Surfing the Consensual Reality Wave

Web 2.0 Validator: “The score for http://gelwan.com/followme.html was 12 out of 20:

* Is in public beta? Yes!
* Uses python? Yes!
* Is Shadows-aware ? No
* Uses the prefix “meta” or “micro”? Yes!
* Mentions startup ? Yes!
* Refers to mash-ups ? No
* Appears to be web 3.0 ? Yes!
* Has favicon ? Yes!
* Uses Cascading Style Sheets? Yes!
* Uses Google Maps API? No
* Appears to use AJAX ? No
* Refers to VCs ? No
* Refers to Flickr ? Yes!
* Mentions Nitro ? Yes!
* Mentions Cool Words ? No
* Uses microformats ? No
* Refers to web2.0validator ? Yes!
* Mentions RDF and the Semantic Web? Yes!
* Validates as XHTML 1.1 ? No
* Mentions 30 Second Rule and Web 2.0 ? Yes!”

The 12:20 score is abit recursive, however, since just by virtue of posting this item I meet some of the “…mentions…” criteria. Originally, I was 5:18.

Here is Wikipedia’s piece on Web 2.0:

“The term “Web 2.0” refers to development of the World Wide Web, including its architecture and its applications.

As used by its proponents, the phrase currently refers to one or more of the below :

* a transition of websites from isolated information silos to sources of content and functionality, thus becoming a computing platform serving web applications to end users
* a social phenomenon referring to an approach to creating and distributing Web content itself, characterised by open communication, decentralization of authority, freedom to share and re-use, and “the market as a conversation”
* a more organized and categorized content, with a more developed deeplinking web architecture.
* a shift in economic value of the web, potentially equalling that of the dot com boom of the late 1990s

However, a consensus upon its exact meaning has not yet been reached. Skeptics argue that the term is essentially meaningless, or that it means whatever its proponents decide that they want it to mean in order to convince the media and investors that they are creating something fundamentally new, rather than continuing to develop and use well-established technologies.

Many recently developed concepts and technologies are seen as contributing to Web 2.0, including weblogs, wikis, podcasts, rss feeds and other forms of many to many publishing; social software, web APIs, web standards, online web services, AJAX, and others.

The concept is different from Web 1.0, as it is a move away from websites, email, using search engines and surfing from one website to the next. Others are more skeptical that such basic concepts can be superceded in any real way by those listed above.”

Schwarzenegger Mulls Clemency for Williams

“The governor said he would meet Dec. 8 in a private hearing with Williams’ lawyers, Los Angeles County prosecutors and others involved.

Williams, 51, faces a lethal injection on Dec. 13 for the 1979 slayings of a Whittier convenience store clerk and three people at a Pico Rivera motel. He has maintained his innocence and has asked the California Supreme Court to reopen his case, alleging shoddy forensics wrongly connected him to three of the murders. The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on the petition.

Two other clemency petitions have come before Schwarzenegger. Neither was granted.” (Yahoo! News)

More Good Reasons to be Polite and Civil

Man Cuts in Line, Is Wrestled to Ground: “Security guards wrestled a man to the ground in a Wal-Mart after he cut in line to get laptop computers that were on sale Friday, a television station reported.

The man started arguing with people inside the store, WFTV-TV in Orlando reported. He then started fighting with the guards, the station reported…” (Yahoo! News)

And: a fantastic opportunity to nail just the people who deserve to pay. (Freakonomics)

Also: 

Lynne Truss has another gripe with you: “She turned a book on her peeves with grammar into an unlikely bestseller. Now she’s unhappy with manners.” (New York Times Magazine)

And:  one amusing suggestion for incivility (Life’s Little Annoyances)

"I Wish Bush Would Be (Coherent, Eschewed) For Once During A Speech"…

“The school superintendent whose district includes Mount Anthony Union High School has labeled ‘inappropriate’ and ‘irresponsible’ an English teacher’s use of liberal statements in a vocabulary quiz.

‘I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes,’ said one question on a quiz written by English and social studies teacher Bret Chenkin.” (HuffPo via Friends of Elvis)