victim that he cannot pay attention nor control various impulses. Next, he is given a dosage of drugs. Neither one of these responses actually works. In fact, telling him that he cannot pay attention – rather than that he simply does not pay attention – usually reinforces the problem. The drugs don’t work because, again, the disorder is fictional.

But, fortunately, I have discovered a cure for students with this so-called disorder, which I am now sharing (free of charge, mind you) with my readers. Here’s how it works.

(…)

Psychiatrists, psychologists, sociologists, and social workers around the world will surely be angry with this present column – largely because it provides a rather simple solution to a rather simple problem. They will no doubt also be angry over my seemingly calloused attitude towards those who suffer from adult ADHD. But I choose not to pay attention to them – remember, paying attention is a choice for adults – until they answer a few simple questions. For example:

1. Why did my solution work so immediately and so effectively after, presumably, years of therapy and drug prescriptions failed?

2. Will you continue to use the term “irresistible impulse” to describe what is obviously merely an impulse not resisted?

3. Are you at all concerned that other fictional disorders will be exposed by other equally simple experiments?

4. How can one be a part of a helping profession, if he does not, first and foremost, help people to help themselves?

5. And, finally, what will happen if you ever win your war upon free will? Will you protect people from the prospect of failure? Or will you deprive people of the prospect of success? “

Shark Repellent Wet Suit Shocks and Awes

“Finally, now I can swim in shark-infested waters like I’ve always wanted. A bright fellow called Vladimir Vlad has filed a patent for a shark-repellent wet suit that creates an electrical field. The idea is that sharks have sensitive receptors in their noses which would normally help them track prey, but when faced with an especially strong electrical field, they will back off. This wet suit would be made of metal and neoprene, with thin piezoelectric ceramic fibres woven in. Voltage is then delivered by the fibres depending on their length. The suit continually generates several volts which flow through the water, and the faster you swim, the higher the voltage…” (Gizmodo)

UN urges N. Korea to keep taking aid for children

North Korean Deputy Foreign Minister announces N. Korea will stop accepting food aid at the end of this year, both because its food production has increased adn because the US is politicizing the process by linking aid to human rights issues. UN Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland asserts that 7% of North Korea’s population of 22.5 million are starving and 37% chronically malnourished. “According to U.N. statistics, 40 percent of North Korea’s children suffer from stunted growth, 20 percent are underweight for their age and 8 percent are wasted, meaning their weight is too low for their height. The average boy of 7 is 7 inches shorter and 20 pounds (9 kgs) lighter than the average 7-year-old in South Korea, the world body said.” (Yahoo! News)

It’s Worse Than You Think Under the Republicans

False claims about poverty abound in the media, and RNC tTalking points are to blame for the distortion: “…CNN contributor Joe Watkins and Fox News host Bill O’Reilly both made false comparisons of the poverty rates under President Clinton and President Bush. Since then, similar false claims about poverty have appeared in other news outlets.

The Washington Post claimed in an editorial that ‘Since 1999, the rate has been edging steadily, and disturbingly, upward.’ After Media Matters pointed out that, in fact, the poverty rate declined from 1999 to 2000 (as it went down every year of the Clinton administration) before increasing from 2000 to 2001 (and every year of the Bush presidency), the Post corrected its error. Media Research Center president L. Brent Bozell III used his nationally syndicated column to dismiss as ‘comical’ Clinton’s claim that his administration ‘moved 100 times as many people out of poverty in eight years as had been moved out in the previous 12 years.’ In fact, Clinton was understating the disparity, as Media Matters noted: ‘The presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush actually saw a dramatic net increase in the number of impoverished Americans, whereas Clinton’s presidency witnessed an even more dramatic net decrease.’

Fox News contributor and former Clinton adviser Dick Morris also got in on the act. On Fox News host Sean Hannity’s nationally syndicated radio show, Morris made the highly misleading claim that the U.S. poverty rate is ‘two points lower than when he [Clinton] took office, and it’s lower in the midpoint of Bush’s term than it was at the midpoint of his [Clinton’s] term.’ That may be true, but Morris ignored the more important trend that poverty declined every year of Clinton’s presidency and has risen every year of Bush’s.

So where did this flood of misinformation about the Clinton and Bush records on poverty come from? Is it just an odd coincidence? Or is it a result of the recently revealed daily conference calls and emails through which the Republican National Committee gives marching orders to ‘about 80 pundits, GOP-leaning radio and TV hosts, and newsmakers’?” (Media Matters)

FDA Commissioner Quits Unexpectedly

“FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford, D.V.M., resigned unexpectedly today. No formal reason was given immediately, but Dr. Crawford reportedly told his staff it was time to step aside.

Dr. Crawford was in the midst of a major controversy over the FDA’s repeated delays in making a decision on an application to approve the morning-after pill, Plan B, as an over-the-counter drug.

The delays finally led to the resignation of the FDA’s women’s health chief. Just this week, the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, in a Perspective called A Sad Day for Science at the FDA, wrote that ‘this decision — or nondecision — deserves serious scrutiny, since it appears to reflect political meddling in the drug-approval process.'” (Medpage Today)

You know, of course, that the letters after his name stand for “Doctor of Veterinary Medicine.” And FDA stands for “Food and Drug Administration.” That’s human food and drugs. He was as qualified for his position as, say, Michael Brown, in case you were wondering wehther there is a pattern here.

War Bonds

A modest proposal to finance Iraq and New Orleans efforts; an alternative to Bush’s psychotic “faith-based” accounting: “I like the idea of bringing back ‘bonds similar to World War II’s Liberty Bonds,’ but I wouldn’t use them to pay for the Katrina rebuilding. I’d use the war bonds to pay for the war. The war in Iraq has, coincidentally, cost about $200 billion so far. Where is that money coming from? According to the president, it’s more magic money — spent without offsetting spending cuts or tax increases.

I have little hope that our no-responsibility/no-accountability government is capable of launching (or administering) a 21st-century war bonds program. But that’s not the only problem.

I’m not sure the public could handle it either.

This is, after all, the same American public that thinks ‘support for the troops’ entails nothing more than putting a yellow-ribbon magnet on your car. These people can’t even make the kind of long-term commitment involved in an adhesive bumper-sticker. Magnets don’t jeopardize your paint job. And magnets can be easily removed should the political winds shift.

…If you’re not enlisted in America’s military, you’re not involved in the war in Iraq. You have neither the obligation, nor the opportunity to contribute to or sacrifice for the war effort. And your president insists that this is the way it should be.

The American public does not today have the character to support a new war bonds effort. (We don’t have the savings, either, since most of us are in debt up to our eyeballs. Our national savings rate is negative — and likely headed down once the housing bubble bursts. But bracket that for now.)

So here’s a modest proposal for a remedial first step: Have the USO start selling “official” versions of those @#&$ “Support the Troops” magnets. Full-sized ones would cost, say, $500. Smaller ones would cost $100. Whenever you spotted someone with one of the unofficial magnets, you’d be justified — even obliged — to mock them as a freeloading, fair-weather patriot until finally they were shamed into putting their money where their tailpipe is. ” (slacktivist via making light)

Could humans tackle hurricanes?

“Tackling hurricanes before they make landfall by calming them down or steering them off course may be a good way to prevent a storm striking a city. Experts are working on numerous ways to do this but it may take some time – and it has never been done before. Hurricanes are fuelled by the warm waters they pass over. So hurricane mitigation strategies all focus on depriving hurricanes of this fuel.” (New Scientist)

An Ounce of Anthrax Prevention

“Why did Leahy decide to vote for Roberts? Maybe it has something to do with the fact that the person(s) who mailed weapons-grade anthrax to him and fellow Democratic senator Daschle in 2001 were never identified.

The curious lack of a perpetrator in the anthrax mailings — mailed exclusively to Democratic senators in powerful positions — is in some ways even more alarming than the fact that the same administration also managed not to catch Osama bin Laden. ” (skimble)

Scroll down the page abit further and you will also see a photo of a morgue full of Katrina victims’ corpses wickedly labelled “Bush’s Vacation Photo Album”, by the way. I love it.

Should Mike Steal the Ticket?

Do the Right Thing: “In a world of religious wars, genocide, and terrorism, no one is naive enough to think that all moral beliefs are universal. But beneath such diversity, can we discern a common core—a distinct, universal, maybe even innate “moral sense” in our human nature?” (Boston Review)

AI Naming Advice

“Find the perfect name for your business or product: Think all the quality domains are taken? Far from it – creativity produces quality results.

Let us know what you’re looking for in a name. Complete as much as you like of the form below, in any combination – no choice excludes another.

We’ll find the best available domains – all dot coms with no hyphens or numbers. We are experts at finding short, brandable names, business names, dictionary words, descriptive names, misspellings and more. We do NOT just combine keywords – as you can see from our For Sale domains and those RECENTLY FOUND.”

NPR’s "Extremists"

In a story on NPR’s Morning Edition on 9/15, reporter Cory Flintoff noted that “some extremist groups say (the July 7 London subway bombings) were a response to the U.S. and British military presence in Iraq.” NPR has repeatedly featured Tony Blair’s characterization of such reasoning as “obscene.” Now, FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting is asking you to complain to NPR about the patently absurd suggestion that you would have to be an extremist to believe there was a link between the bombings and British participation in the Iraqi invasion. In fact, a majority of the public in the U.S. and the U.K. see the link, as well as a number of respected foreign affairs analysts. The extremist position, in reality, is that of Blair and Flintoff…

New Vatican Rule Said to Bar Gays as New Priests

This is how the Nazi Pope thinks the Church can rebound from the clergy abuse scandal (New York Times ). In reality, of course, this will simply drive gay clergy deeper into the closet (if they were ever out), which will increase the prevalence of exploitative illicit solutions to sexual repression. At least, so far, there will not be a witchhunt for gays already wearing the cloth. While the Church insists this does not represent a change in doctrinal position, it is clearly a move from policing behaviors to thoughts and feelings. In explaining why those entering the priesthood will be targeted, a spokesman explains it is because of the unique temptation posed by the seminaries, even for those who are celibate, because one is surrounded exclusively by men. (So here’s an idea; solve the problem by admitting women to the priesthood…)

Murder, They Wrote

“On Monday, the Washington Post’s Metro section reported on two murders that had occurred the previous Saturday night in the District. The victims were about the same age—34 and 32. They were killed at around the same time—10:45 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. They were both shot to death.

The differences: One was white; the other was black. One was killed in a long-since-gentrified neighborhood in Northwest, the other in a long-depressed section of Southeast.

Guess which crime got more ink in the Post.

…At the Post, there’s a longstanding news formula for deciding why one murder story merits 18 times the coverage of another…” (Washington City Paper)

…and it is not as simple as the race of the victim. [read on]

It is Hard Not to Gloat…

…when even The American Spectator has That Sinking Feeling:

“…(A)t this stage of the game, barring some imaginative political moves that bear some resemblance to the Bush Administration circa 2002, Republicans on Capitol Hill and even some longtime Bush team members in various Cabinet level departments say this Administration is done for.

‘You run down the list of things we thought we could accomplish and you have to wonder what we thought we were thinking,’ says a Bush Administration member who joined on in 2001. ‘You get the impression that we’re more than listless. We’re sunk.'”

Related:

Bush-Bashing in Aspen

Robert Novak breaks the code of silence: “For two full days, George W. Bush was bashed. He was taken to task on his handling of stem cell research, population control, the Iraq war and, especially, Hurricane Katrina. The critics were no left-wing bloggers. They were rich, mainly Republican and presumably Bush voters in the last two presidential elections.

The Bush-bashing occurred last weekend at the annual Aspen conference sponsored by the New York investment firm Forstmann Little & Co. Over 200 invited guests, mostly prestigious, arrived Thursday night (many by private aircraft) and stayed until Sunday morning for more than golf, hikes and gourmet meals. They faithfully attended the discussions presided over by PBS’s Charlie Rose on such serious subjects as ‘global poverty and human rights’ and ‘the ‘new’ world economy.’ The connecting link was hostility to President Bush.” (townhall.com )

Happy Equinox

“The Witches’ Thanksgiving and the second harvest. Day and night are of equal length, looking forward to the days’ shortening. The Autumn Equinox is the time of the descent of the Goddess into the Underworld. We also bid farewell to the Harvest Lord who was slain at Lammas. Welsh legend brings us the story of Mabon, who dwells, a happy captive, in Modron’s magickal Otherworld — his mother’s womb. Only in this way can he be reborn.”

Twenty-Five Macarthur Fellowship Recipients Announced

This Year’s ‘Genius Awards’ Reach Into Unusual Fields: “The 11 women and 14 men selected for their creativity and originality range in age from 33 to 66 and also include a violinmaker, a molecular biologist, a sculptor and a laser physicist. All the winners, known as fellows, receive annual checks for $100,000 for the next five years, no strings attached.” (New York Times )

The article lists all twenty-five recipients and their accomplishments.

Related:

It Isn’t Easy Being a Genius: “Let me begin by making something very clear: I’m not a genius. Tomorrow, 25 people are going to find themselves making similar protestations – at least most of them are – after the MacArthur Foundation announces its latest class of fellows for its so-called genius award. And as someone who once received one of those awards, here’s a little insight into what the new fellows experienced over the last few days and what they’re going to have to deal with.” — Jim Collins (New York Times op-ed; thanks, abby)

Are the Macarthurs controversial at all in any quarters? I mean, for example, has anyone seen any anti-elitist or anti-intellectual backlash anywhere in the media about them, or are the award-winners just celebrated unambivalently?

Addendum: I found this critique of the Macarthur approach. (marginal Revolution)

Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia

Abstract:

Background The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.

Methods A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.

Results Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.

Conclusions The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.” (New England Journal of Medicine via Paul)

One weblog commentator summarizes it thus:

“…the somewhat surprising result that the 2nd generation antipsychotics are only marginally better than the 1st generatio—or rather we should say that they suck marginally less. As someone who hasn’t been following this field, what’s surprising is how high the discontinuation rate: 74% overall and 64% for the best drug tested: olanzapine. Basically, if you’re schizophrenic, the options are not good.” (Educated Guesswork )

Treating psychotic illnesses, especially schizophrenia, has been an important part of my career, so I have alot of thoughts about this. I hasten to add that I haven’t yet read the article, just the abstract, so some of my questions might otherwise have been answered. It is not clear how the pts. were recruited, what inclusion criteria (including what definition of schizophrenia) and exclusion criteria were used. It is also not clear how dosages of the antipsychotics were determined within the ranges defined for each drug in the study; it would make a difference whether pts were at the top end which, for many of those drugs is arguably an excessive and poorly tolerated dose. Random assignment of medications to subjects will lead to higher discontinuation rates because of intolerance than careful match between patient and medication.

It is not clear what the balance was in the study of discontinuation because of ineffectiveness as opposed to discontinuation becuase of intolerability. My first take on the fact that patients continued with olanzapine, aripiprazole and perphenazine longer than they did with quetiapine and risperidone relates to the fact that risperidone is more poorly tolerated at therapeutic doses and quetiapine is, simply, a less effective medication at controlling schizophrenic symptoms. Let us drill down further into this concept of “ineffectiveness.” This can mean one of several things because there are several different symptom domains in schizophrenia. Different theoreticians and researchers parse them differently, but concepts of the disease include some or all of the following realms — ‘positive’ symptoms, cognitive symptoms, ‘negative’ or ‘deficit’ symptoms, associated depression and other mood symptoms, and aggression/hostility. Only some of these symptom realms are considered to be responsive to antipsychotics. If medication fails to control the torture of active psychotic symptoms, patients will not remain engaged with treaters, will not organize their behavior and follow through with plans, etc. But most pts with this disease, even with effective medication control of florid psychotic symptoms, do not necessarily develop much insight — acceptance of their illness and need for treatment — or improvement in the cognitive domain. Associated depression may not respond to antipsychotics although we are beginning to think that it may be a core domain of the suffering in the disease, in contrast to the older outmoded notion thatt there are thought disorders and mood disorders and never the twain shall meet. So discontinuation of an antipsychotic may not have related to the drugs sucking as much as the illness sucking.

What treatment context and psychosocial supports were used during the lengthy trial? Follow me here — if the study design includes drug discontinuation (for how long — a missed dose? a day? a week?) as a data endpoint, the findings are not surprising at all. In realworld biopsychosocial treatment of patients with schizophrenia, there are lapses, fits and starts in treatment continuity almost as a matter of course. But in realworld treatment, they are not endpoints. Supportive interventions often result in the restoration of interrupted treatment, or seamless change to a different medication if the prior one was ineffective, without the pt spiralling down into a fullblown decompensation requiring psychiatric hospitalization.

I firmly believe that the newer, so-called atypical antipsychotic medications are a treatment advance over the older first-generation antipsychotics (Thorazine and Haldol and their derivatives). They are far more tolerable, but I do not in the least believe the contention that they cause less side effects. Rather, they cause different ones. Unless a patient experiences morbid weight gain, the side effects of the newer agents, in contrast to the older ones, are not irreversibly damaging or disfiguring. And the newer drugs may have more effects in the mood and cognitive spheres, and even that of impoverishment and ‘negative’ symptoms, than the older agents. But they are not curative. Schizophrenia is such a devastating illness that, if someone is normalized with treatment, it is likely they did not have schizophrenia. Yes, it sucks. But medication treatment does not deserve to be slandered by an out-of-context interpretation of a non-naturalistic study with little bearing on how we treat individuals with the illness in the real world, in a multidisciplinary model with psychosocial support.