“The use of Tasers has become increasingly controversial over the last year, following high-profile cases such as the Tasering of a 10-year-old girl who had refused to take a shower and video of a 72-year-old great-grandmother who was Tasered following a driving offense. Now a federal appeals court in San Francisco has set down new rules for when police officers are allowed to use Tasers. In particular, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Tasers can’t be used simply to force a non-violent person to bend to an officer’s will. The court’s reason was that Taser’s X26 stun gun inflicts more pain than other “non-lethal” options….”It sounds like this court is attempting to raise the bar for non-lethal use of force,” retired Los Angeles Police Department Captain Greg Meyer told the Los Angeles Times. The ruling specifies that the Taser X26 and similar devices should only be used where there is “strong government interest [that] compels the employment of such force.” This rules out any situation in which there are alternative means of dealing with the situation. Some may see the new ruling as a great step forward for human rights. But there are reasons to be a little more cautious.
A recent study in the American Journal of Public Health looked at 24,000 cases in which police officers had used force, including Tasers, pepper spray, batons and manual methods. After controlling for factors such as the amount of resistance shown by the suspect, the study found that Taser use reduced the overall risk of injury by 65 percent. In other words, restricting Taser use could triple the number of injuries caused in this sort of incident.
It would be naïve to assume that there will not be any market response to the ruling. We have recently seen a rash of new devices aimed at police forces, including assorted laser dazzlers and pepper ball guns as Taser alternatives. There are also portable pain beams in prospect, both microwave and infrared laser varieties, not to mention various acoustic blasters. The ruling is likely to lead to more experimentation, both technical and in the courts, to find out just what the acceptable level of pain and suffering is and how it can best be delivered.” (Wired)
I often wonder just what those that complain about the police duing wrong were if placed in the position of protecting those that are being threated others would do. Always the first call when all else fails is to the police if your house were being robbed, you were being attacked, you were the object of someone who was not of good mind, your child was raped, you are driving down the freeway and were shot at, in many citys there is someong murdered every day, there is a drug dealer on your block, yes it goes on and on lets give our protectors the tools they need to do there job they need your help. OK today you may not have these problems or many others have you ever wondered why? the next time you see a policemen know they to have a family a life that is very demanding and makes it possible for you and your family sleep safely in there beds at night. Know that they are not perfect like you and I make mistakes taking care of us it is important we support them. There lives are on the line every time they go to work, you expect them to take care of you help to take care of them.
LikeLike
Yes, but when a file clerk makes a mistake, it is very rare that it results in someone’s death, as it so frequently does when a cop makes a mistake. They should be held to a higher standard and should always use the minimum possible force in any situation.
LikeLike