the first editorial position it has taken on a presidential race in its 80-year history. This is a wide-ranging and breathtaking indictment of the Bush record and a sober appraisal of the hopes invested in Kerry.
“But the challenger has more to offer than the fact that he is not George W. Bush. In every crucial area of concern to Americans (the economy, health care, the environment, Social Security, the judiciary, national security, foreign policy, the war in Iraq, the fight against terrorism), Kerry offers a clear, corrective alternative to Bush’s curious blend of smugness, radicalism, and demagoguery. Pollsters like to ask voters which candidate they’d most like to have a beer with, and on that metric Bush always wins. We prefer to ask which candidate is better suited to the governance of our nation.”
Any thinking person who reads this could only vote one way. A pity many aren’t, and won’t.
