A thoughtful debate between Sam Harris and Bruce Schneier. In the end, Schneier succinctly summarizes what is wrong with racial profiling:
“There are other security concerns when you look at the geopolitical
context, though. Profiling Muslims fosters an “us vs. them” thinking
that simply isn’t accurate when talking about terrorism. I have always
thought that the “war on terror” metaphor was actively harmful to
security because it raised the terrorists to the level of equal
combatant. In a war, there are sides, and there is winning. I much
prefer the crime metaphor. There are no opposing sides in crime; there
are the few criminals and the rest of us. There criminals don’t “win.”
Maybe they get away with it for a while, but eventually they’re caught.
“Us vs. them” thinking has two basic costs. One, it establishes that
worldview in the minds of “us”: the non-profiled. We saw this after
9/11, in the assaults and discriminations against innocent Americans who
happened to be Muslim. And two, it establishes the same worldview in
the minds of “them”: Muslims. This increases anti-American sentiment
among Muslims. This reduces our security, less because it creates
terrorists—although I’m sure it is one of the things that pushes a
marginal terrorist over the line—and more that a higher anti-American
sentiment in the Muslim community is a more fertile ground for terrorist
groups to recruit and operate. Making sure the vast majority of
Muslims who are not terrorists are part of the “us” fighting terror,
just as the vast majority of honest citizens work together in fighting
crime, is a security benefit.
Like many of the other things we’ve discussed here, we can debate how
big the costs and benefits I just described are, or we can simplify our
system and stop worrying about it.
One final cost. Security isn’t the only thing we’re trying to optimize;
there are other values at stake here. There’s a reason profiling is
often against the law, and that’s because it is contrary to our
country’s values. Sometimes we might have to set aside those values,
but not for this.”


