I’ll take Manhattan. British writer Anthony Holden writes of the vibrancy of the New York literary scene that has him moving there to escape London’s stodginess.
It’s not just that Britain, viewed from a real
democracy, more than ever exudes its
lethal combination of self-satisfaction and
backward thinking: still dithering
xenophobically about Europe (for me, its
only hope of any future as even a
wannabe world power); keeping 92
hereditary peers, for pity’s sake, not to
mention that pantomime horse of a
monarchy; blowing a billion pounds’ worth
of schools and hospitals on that hollow,
doomed, vainglorious Dome; grumbling
nationalistically about immigrants when
they are the pulsating lifeblood of my
adopted homeland, its raison d’ tre . No,
for me, it’s also that the intellectual,
cultural and literary life of the Eastern
seaboard is (like the language) more alive,
more alert, much feistier than the primping
and preening of London’s cosy circle of
back-patting glitterati. Viewed from here
after a month back in Britain, the old
country seems more than ever like some
overgrown, nose-in-air, single-sex Pall
Mall club, whose pettifogging rules it is so
rejuvenating to escape. The Observer
This article ends with small blurbs on prominent “Brits who love the US” and “Yanks who love the UK.” Salman Rushdie has thumbed his nose at London’s narrowness in favor of the Manhattan high life as well, prompting a firestorm of British literary umbrage for his apparent lack of gratitude for the support and shelter he received in the face of the Islamic fatwa against him.
Several months ago, I blinked to an article about American artists visiting London bemoaning the stultification of the U. S. arts scene in comparison to the liveliness they found in London. Go figure.
