When Suffering Becomes an Abstraction:
Jeff Gates, at Life Outtacontext, meditates on the faith-based moral instigations that flow from Joe Klein’s troubling observation that
George W. Bush lives at the intersection of faith and
inexperience. This is not a reassuring address, especially
in a time of trouble.
To paraphrase the sense Gates makes of Klein, Bush is a concrete thinker whose faith, perhaps truly humble when faced with suffering and distress firsthand, becomes messianic and dogmatic “when suffering becomes an abstraction a budget item or deposing a despot Bush loses his sensitivity.” With such rigidity, Bush has no uncertainty about his assumed righteousness and is unswayed by dissent.
For reasons that don’t seem necessary, however, to the flow of his essay, Gates chooses to lump Andrew Sullivan in with Bush’s genre of moral certainty. Sullivan, though yes equally morally blind, seems not really to be of a piece with Dubya. I’m reminded of what I wrote below, on a seemingly different topic that there are multiple species of self-deception, some more insidious, and some more conscious, than others. Since his emergence as the Republican candidate, I have felt that Bush’s intellectual limitations the same ones Gates broods over in this essay make him a puppet of handlers who are more adept, more manipulative, and have a variety of other agendas. It has always seemed laughable that pundits discuss the messages in Bush’s speeches as if they were his own ideas rather than those of a committee of speechwriters vetted by the likes of Karl Rove and Dick Cheney. Similarly, all the motives ascribed to the administration for the war
- that it is for moral rectitude,
- for self-defense,
- to punish and chasten terrorists,
- to vanquish the infidels,
- to strike a blow against the Axis,
- for the greater glory of God,
- for American hegemony,
- to solve the Middle East problem,
- to end dependence on foreign oil,
- to line the pockets of the administration’s ruling class cronies,
- to prevent US humiliation,
- to liberate an oppressed people,
- to end history,
- as a proving ground for bigger and better things to come,
- to win reelection
- for Daddy; or to prove that you’re as good or better than him,
- because you can
are operative… somewhere inside the Beltway among those impelling us toward Baghdad. One aspect, Jeff, of the cognitively rigid Bush’s blinding by his certainties may be that all these motives run rampant with no policy helmsman arbitrating and cohering them. That may be why this war, and the world of hurt into which it will plunge us, the rest of the world, and our children, is inexorable.