Whether the declared
war against terror will amount to a new cold war I’m not sure. The war
against Communism had a definable end, where ending terrorism is a
goal without a goal line. And I wonder if we have the patience for
another 40-year war. … There is, of course, no Soviet Union of terrorism, but … there are striking parallels.
…If we are serious about this, it is one of those conflicts that can realign the
world. Like the cold war, this one, while it lasts, will assert a gravitational
pull on everything. It will determine who our friends are, revise our
priorities and test the elasticity of our ideals. It will influence which
departments are suddenly overenrolled in our colleges and who the bad
guys are in our movies. It is siphoning our charity from a hundred
important but suddenly less topical causes, and turning grade- school fire
drills into the modern equivalent of my childhood duck- and-cover
exercises. It will provide — already is providing — a new, opportunistic
national-interest spin for lobbyists peddling everything from corporate tax
cuts to medical research to farm subsidies. It may, belatedly, reshape our
lumbering military and our neglected intelligence services. In the cold war,
we trained soldiers to fight on great battlefields and spies to pass for
diplomats. Now, if we’re smart, we’ll be buying agility and shrewdness
and daring. We’ll be featuring Islamic Americans in our Army enlistment
ads and maybe recruiting some of those bright Saudi college kids from
the prolific bin Laden family. New York Times commentary
