Daily Archives: 2 Dec 05
The Zabul triangle
Fugitive Minds
American Traitor
Hunter on Daily Kos sets us straight on Ann Coulter. As Ed Fitzgerald, who pointed me to this post, observes, everyone should take any opportunity to ream Coulter out in public.
An abject coward, that endorses violence by others. A voice straining to resurrect McCarthy, he of the politically motivated faux hunt for witches and demons, the closest thing this country has to a He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named outside of the Harry Potter universe. A face twisted into unimaginable hate, with talk of the traitorousness of her perceived enemies, all of them better Americans than she can even momentarily pretend to be.
That such transparent propaganda, wrapped with such venom for her fellow Americans, could exist is hardly surprising. But those that publish her words should be branded with them. Those that give her a voice should be remembered for what they are, as surely as she herself.”
Kids Gone Wild?
…In 2002, only 9 percent of adults were able to say that the children they saw in public were ‘respectful toward adults,’ according to surveys done then by Public Agenda, a nonpartisan and nonprofit public opinion research group. In 2004, more than one in three teachers told Public Agenda pollsters they had seriously considered leaving their profession or knew a colleague who had left because of ‘intolerable’ student behavior.” (New York Times )
Viral cure could ‘immunise’ the internet
The March of the Extremists:
For the Love of Narnia
It’s a strategy that appears to be working, at least so far. While Newsweek, which was given an exclusive look at the rough cut of the movie, says that Lion is ‘only as Christian as you want it to be,’ Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, describes it as a ‘tool that many may find effective in communicating the message of Jesus to those who may not respond to other presentations.'” (The Chronicle of Higher Education)
Documents Reveal More About Court Pick’s Views
As the New York Times commented, this should be the nail in the coffin about Alito’s position on Roe v. Wade:
Having failed with the strategy of advancing candidates whose historic views are opaque or obscure, it seems to me the dysadministration’s counterattack on this would have to be the counterintuitive insistence that his views more than 20 years ago are not indicative of his current views. Oh, yes, and the simpleminded “no litmus test” mantra.